A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A Local-State Spatial Data Sharing Partnership Model to Facilitate SDI Development Q1j: How would you classify the level of management support that the GIS unit receives within the organisation? � No Support � Limited Support � Satisfactory Support � Good Support � Very Good Support Q1k: The geographic information system is well resourced within the organisation � Strongly Disagree � Disagree � Neither � Agree � Strongly Agree Other Comments: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………….. Part 2 - Policy on Use of Spatial Data This part of the questionnaire examines your local government’s policies regarding access and pricing of spatial data. Q2a: Internal users e.g council employees are required to sign a formal license agreement before GIS or spatial data before it will be provided. � Always � Most of the time � Sometimes � Rarely � Never Q2b: External users e.g developers, consultants, etc are required to sign a formal license agreement before GIS or spatial data before it will be provided. � Always � Most of the time � Sometimes � Rarely � Never Q2c: Restrictions are placed on the use of council’s spatial data � Always � Most of the time � Sometimes � Rarely � Never Q2d: Council’s current information policies encourages the use of your organisation’s spatial data by council staff � Strongly Disagree � Disagree � Neither � Agree � Strongly Agree Q2e: Council’s current information policies encourages the use of your organisation’s spatial data by external users or organisations. � Strongly Disagree � Disagree � Neither � Agree � Strongly Agree Q2f: Does your organisation expect to recover revenue when you provide spatial data to external users? � no, rarely charge for data � yes, cost of provision only � yes, seek to recover some costs � yes, full cost recovery Q2g: Does your organisation generally charge state government agencies when you provide them with spatial data? � yes � no 262
263 Appendix 3 - Local Government Questionnaire Q2h: Legal liability is limiting your council in providing external access to your spatial data e.g. concerns over accuracy or reliability � Strongly Disagree � Disagree � Neither � Agree � Strongly Agree Q2i: State government copyright limits your council in providing external access to digital spatial data products generated from your GIS � Strongly Disagree � Disagree � Neither � Agree � Strongly Agree Q2j: Privacy issues are limiting your council in providing external access to your spatial data � Strongly Disagree � Disagree � Neither � Agree � Strongly Agree Other Comments: …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… ………………………………………………………………………………….. Part 3 – Access to Spatial Data This area of the questionnaire will examine your organisation’s arrangements for accessing spatial data. Q3a: What is the most common way for internal users find the mapping and spatial information they need? � ringing up and asking your office � via the inhouse GIS system � using the internet or external data directory � other, please specify…………………………………… Q3b: What is the most common way external clients find the mapping and spatial information they need? � ringing up and asking your office � using an external data directory � using the internet eg web map of your GIS � other, please specify………………………………………. Q3c: Staff across council have a good knowledge regarding what spatial information you hold � Strongly Disagree � Disagree � Neither � Agree � Strongly Agree Q3d: What percentage of your council’s staff access the GIS on a regular basis? � 90%
Page 1:
A Local-State Government Spatial Da
Page 5 and 6:
Abstract In the past decade efforts
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements Completion of a Ph
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents DECLARATION .....
Page 11 and 12:
APPENDIX 5 - INTER-STATE DIFFERENCE
Page 13 and 14:
FIGURE 6.7 USE OF WEB MAPPING .....
Page 15 and 16:
List of Acronyms ACT AUSTRALIAN CAP
Page 17 and 18:
Operational Definitions The followi
Page 19 and 20:
1 Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 1
Page 21 and 22:
1.1 Background to Research 3 Chapte
Page 23 and 24:
5 Chapter 1 - Introduction is havin
Page 25 and 26:
7 Chapter 1 - Introduction enforcem
Page 27 and 28:
9 Chapter 1 - Introduction The rese
Page 29 and 30:
11 Chapter 1 - Introduction organis
Page 31 and 32:
13 Chapter 1 - Introduction three c
Page 33 and 34:
15 Chapter 2 - Spatial Data and SDI
Page 35 and 36:
2.1 Introduction 17 Chapter 2 - Spa
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
2.2.6 Property Information as a Fun
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 3 - Collaboration, Partners
Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 - Collab
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Dimensions Actors Lower ranking mem
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
91 Chapter 4 - Research Design and
Page 111 and 112:
4.1 Introduction 93 Chapter 4 - Res
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Chapter 5 - Results of Partnership
Page 135 and 136:
5.1 Introduction Chapter 5 - Result
Page 137 and 138:
Employees '000s 500.0 450.0 400.0 3
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Data Exchange Process Chapter 5 - R
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
5.3.6 Key Outcomes Chapter 5 - Resu
Page 159 and 160:
Employees '000s 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
6.1 Introduction Chapter 6 - Result
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Percent 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Equality in Collaborations Chapter
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
% of LGAs For Each State 60.0% 40.0
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
195 Chapter 7 - Model Development a
Page 215 and 216:
7.1 Introduction 197 Chapter 7 - Mo
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
7.3 The Data Sharing Partnership Mo
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Partnership Management Partnership
Page 227 and 228:
Performance Monitoring 209 Chapter
Page 229 and 230: 211 Chapter 7 - Model Development a
Page 233 and 234: 7.4.4 Assessment of the Outcome Com
Page 235 and 236: SDI Component - Standards Access Ne
Page 241 and 242: 223 Conclusions and Implications 8
Page 243 and 244: 8.1 Introduction 225 Conclusions an
Page 245 and 246: 227 Conclusions and Implications 8.
Page 247 and 248: 229 Conclusions and Implications ca
Page 249 and 250: 231 Conclusions and Implications pa
Page 251 and 252: References 233 References Reference
Page 253 and 254: 235 References Cameron, D 2001, 'Th
Page 255 and 256: 237 References Department of Foreig
Page 257 and 258: 239 References Hesse, WJ & Williams
Page 259 and 260: 241 References Masser, I 2002, Repo
Page 261 and 262: 243 References Onsrud, HJ & Rushton
Page 263 and 264: Tashakkori, A & Teddlie, C (eds) 20
Page 265 and 266: 247 References
Page 267 and 268: Appendix 1 - Publications Relating
Page 269 and 270: Appendix 1 - Publications Relating
Page 271 and 272: Appendix 2 - Semi Structured Interv
Page 273 and 274: Appendix 2 - Semi Structured Interv
Page 275 and 276: Appendix 3 257 Appendix 3 - Local G
Page 277 and 278: 259 Appendix 3 - Local Government Q
Page 279: Part 1 - Your Organisation 261 Appe
Page 283 and 284: Q4e: The costs to acquire State gov
Page 285 and 286: Part 6 - About People 267 Appendix
Page 291 and 292: Appendix4 - Open Ended Questionnair
Page 307 and 308: 54 Provision of Aerial photos at a
Page 311 and 312: APPENDIX 5 293 Appendix 5 - Inter-S
Page 313 and 314: ANOVA ANALYSIS 295 Appendix 5 - Int
Page 315 and 316: 297 Appendix 5 - Inter-State Differ
Page 317 and 318: Kruskal Wallis Test Statistics(a,b)
Page 319 and 320: APPENDIX 6 FACTOR ANALYSIS 301 Appe
Page 321 and 322: Communalities 303 Appendix 6 - Fact
Page 323 and 324: 305 Component Matrix(a) Component A
Page 325 and 326: APPENDIX 7 307 Appendix 7 - Correla
Page 327 and 328: Size_Index Org_support Ext_access_p
Page 329 and 330: APPENDIX 8 311 Appendix 8 - Multipl
Page 331 and 332:
Variables Entered/Removed(b) Model
show all

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?