Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Lennon 2008<br />
Methods Design: pilot randomised study of cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong> versus usual care - after usual<br />
care. Sample size calculation reported<br />
Randomisation: stratified randomisation (by age and sex) into 4 blocks of 6 using a sequence<br />
generator by an independent party<br />
Allocation concealment: opaque envelopes<br />
Blinding: single-blinded. Unclear who was blinded.<br />
Intention-to-treat: no but only 1 participant dropped out in the control group<br />
Measurements: end of intervention (10 weeks)<br />
Withdrawals: 1 participant (refusal) in the control group<br />
Participants Randomised: total 48 participants. Participants were recruited from the Stroke Rehabilitation<br />
Database (Dublin). Volunteers contacted the research team <strong>for</strong> initial screening<br />
Intervention: 24 participants, 14 males (58%) and 10 females (42%); mean age 59.0 years<br />
(SD 10.3); mean number of weeks from <strong>stroke</strong> 237.3 (SD 110.7)<br />
Control: 24 participants; 14 males (58%) and 10 females (42%); mean age 60.5 years (SD<br />
10.0), mean number of weeks from <strong>stroke</strong> 245.3 (SD 169.8)<br />
Inclusion criteria: > 1 year post ischaemic <strong>stroke</strong> and over 18 years of age; participants were<br />
recruited irrespective of their ability to ambulate independently<br />
Exclusion criteria: O2 dependence, angina, unstable cardiac conditions, uncontrolled diabetes<br />
mellitus, major medical conditions, claudication, cognitive impairment or beta<br />
blocker medication<br />
Interventions Intervention: the Cardiac Rehabilitation Programme consisted of cycle ergometry <strong>training</strong><br />
using either the upper or lower limbs. Exercise load was set at 50% to 60% of the participants’<br />
maximal heart rate. Resistance and speed were adjusted daily to ensure progression.<br />
Frequency: participants trained twice weekly <strong>for</strong> 30 minutes each time, <strong>for</strong> 10 weeks. Measurements<br />
per<strong>for</strong>med at week 1 and re-assessment at week 10. All sessions were supervised<br />
by a physiotherapist<br />
Control: conventional physiotherapy and occupational therapy; no therapy contained an<br />
aerobic exercise component; measurements at week 1 and re-assessment at week 10. No<br />
further details provided<br />
Setting: outpatient rehabilitation<br />
Outcomes Included outcomes: VO2; BMI; maximum cycle workload; resting systolic blood pressure;<br />
resting diastolic blood pressure; total cholesterol; FAI; HADS<br />
Other outcomes: resting heart rate; cardiac risk score; rate of perceived exertion<br />
Notes The trial authors maintained that their pilot study was too small <strong>for</strong> detecting functional<br />
benefits (a minimum of 120 participants in each group would have been required to show<br />
expected change in all primary outcomes) ; possible Hawthorn effect due to the fact that<br />
the control group did not receive the comparable non-exercise related attention to the<br />
intervention group<br />
Risk of bias<br />
Bias Authors’ judgement Support <strong>for</strong> judgement<br />
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Opaque envelopes (sealed?)<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
56