Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

More documents

Recommendations

Info

$Propofol versus thiopental sodium for the treatment of refractory ...$

of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD004366.pub4] Meek 2003 Meek C, Pollock A, Potter J, Langhorne P. A systematic review of exercise trials post stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003;17(1):6–13. Michael 2007 Michael K, Macko RF. Ambulatory activity intensity profiles, fitness, and fatigue in chronic stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2007;14(2):5–12. Morris 2004 Morris SL, Dodd KJ, Morris ME. Outcomes of progressive resistance strength training following stroke: a systematic review. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004;18(1):27–39. Moseley 2005 Moseley AM, Stark A, Cameron ID, Pollock A. Treadmill training and body weight support for walking after stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 2. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002840.pub2] Nelson 2007 Nelson ME, Rejeski WJ, Blair SN, Duncan PW, Judge JO, King AC, et al.Physical activity and public health in older adults: recommendation from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 2007;39: 1435–45. O’Donovan 2010 O’Donovan G, Blazevich AJ, Boreham C, Cooper AR, Crank H, Ekelund U, et al.The ABC of physical activity for health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. Journal of Sports Sciences 2010;28(6):573–91. Pang 2006a Pang MYC, Eng JJ, Dawson AS, Gylfadóttir S. The use of aerobic exercise training in improving aerobic capacity in individuals with stroke: a meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation 2006;20(2):97–111. Patterson 2007 Patterson SL, Forrester LW, Rodgers MM, Ryan AS, Ivey FM, Sorkin JD, et al.Determinants of walking function after stroke: differences by deficit severity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007;88(1):115–9. Patterson 2009 Patterson S, Ross-Edwards B. Long-term stroke survivors’ needs and perceptions of an exercise maintenance model of care. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 2009; Vol. 16, issue 12:659–69. Puthoff 2007 Puthoff ML, Nielsen DH. Relationships among impairments in lower-extremity strength and power, functional limitations, and disability in older adults. Physical Therapy 2007;87(10):1334–47. Ramas 2007 Ramas J, Courbon A, Roche F, Bethoux F, Calmels P. Effect of training programs and exercise in adult stroke patients: Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. literature review. Annales de Readaptation et de Medecine Physique 2007;50(6):438–44. Rantanen 2001 Rantanen T, Guralnik JM, Ferrucci L, Penninx BWJH, Leveille S, Sipila S, et al.Coimpairments as predictors of severe walking disability in older women. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 2001;49(1):21–7. RevMan 2011 The Nordic Cochrane Centre. The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). 5.1. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre. The Cochrane Collaboration, 20011. Saunders 2004 Saunders DH, Greig CA, Young A, Mead GE. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35:2235. Saunders 2008 Saunders DH, Greig CA, Young A, Mead GE. Association of activity limitations and lower-limb explosive extensor power in ambulatory people with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2008;89(4):677–83. Shaw 2006 Shaw KA, Gennat HC, O’Rourke P, Del Mar C. Exercise for overweight or obesity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD003817.pub3] Shephard 2009 Shephard RJ. Maximal oxygen intake and independence in old age. British Journal of Sports Medicine 2009;43(5): 342–6. Thomas 2006 Thomas DE, Elliott EJ, Naughton GA. Exercise for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD002968.pub2] Urton 2007 Urton ML, Kohia M, Davis J, Neill MR. Systematic literature review of treatment interventions for upper extremity hemiparesis following stroke. Occupational Therapy International 2007;14(1):11–27. USDHHS 2008 US Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report. Atlanta: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008. Van de Port 2007 Van de Port IGL, Wood-Dauphinee SPP, Lindeman EP, Kwakkel GP. Effects of exercise training programs on walking competency after stroke: a systematic review. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2007;86(11):935–51. Van der Lee 2001 Van der Lee JH, Snels IA, Beckerman H, Lankhorst GJ, Wagenaar RC, Bouter LM. Exercise therapy for arm function in stroke patients: a systematic review of 37
andomized controlled trials. Clinical Rehabilitation 2001; 15(1):20–31. Van Peppen 2004 Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, Hendriks HJ, Van der Wees PJ, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what’s the evidence?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004;18(8):833–62. Wade 1992 Wade DT. Measurement in Neurological Rehabilitation. Oxford University Press, 1992. Wagenaar 1991 Wagenaar RC, Meijer OG. Effects of stroke rehabilitation (1). A critical review of the literature. Journal of Rehabilitation Sciences 1991;4(3):61–73. Wendel-Vos 2004 Wendel-Vos GCW, Schuit AJ, Feskens EJM, Boshuizen HC, Verschuren WMM, Saris WHM, et al.Physical activity and stroke. A meta-analysis of observational data. International Journal of Epidemiology 2004;33(4):787–98. WHO 2001 International Classification of Functional Disability and Handicap. World Health Organization (WHO). Fifty- Fourth World Health Assembly WHA54.21 2001, issue http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/ – accessed Nov 2010. Young 2001 Young A. For a healthier old age. In: Young A, Harries M editor(s). Physical Activity for Patients: An Exercise Prescription. London: Royal College of Physicians, 2001. Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Zigmond 1983 Zigmond AS, Snaith PR. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 1983;67: 361–70. References to other published versions of this review Saunders 2002 Saunders DH, Greig CA, Young A, Mead GE. Physical fitness training for acute stroke patients - a systematic review. Cerebrovascular Diseases 2002;13 Suppl 3:63. Saunders 2004a Saunders DH, Greig C, Young A, Mead G. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD003316.pub2] Saunders 2004b Saunders DH, Greig C, Young A, Mead G. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Stroke 2004;35:2235. Saunders 2009 Saunders DH, Greig CA, Mead GE, Young A. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/ 14651858.CD003316.pub3] ∗ Indicates the major publication for the study 38
Page 1 and 2: Physical fitness training for strok
Page 3 and 4: Analysis 1.19. Comparison 1 Cardior
Page 5 and 6: Analysis 5.10. Comparison 5 Mixed t
Page 7 and 8: Analysis 7.2. Comparison 7 Cardiore
Page 9 and 10: walking speed (mean difference (MD)
Page 11 and 12: Post-stroke physical activity and f
Page 13 and 14: Search methods for identification o
Page 15 and 16: • type of training (cardiorespira
Page 17 and 18: Compliance with the scheduled exerc
Page 19 and 20: Case fatality Number of deaths was
Page 21 and 22: we did not include these data in th
Page 23 and 24: (Flansbjer 2008; Kim 2001; Ouellett
Page 25 and 26: data were, however, confounded by a
Page 27 and 28: Vascular risk factors A few trials
Page 29 and 30: ical function outcomes did not impr
Page 31 and 32: We thank the Cochrane Stroke Group
Page 33 and 34: or relaxation. Proceedings of the U
Page 35 and 36: Dean 1997 {published data only} Dea
Page 37 and 38: (LEAPS): a randomized controlled tr
Page 39 and 40: with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilit
Page 41 and 42: Askim {published data only} Askim T
Page 43: Hobart 2002 Hobart JC, Williams LS,
Page 47 and 48: Bale 2008 Methods Design: randomise
Page 49 and 50: Cooke 2010 Methods Design: phase I
Page 51 and 52: da Cunha 2002 Methods Design: rando
Page 53 and 54: Duncan 1998 Methods Design: randomi
Page 55 and 56: Eich 2004 Methods Design: randomise
Page 57 and 58: Flansbjer 2008 (Continued) Allocati
Page 59 and 60: James 2002 Methods Design: randomis
Page 61 and 62: Kim 2001 Methods Design: randomised
Page 63 and 64: Lennon 2008 Methods Design: pilot r
Page 65 and 66: Moore 2010 Methods Design: randomis
Page 67 and 68: Mudge 2009 (Continued) sessions (e.
Page 69 and 70: Pohl 2002 (Continued) Exclusion cri
Page 71 and 72: Richards 1993 (Continued) Intervent
Page 73 and 74: Salbach 2004 (Continued) Interventi
Page 75 and 76: Smith 2008 (Continued) Inclusion cr
Page 77 and 78: Winstein 2004 (Continued) sive hydr
Page 79 and 80: mAS: modified Ashworth Scale MAS: M
Page 81 and 82: (Continued) Franceschini 2009 Not v
Page 83 and 84: (Continued) Maeshima 2003 Not a rel
Page 85 and 86: (Continued) Thielman 2005 Not a rel
Page 87 and 88: Eng Trial name or title The effect
Page 89 and 90: Ivey (B) Trial name or title Streng
Page 91 and 92: Protas (Continued) Participants 48
Page 93 and 94: Suskin 2007 (Continued) Time frame:
Page 95 and 96:
Wolff Trial name or title Effects o
Page 97 and 98:
11.2 After usual care 3 169 Mean Di
Page 99 and 100:
7 Physical fitness - maximum cyclin
Page 101 and 102:
10.2 After usual care 1 20 Mean Dif
Page 103 and 104:
13 Physical fitness - muscle streng
Page 105 and 106:
36 Mood - Hospital Anxiety and Depr
Page 107 and 108:
21.2 After usual care 1 80 Mean Dif
Page 109 and 110:
Analysis 1.2. Comparison 1 Cardiore
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Analysis 1.10. Comparison 1 Cardior
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Analysis 3.1. Comparison 3 Resisten
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Analysis 3.11. Comparison 3 Resiste
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Analysis 5.1. Comparison 5 Mixed tr
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Analysis 5.11. Comparison 5 Mixed t
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Table 1. Outline of the studies whi
Page 235 and 236:
Table 3. Outline of the studies whi
Page 237 and 238:
Table 4. Pooled walking data for ca
Page 239 and 240:
#42.(physical in Abstract and (exer
Page 241 and 242:
71 8 and 36 and 70 72 limit 71 to h
Page 243 and 244:
S58. (MH “Random Assignment”) o
Page 245 and 246:
W H A T ’ S N E W Last assessed a
Page 247:
MeSH check words Humans Physical fi
show all

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?