A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

FIGURE 6.7 USE OF WEB MAPPING ................................................................................................. 168
FIGURE 6.8 MAKING SPATIAL DATA ACCESSIBLE FACILITATES BUSINESS ....................................... 169
FIGURE 6.9 MOST COMMON SPATIAL DATA SOURCED FROM STATE GOVERNMENT AGENCIES ......... 170
FIGURE 6.10 SOURCE OF PROPERTY DATA REQUESTS BY NUMBER OF LGAS.................................. 171
FIGURE 6.11 AVERAGE LEVEL OF COMPLETENESS OF SPATIAL DATA BY DATA THEME.................... 172
FIGURE 6.12 LEVEL OF INTEGRATION OF GIS WITH OTHER SYSTEMS IN LGAS ............................... 174
FIGURE 6.13 QUALIFICATION OF GIS STAFF IN LGAS.................................................................... 175
FIGURE 6.14 LEVEL OF COLLABORATION OF LGAS WITH OTHER ORGANISATIONS.......................... 176
FIGURE 6.15 RANKING OF BARRIERS FOR LGA PARTICIPATION IN DATA SHARING.......................... 177
FIGURE 6.16 RANKING OF DRIVERS FOR LGA PARTICIPATION IN DATA SHARING ........................... 178
FIGURE 6.17 EXISTING FORMAL AGREEMENTS USED BY LGAS FOR COLLABORATION .................... 179
FIGURE 6.18 VALUE OF THE DATA SHARING ARRANGEMENT TO THEIR ORGANISATION................... 180
FIGURE 6.19 HAS THE DATA SHARING PARTNERSHIP IMPROVED DATA QUALITY? ........................... 181
FIGURE 6.20 IS THE DATA SHARE OF EQUAL BENEFIT TO BOTH ORGANISATIONS? ........................... 181
FIGURE 6.21 PERSPECTIVE ON THE VALUE OF EACH PARTNER’S CONTRIBUTION ............................. 182
FIGURE 6.22 OVERALL LEVEL OF SATISFACTION WITH DATA SHARING PARTNERSHIP ..................... 183
FIGURE 6.23 FACTOR AND REGRESSION ANALYSIS PROCESS .......................................................... 187
FIGURE 7.1 MODEL DEVELOPMENT PROCESS ................................................................................. 198
FIGURE 7.2 CLASSIFICATION OF ISSUES ......................................................................................... 200
FIGURE 7.3 SPATIAL DATA SHARING PARTNERSHIP MODEL ............................................................ 201
FIGURE 7.4 JURISDICTIONAL AND INSTITUTIONAL RELATIONSHIPS................................................. 202
FIGURE 7.5 OUTCOMES COMPONENT OF MODEL............................................................................. 209
xiii