06.01.2013 Views

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ical function outcomes did not improve after resistance <strong>training</strong><br />

interventions, probably because functionally relevant movements<br />

are difficult to incorporate into resistance <strong>training</strong> interventions.<br />

Timing of <strong>training</strong><br />

Due to limited data being available, we were unable to per<strong>for</strong>m<br />

subgroup analyses to compare interventions during usual care with<br />

interventions after usual care.<br />

Retention of benefits<br />

Functional advantages observed at the end of rehabilitation interventions<br />

are known to be transient, disappearing at a later stage<br />

(Kwakkel 1999; Kwakkel 2002). This is probably due to continued<br />

improvements in the control group rather than deterioration<br />

in function (Langhorne 2002). Fitness improvements observed at<br />

the end of <strong>training</strong> interventions are also known to deteriorate.<br />

Few trials included in this review assessed possible retention of<br />

benefits over time. Most of the functional improvements observed<br />

at the end of the <strong>training</strong> period were not sustained at later assessments.<br />

We found, however, that cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong> effects<br />

on measures of walking per<strong>for</strong>mance were retained at the end of<br />

the follow-up period. This retention effect could have arisen from<br />

an increase in habitual levels of physical activity (including walking)<br />

facilitated by participation in a <strong>training</strong> intervention. The<br />

extent to which short-term <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> influences longer-term<br />

habitual physical activity after <strong>stroke</strong> is still unknown. Currently,<br />

there are no data examining either long-term <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> interventions<br />

or interventions to facilitate continued exercise after the<br />

<strong>training</strong> intervention is completed. Long-term assessments should<br />

be incorporated into future trials of physical <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>.<br />

Effect of physical activity per<strong>for</strong>med by control groups<br />

Training effects arising from physical activity in the control group<br />

could partly explain the lack of effect observed in some of the<br />

included trials.<br />

Effect of trial quality<br />

There are insufficient data to reliably examine the effects of trial<br />

quality on estimates of effect. Overall, the methodological quality<br />

of most of the 32 included trials was modest. Only four trials<br />

enrolled more than 80 participants, and 12 trials had 20 or<br />

fewer participants. Only 16 trials employed adequate methods of<br />

sequence generation and 19 trials had blinded outcome assessors<br />

(but some degree of unmasking occurred in three of these trials).<br />

The rate of attendance could only be determined in half of the<br />

included trials.<br />

Summary of review findings<br />

• Most available data relate to ambulatory people in the<br />

chronic phase (more than one month) post-<strong>stroke</strong>.<br />

• It is feasible <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> survivors to participate in a variety of<br />

short-term <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> regimens presented in a range of<br />

settings, either during usual <strong>stroke</strong> care or after hospital<br />

discharge.<br />

• There are insufficient data to assess death and dependence<br />

outcomes reliably.<br />

• From the limited data reported in the included trials, there<br />

is an indication that participation in <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> programmes<br />

is safe and does not result in serious adverse events.<br />

• Global indices of disability are not consistently reported in<br />

trials of <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong>. No conclusions can be drawn from the<br />

available data.<br />

• There is some evidence that cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong> may<br />

improve physical <strong>fitness</strong> outcomes.<br />

• There is clear evidence that cardiorespiratory <strong>training</strong><br />

improves measures of walking per<strong>for</strong>mance (e.g. walking speed<br />

and walking capacity) and reduces dependence during usual care.<br />

These <strong>training</strong> effects are retained at follow-up.<br />

• There are insufficient data to assess reliably the effects of<br />

resistance <strong>training</strong>.<br />

• There is a suggestion that mixed <strong>training</strong> may improve<br />

measures of walking per<strong>for</strong>mance.<br />

• There is an indication that the <strong>training</strong> effect may be<br />

greater when <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> is specific or ’task-related’.<br />

• There are few data relating to physical function, quality of<br />

life, and mood outcomes.<br />

• There are insufficient data to conduct meaningful subgroup<br />

analyses to explore the effects of the type, ’dose’, and timing of<br />

<strong>training</strong> on outcome measures.<br />

• Limited methodological quality of included trials and<br />

relatively small sample sizes hamper the generalizability of<br />

findings.<br />

Issues <strong>for</strong> research<br />

Control groups<br />

<strong>Physical</strong> <strong>fitness</strong> <strong>training</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>stroke</strong> <strong>patients</strong> (<strong>Review</strong>)<br />

Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.<br />

In terms of trial design, there should be a concerted ef<strong>for</strong>t to balance<br />

total contact time across all arms in order to avoid confounded<br />

results. Preferably, the control intervention should contain minimal<br />

or no physical activity since even per<strong>for</strong>ming activities of daily<br />

living may be sufficient to cause <strong>training</strong> effects in elderly people<br />

(Young 2001). One robust way of clarifying whether the content<br />

of the <strong>training</strong> itself is beneficial would be, <strong>for</strong> example, to compare<br />

and assess two doses of <strong>training</strong>.<br />

22

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!