Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
mAS: modified Ashworth Scale<br />
MAS: Motor Assessment Scale<br />
MI: myocardial infarction<br />
MMSE: Mini Mental State Examination<br />
NEADL: Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living<br />
NHP: Nottingham Health Profile<br />
PADS: Peripheral Arterial Diseases Walking Impairment questionnaire<br />
RLOC: Recovery Locus of Control Scale<br />
RMA: Rivermead Motor Assessment<br />
RMI: Rivermead Mobility Index<br />
SD: standard deviation<br />
SF-12: Short Form-12 Health Survey Questionnaire<br />
SF-36: Short Form 36 Health Survey<br />
SIP: Stroke Impact Scale<br />
SIS: Stroke Impact Scale<br />
SSS: Scandinavian Stroke Scale<br />
SWLS: Satisfaction with Life sSale<br />
TUG: Timed Up and Go test<br />
Characteristics of excluded studies [ordered by study ID]<br />
Study Reason <strong>for</strong> exclusion<br />
Ada 2003 Control intervention was described as <strong>training</strong> and included prescribed walking which confounds this<br />
walking study<br />
Ada 2010 Not valid comparison (treadmill gait <strong>training</strong> with body weight support versus overground gait <strong>training</strong>)<br />
Akbari 2006 Not valid control group<br />
Au-Yeung 2009 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> (short-<strong>for</strong>m Tai Chi). Not valid control<br />
Barreca 2007 Not progressive physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong><br />
Baskett 1999 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>: it is described as exercise and activities but no evidence of<br />
progressive cardiorespiratory or strength elements, or both<br />
Batchelor 2009 Intervention not physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> (falls prevention programme)<br />
Blennerhassett 2004 Control group per<strong>for</strong>m upper limb <strong>training</strong> intervention - this could theoretically influence lower limb<br />
outcome measures<br />
Bourbonnais 2002 Comparison of upper and lower body exercise<br />
Brown 2002 Comparison of 2 exercise regimens<br />
Butefisch 1995 Non-random, alternate allocation on admission method<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
72