Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review) - Update Software

Analysis 5.2. Comparison 5 Mixed training versus control - end of intervention, Outcome 2 Disability -
Lawton IADL.
Review: Physical fitness training for stroke patients
Comparison: 5 Mixed training versus control - end of intervention
Outcome: 2 Disability - Lawton IADL
Study or subgroup Training Control Mean Difference Weight Mean Difference
N Mean(SD) N Mean(SD) IV,Random,95% CI IV,Random,95% CI
1 During usual care
Subtotal (95% CI) 0 0 0.0 % 0.0 [ 0.0, 0.0 ]
Heterogeneity: not applicable
Test for overall effect: not applicable
2 After usual care
Duncan 1998 10 22 (4.24) 10 22.2 (3.82) 14.3 % -0.20 [ -3.74, 3.34 ]
Duncan 2003 44 22.8 (3.2) 49 21.8 (3.9) 85.7 % 1.00 [ -0.44, 2.44 ]
Subtotal (95% CI) 54 59 100.0 % 0.83 [ -0.51, 2.17 ]
Heterogeneity: Tau 2 = 0.0; Chi 2 = 0.38, df = 1 (P = 0.54); I 2 =0.0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.21 (P = 0.22)
Total (95% CI) 54 59 100.0 % 0.83 [ -0.51, 2.17 ]
Heterogeneity: Tau 2 = 0.0; Chi 2 = 0.38, df = 1 (P = 0.54); I 2 =0.0%
Test for overall effect: Z = 1.21 (P = 0.22)
Test for subgroup differences: Not applicable
Physical fitness training for stroke patients (Review)
Copyright © 2011 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
-10 -5 0 5 10
Favours control Favours training
163