A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A Local-State Spatial Data Sharing Partnership Model to Facilitate SDI Development Percent 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 10.0% 0.0% Always Mostly Sometimes Restrict Use of Data 166 Rarely Never State QLD TAS VIC Figure 6.5 Are restrictions placed on the use of spatial data to external organisations? LGAs were also asked whether the use of spatial information was encouraged both within the LGA and externally. A high proportion of LGAs (75%) indicated that the use of spatial information was encouraged within the organisation, but only 23% encouraged or promoted its use to external organisations. Pricing and Cost Recovery The issue of charging and cost recovery provided a range of responses from the local governments. Most LGAs (56%) responded that they do not charge for their spatial data, whilst a further 19% charged a fee to cover the cost of provision only, and the remaining 25% were seeking to recover some additional costs (see Figure 6.6). Percent 80.0% 60.0% 40.0% 20.0% 0.0% Don't Charge Cost of Provision Cost Recovery Recover Some Costs Figure 6.6 Attitude to cost recovery State QLD TAS VIC The difference in attitude towards cost recovery varies significantly across the LGAs in the three states. In Victoria, almost 75% of LGAs indicated that they rarely charge for data,
Chapter 6 – Results of Partnership Case Studies at Local Government Level whilst approximately 65% of Queensland LGAs more commonly charge data at the cost of provision or to generate some income. This may be partially explained by the fact that true sharing of spatial data between local and state governments is still relatively new in Queensland (less than 18 months). A number of LGAs were still being charged for state data sets, such as the digital cadastral mapbase, at the time of the survey. This finding indicates that LGAs are likely to adopt or copy the state government’s application of policy. When LGAs were asked if they charge the state government for the provision of data, almost all local governments (92%) indicated that they do not. The remaining 8% of LGAs were from Queensland which again supports the proposition that being charged for data can encourage a “tit for tat” approach to charging. Privacy, Legal Liability and Copyright Although the issues of privacy, legal liability and copyright were identified as having an impact on the LGA’s decision to share their data externally, the overall influence of these issues on the LGAs policies was inconclusive. Most LGAs commented that they could manage privacy and copyright issues, but had a greater concern regarding the potential misuse of their data, and therefore their consequential liability. 6.2.4 Accessing and Locating Spatial Data Part 3 of the questionnaire explored the methods used by LGAs for making their spatial data accessible to both internal and external users. Accessing Spatial Data for Internal Users On the question of how internal users access and find the spatial information they require, 86% of respondents indicated that their internal users find and access the organisation’s spatial data through the in-house GIS or intranet. A further 14% of LGAs identified that direct telephone contact was the next most common means for internal users to find the spatial data they require. GIS is now used widely across most LGAs with approximately 30-40% of staff in LGAs having access to GIS at their desktops.. Accessing Spatial Data for External Users For external clients seeking to access spatial information, the situation was almost reversed. Approximately 84% of external clients locate the spatial data they require by telephoning the GIS officer in the LGA. Only 13% of LGAs indicated that external clients used the internet to find data, whilst another 3% of LGAs indicated that their data could be located by external clients through an external data directory such as the Australian Spatial 167
Page 1:
A Local-State Government Spatial Da
Page 5 and 6:
Abstract In the past decade efforts
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements Completion of a Ph
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents DECLARATION .....
Page 11 and 12:
APPENDIX 5 - INTER-STATE DIFFERENCE
Page 13 and 14:
FIGURE 6.7 USE OF WEB MAPPING .....
Page 15 and 16:
List of Acronyms ACT AUSTRALIAN CAP
Page 17 and 18:
Operational Definitions The followi
Page 19 and 20:
1 Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 1
Page 21 and 22:
1.1 Background to Research 3 Chapte
Page 23 and 24:
5 Chapter 1 - Introduction is havin
Page 25 and 26:
7 Chapter 1 - Introduction enforcem
Page 27 and 28:
9 Chapter 1 - Introduction The rese
Page 29 and 30:
11 Chapter 1 - Introduction organis
Page 31 and 32:
13 Chapter 1 - Introduction three c
Page 33 and 34:
15 Chapter 2 - Spatial Data and SDI
Page 35 and 36:
2.1 Introduction 17 Chapter 2 - Spa
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
2.2.6 Property Information as a Fun
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 3 - Collaboration, Partners
Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 - Collab
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Dimensions Actors Lower ranking mem
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
91 Chapter 4 - Research Design and
Page 111 and 112:
4.1 Introduction 93 Chapter 4 - Res
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 5 - Results of Partnership
Page 135 and 136: 5.1 Introduction Chapter 5 - Result
Page 137 and 138: Employees '000s 500.0 450.0 400.0 3
Page 143 and 144: Data Exchange Process Chapter 5 - R
Page 157 and 158: 5.3.6 Key Outcomes Chapter 5 - Resu
Page 159 and 160: Employees '000s 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0
Page 177 and 178: 6.1 Introduction Chapter 6 - Result
Page 183: Chapter 6 - Results of Partnership
Page 187 and 188: Percent 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.
Page 195 and 196: Equality in Collaborations Chapter
Page 199 and 200: % of LGAs For Each State 60.0% 40.0
Page 213 and 214: 195 Chapter 7 - Model Development a
Page 215 and 216: 7.1 Introduction 197 Chapter 7 - Mo
Page 219 and 220: 7.3 The Data Sharing Partnership Mo
Page 225 and 226: Partnership Management Partnership
Page 227 and 228: Performance Monitoring 209 Chapter
Page 233 and 234: 7.4.4 Assessment of the Outcome Com
Page 235 and 236:
SDI Component - Standards Access Ne
Page 237 and 238:
219 Chapter 7 - Model Development a
Page 239 and 240:
221 Chapter 7 - Model Development a
Page 241 and 242:
223 Conclusions and Implications 8
Page 243 and 244:
8.1 Introduction 225 Conclusions an
Page 245 and 246:
227 Conclusions and Implications 8.
Page 247 and 248:
229 Conclusions and Implications ca
Page 249 and 250:
231 Conclusions and Implications pa
Page 251 and 252:
References 233 References Reference
Page 253 and 254:
235 References Cameron, D 2001, 'Th
Page 255 and 256:
237 References Department of Foreig
Page 257 and 258:
239 References Hesse, WJ & Williams
Page 259 and 260:
241 References Masser, I 2002, Repo
Page 261 and 262:
243 References Onsrud, HJ & Rushton
Page 263 and 264:
Tashakkori, A & Teddlie, C (eds) 20
Page 265 and 266:
247 References
Page 267 and 268:
Appendix 1 - Publications Relating
Page 269 and 270:
Appendix 1 - Publications Relating
Page 271 and 272:
Appendix 2 - Semi Structured Interv
Page 273 and 274:
Appendix 2 - Semi Structured Interv
Page 275 and 276:
Appendix 3 257 Appendix 3 - Local G
Page 277 and 278:
259 Appendix 3 - Local Government Q
Page 279 and 280:
Part 1 - Your Organisation 261 Appe
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Q4e: The costs to acquire State gov
Page 285 and 286:
Part 6 - About People 267 Appendix
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Appendix4 - Open Ended Questionnair
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
54 Provision of Aerial photos at a
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
APPENDIX 5 293 Appendix 5 - Inter-S
Page 313 and 314:
ANOVA ANALYSIS 295 Appendix 5 - Int
Page 315 and 316:
297 Appendix 5 - Inter-State Differ
Page 317 and 318:
Kruskal Wallis Test Statistics(a,b)
Page 319 and 320:
APPENDIX 6 FACTOR ANALYSIS 301 Appe
Page 321 and 322:
Communalities 303 Appendix 6 - Fact
Page 323 and 324:
305 Component Matrix(a) Component A
Page 325 and 326:
APPENDIX 7 307 Appendix 7 - Correla
Page 327 and 328:
Size_Index Org_support Ext_access_p
Page 329 and 330:
APPENDIX 8 311 Appendix 8 - Multipl
Page 331 and 332:
Variables Entered/Removed(b) Model
show all

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?