Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ical function outcomes did not improve after resistance <strong>training</strong><br />
interventions, probably because functionally relevant movements<br />
are difficult to incorporate into resistance <strong>training</strong> interventions.<br />
Timing of <strong>training</strong><br />
Due to limited data being available, we were unable to per<strong>for</strong>m<br />
subgroup analyses to compare interventions during usual care with<br />
interventions after usual care.<br />
Retention of benefits<br />
Functional advantages observed at the end of rehabilitation interventions<br />
are known to be transient, disappearing at a later stage<br />
(Kwakkel 1999; Kwakkel 2002). This is probably due to continued<br />
improvements in the control group rather than deterioration<br />
in function (Langhorne 2002). Fitness improvements observed at<br />
the end of <strong>training</strong> interventions are also known to deteriorate.<br />
Few trials included in this review assessed possible retention of<br />
benefits over time. Most of the functional improvements observed<br />
at the end of the <strong>training</strong> period were not sustained at later assessments.<br />
We found, however, that cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong> effects<br />
on measures of walking per<strong>for</strong>mance were retained at the end of<br />
the follow-up period. This retention effect could have arisen from<br />
an increase in habitual levels of physical activity (including walking)<br />
facilitated by participation in a <strong>training</strong> intervention. The<br />
extent to which short-term <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> influences longer-term<br />
habitual physical activity after <strong>stroke</strong> is still unknown. Currently,<br />
there are no data examining either long-term <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> interventions<br />
or interventions to facilitate continued exercise after the<br />
<strong>training</strong> intervention is completed. Long-term assessments should<br />
be incorporated into future trials of physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>.<br />
Effect of physical activity per<strong>for</strong>med by control groups<br />
Training effects arising from physical activity in the control group<br />
could partly explain the lack of effect observed in some of the<br />
included trials.<br />
Effect of trial quality<br />
There are insufficient data to reliably examine the effects of trial<br />
quality on estimates of effect. Overall, the methodological quality<br />
of most of the 32 included trials was modest. Only four trials<br />
enrolled more than 80 participants, and 12 trials had 20 or<br />
fewer participants. Only 16 trials employed adequate methods of<br />
sequence generation and 19 trials had blinded outcome assessors<br />
(but some degree of unmasking occurred in three of these trials).<br />
The rate of attendance could only be determined in half of the<br />
included trials.<br />
Summary of review findings<br />
• Most available data relate to ambulatory people in the<br />
chronic phase (more than one month) post-<strong>stroke</strong>.<br />
• It is feasible <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> survivors to participate in a variety of<br />
short-term <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> regimens presented in a range of<br />
settings, either during usual <strong>stroke</strong> care or after hospital<br />
discharge.<br />
• There are insufficient data to assess death and dependence<br />
outcomes reliably.<br />
• From the limited data reported in the included trials, there<br />
is an indication that participation in <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> programmes<br />
is safe and does not result in serious adverse events.<br />
• Global indices of disability are not consistently reported in<br />
trials of <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>. No conclusions can be drawn from the<br />
available data.<br />
• There is some evidence that cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong> may<br />
improve physical <strong>fitness</strong> outcomes.<br />
• There is clear evidence that cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong><br />
improves measures of walking per<strong>for</strong>mance (e.g. walking speed<br />
and walking capacity) and reduces dependence during usual care.<br />
These <strong>training</strong> effects are retained at follow-up.<br />
• There are insufficient data to assess reliably the effects of<br />
resistance <strong>training</strong>.<br />
• There is a suggestion that mixed <strong>training</strong> may improve<br />
measures of walking per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />
• There is an indication that the <strong>training</strong> effect may be<br />
greater when <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> is specific or ’task-related’.<br />
• There are few data relating to physical function, quality of<br />
life, and mood outcomes.<br />
• There are insufficient data to conduct meaningful subgroup<br />
analyses to explore the effects of the type, ’dose’, and timing of<br />
<strong>training</strong> on outcome measures.<br />
• Limited methodological quality of included trials and<br />
relatively small sample sizes hamper the generalizability of<br />
findings.<br />
Issues <strong>for</strong> research<br />
Control groups<br />
<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />
In terms of trial design, there should be a concerted ef<strong>for</strong>t to balance<br />
total contact time across all arms in order to avoid confounded<br />
results. Preferably, the control intervention should contain minimal<br />
or no physical activity since even per<strong>for</strong>ming activities of daily<br />
living may be sufficient to cause <strong>training</strong> effects in elderly people<br />
(Young 2001). One robust way of clarifying whether the content<br />
of the <strong>training</strong> itself is beneficial would be, <strong>for</strong> example, to compare<br />
and assess two doses of <strong>training</strong>.<br />
22