06.01.2013 Views

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 3. Outline of the studies which focused on mixed <strong>training</strong> interventions (Continued)<br />

Duncan<br />

2003<br />

James<br />

2002<br />

Circuit<br />

<strong>training</strong><br />

Circuit<br />

<strong>training</strong><br />

Yang 2006 Functionalstepping<br />

and<br />

chair rising<br />

Mead<br />

2007<br />

Circuit includingwalking,stepping,<br />

cycle<br />

ergometry;<br />

resistance<br />

<strong>training</strong><br />

body mass,<br />

weights<br />

and elastic<br />

After Lower<br />

body<br />

tion maximum,<br />

3 x<br />

10 repetitions<br />

(strength<br />

component)<br />

Yes 50% to<br />

60% heart<br />

rate reserve<br />

90 to 120 3 4 Cardio: yes<br />

Strength:<br />

unclear<br />

After Both Yes Unknown 90 3 12 to 14<br />

(total of 36<br />

sessions)<br />

After Lower<br />

body<br />

After Both Yes Rating<br />

of perceivedexertion:<br />

13<br />

to 16<br />

Yes Unknown 30 3 4 No<br />

40 to 75 3 12 to 14<br />

(total of 36<br />

sessions)<br />

Cardio: no<br />

Strength:<br />

yes<br />

Unknown<br />

Table 4. Pooled walking data <strong>for</strong> cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong>, resistance <strong>training</strong>, and mixed <strong>training</strong> at the end of the <strong>training</strong><br />

period and at follow-up<br />

End of intervention End of follow-up<br />

Intervention Walking outcome<br />

Cardiorespiratory<br />

<strong>training</strong><br />

Maximal gait<br />

speed<br />

Preferred gait<br />

speed<br />

Trials<br />

(number of<br />

participants)<br />

MD<br />

(95% CI)<br />

7 (365) 8.66 m/min<br />

(2.98, 14.34)<br />

4 (221) 4.68 m/min<br />

(1.40, 7.96)<br />

Significance<br />

level<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

Trials<br />

(number of<br />

participants)<br />

MD<br />

(95% CI)<br />

P = 0.003 3 (186) 8.21 m/min<br />

(3.38, 13.05)<br />

P = 0.005 - - -<br />

Significance<br />

level<br />

P = 0.0009<br />

229

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!