13.01.2013 Views

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A <strong>Local</strong>-<strong>State</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Sharing</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> Model to Facilitate SDI Development<br />

(Car 1998), understanding human cognitive processes (Timpf & Frank 1997) and the<br />

aggregation and interpolation of administrative boundaries (Eagleson et al. 1999).<br />

From a SDI perspective the parallels with political and administrative systems can be seen<br />

in the SDI development (Chan & Williamson 1999). Rajabifard et al. (2000) proposed that<br />

these hierarchical systems of SDIs should be viewed from two perspectives: an umbrella<br />

view from the global level looking down and a building block view where each level of<br />

development supports the higher levels of development.<br />

Global Planning<br />

Regional Planning<br />

National Planning<br />

<strong>State</strong> Planning<br />

<strong>Local</strong> Planning<br />

Figure 2.6 Hierachical nature of SDI (Rajabifard et al. 2002)<br />

A useful perspective with respect to this research is the authors’ view of the relationship<br />

between the different levels of SDI from the corporate to the global level and the<br />

corresponding level of data detail. In particular, the linkage and relationship of the data<br />

flows as illustrated in Figure 2.6. Sub-national SDIs rely on collecting detailed<br />

information from the local level to support the delivery of state government services and to<br />

support state planning.<br />

However, although the properties of hierarchical systems might be essential for the<br />

development of a consistent database or data structure, the absence of a strict hierarchical<br />

structure does not necessarily inhibit SDI development and implementation (Masser 2005).<br />

For example national bodies such as FGDC work directly with local governments without<br />

reference to the state level.<br />

2.4.6 Sub-National SDI and the Private Sector<br />

As described earlier, the first generation of SDI initiatives progressed through national<br />

government agencies by a process of policy and standards development. However, the<br />

focus in recent years has moved from the national to sub-national levels involving state<br />

and local governments. This section will briefly highlight some of the issues and progress<br />

in this area of SDI development.<br />

Less detailed data<br />

More detailed<br />

40<br />

Global SDI<br />

Regional SDI<br />

National SDI<br />

<strong>State</strong> SDI<br />

<strong>Local</strong> SDI

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!