13.01.2013 Views

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 – Collaboration, <strong>Partnership</strong>s and the <strong>Government</strong> Environment<br />

2. an established procedure for managing the partnership exists, usually in the form<br />

of a written contract; and<br />

3. there is an agreed economic development outcome expected by all parties.<br />

79<br />

(Walzer & York 1998, p. 49)<br />

The sharing of risk and benefits also enable governments to fund projects such as bridges,<br />

freeways, airports and tunnels with the assistance of the private sector, hence reducing the<br />

upfront cost (Webb & Pulle 2002). The majority of PPPs in Australia currently exist<br />

between the state government and private companies rather than the national or local<br />

governments. As many of these partnership endeavours are relatively immature, it has<br />

been difficult to gauge their success, and the perspectives of success from the public sector<br />

can be quite different from the private sector. Increasingly, methods of evaluation should<br />

not only incorporate both public and private partners, but also the community stakeholders<br />

who are usually the key users of the PPP outcome (Lichfield 1998).<br />

<strong>Government</strong> to <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong>s (G2G)<br />

Around the world the use of partnerships within and across governments are prolific, and<br />

include the sharing of facilities, sharing of information, joint delivery of services, e-<br />

business and e-governments services, environmental management, planning, and<br />

infrastructure development. In the United Kingdom, the government has encouraged<br />

partnerships to improve efficiencies and intergovernmental relations between the central<br />

and local governments. For example, the Central and <strong>Local</strong> <strong>Government</strong> Information<br />

<strong>Partnership</strong> was set up to enable central and local government to work together to develop<br />

efficient and effective non-financial statistical information (CLIP 2005). The<br />

Leicestershire E-<strong>Government</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> was established by nine local authorities in<br />

Leicestershire to deliver e-government services such as planning, GIS, tourism information<br />

and a youth portal (Leicestershire County Council 2006).<br />

In Canada, Infrastructure Canada coordinates federal efforts on cities and communities and<br />

supports infrastructure investments across the country, through partnerships that meet local<br />

community needs (Infrastructure Canada 2006). In Australia, many of the state<br />

government agencies have established partnership strategies both across state government<br />

agencies and between state and local government. Examples of these include:<br />

• <strong>Government</strong> of Western Australia <strong>State</strong>-<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Government</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong><br />

Agreement;<br />

• South Australian <strong>Government</strong> <strong>State</strong>-<strong>Local</strong> <strong>Government</strong> Relations Agreement;

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!