13.01.2013 Views

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

5.3.6 Key Outcomes<br />

Chapter 5 – Results of <strong>Partnership</strong> Case Studies at <strong>State</strong> <strong>Government</strong> Level<br />

The partnership has delivered modest outcomes since it was established, however recent<br />

progress has been positive. The data from the partnership has recently been used to<br />

contribute to the national geocoded address file (G-NAF) and it is anticipated that this<br />

process will act as a motivator for improving the partnership performance. The data is<br />

currently being used internally, but it is expected that it will be used to support a public<br />

web portal. The new information portal called Information Queensland is expected to be<br />

on-line later in 2006.<br />

5.3.7 Case Summary<br />

The case study of the Queensland Property Location Index has identified a number of<br />

important characteristics of this data sharing arrangement. The initial goal and objectives<br />

of the PLI were not clear, and as the project developed, there was no long term strategy for<br />

the maintenance and use of the data. Although the initial agreement was called a data<br />

share agreement, the contracts reflected a data provision arrangement in return for a<br />

nominal fee. Little had changed from past policies on the access and pricing of<br />

information and there was significant discontent within local government ranks because of<br />

the need to still purchase the digital cadastral database.<br />

The development of the new data share agreement following the new pricing and access<br />

policy in 2004, was a defining moment in the partnership arrangement. The new<br />

agreements resulted in a more equitable data sharing strategy and saw the immediate<br />

upswing in support by local governments.<br />

The project management and operation of the total PLI process is shared across two state<br />

government departments and amongst three organisational units. Communication is<br />

therefore problematic within the project group, and potentially confusing to local<br />

government representatives. Performance reporting and measurement has only recently<br />

commenced, but is a positive step in understanding the challenges facing the project.<br />

5.4 The <strong>State</strong> of Tasmania – The Land Information System<br />

Tasmania<br />

The data sharing partnership under investigation in the <strong>State</strong> of Tasmania commenced in<br />

1997. Its objective was to improve the quality of the state’s spatial information, reduce<br />

duplication and improve its accessibility across government, business and the community.<br />

The Land Information System Tasmania, or the LIST as it became commonly known, was<br />

a ‘whole of government’ initiative which has translated a vision into a reality.<br />

139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!