06.01.2013 Views

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Ouellette 2004 (Continued)<br />

using pneumatic resistance, and unilateral ankle; dorsiflexion; plantarflexion, both using<br />

weights; progression achieved via weekly assessment of 1-RM; warm up <strong>for</strong> each exercise<br />

was 4 repetitions of 25% 1-RM<br />

Control: non-exercise: bilateral range of motion and upper body flexibility exercises 3 days/<br />

week <strong>for</strong> 12 weeks<br />

Setting: exercise laboratory<br />

Outcomes Included outcomes: muscle strength (bilateral lower limb extension <strong>for</strong>ce); muscle strength<br />

(unilateral knee extension, ankle dorsiflexion and ankle plantarflexion); gait endurance<br />

(6MWT), preferred speed (10 metres) and maximal speed (10 metres); chair rise time (5<br />

repetitions); stair climb time (10 steps); late life function and disability instrument scale;<br />

SF-36 physical function subscale<br />

Other outcomes: muscle power - bilateral lower limb extension and unilateral knee extension;<br />

geriatric depression scale (data not reported); sickness impact profile; Ewarts selfefficacy<br />

scale<br />

Notes Variance reported as standard error and converted to standard deviation<br />

Risk of bias<br />

Bias Authors’ judgement Support <strong>for</strong> judgement<br />

Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported<br />

Pohl 2002<br />

Methods Design: randomised trial of cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong> plus % usual care versus usual care<br />

- during usual care<br />

Randomisation mechanism: unknown; method: equal block based on gait speed<br />

Allocation concealment: unknown<br />

Blinding: investigator; efficacy unknown<br />

Intention-to-treat: no<br />

Measurements: end of intervention (4 weeks)<br />

Withdrawals: none<br />

Participants Randomised: 60 participants. 20 participants were randomised to the speed-dependent<br />

treadmill <strong>training</strong> group (STT); 20 participants to the limited progressive treadmill <strong>training</strong><br />

group (LTT) and 20 participants to a conventional gait <strong>training</strong> group (CGT).<br />

Intervention: STT group = 20 participants; 14 males, 6 females; age 57.1 years (SD 13.9);<br />

16.8 (20.5) weeks post-<strong>stroke</strong>. LTT group = 20 participants; 16 males, 4 females; age 58.2<br />

years (SD 10.5); 16.2 (16.4) weeks post-<strong>stroke</strong>.<br />

Control: 20 participants; 13 males, 7 females; age 61.6 years (SD 10.6); 16.10 (SD 18.5)<br />

weeks post-<strong>stroke</strong><br />

Inclusion criteria: left or right hemiparesis <strong>for</strong> > 4 weeks; impaired gait; no or slight abnormal<br />

muscle tone (Ashworth Score 0 and 1); walk without assistance (FAC = 3); 10-metre walk<br />

time > 5 seconds and < 60 seconds; class B exercise risk (ACSM 1998); absence of known<br />

heart disease; no evidence of heart failure, ischaemia or angina at rest or exercise; appropriate<br />

rise in systolic blood pressure and absence of ventricular tachycardia during exercise<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

61

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!