13.01.2013 Views

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>Local</strong>-<strong>State</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Sharing</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> Model to Facilitate SDI Development<br />

private sector applications, the view of collaborative efforts in the public sector is very<br />

important.<br />

Collaboration for public service delivery is defined by Prefontaine et al. (2000, p. 6) as<br />

“the reciprocal and voluntary support that two or more distinct public sector agencies, or<br />

public and private administrations, including non-profit organisations (NPOs), provide<br />

each other in order to deliver a public service, i.e. one that is part of the government<br />

mission”. This definition emphasises the need for reciprocal support from both agencies<br />

and the common goal of delivering a public service. Care is needed that the application of<br />

business management principles to government priorities and operations do not override<br />

the traditional tenet of “public service or public good”.<br />

Lawrence et al. (2002) defined collaboration as a cooperative, inter-organisational<br />

relationship that relies on neither market nor hierarchical mechanisms of control but is<br />

instead negotiated through an ongoing communicative process. For the purpose of this<br />

research the definition used by Gray is adopted with the understanding that collaboration<br />

should be seen as a continuum that involves both co-operation and co-ordination as<br />

identified by Mulford and Rogers (1982).<br />

3.2.2 Why Do Organisations Collaborate?<br />

The understandings from current literature as to why organisations collaborate are broad<br />

ranging and often reflect the individual environment or domain being investigated. A<br />

range of literature identified that the likelihood of collaboration increases during a time of<br />

crisis or difficulty i.e. resource shortages (Gray 1985; Halpert 1982; Mulford & Rogers<br />

1982; Oliver 1990; Schermerhorn 1975).<br />

Schermerhorn (1975, pp. 848-9) suggested that organisations will seek out or be receptive<br />

to inter-organisational cooperation when “faced with situations of resource scarcity or<br />

performance distress, the cooperation per se takes on a positive value, or a powerful<br />

extra-organisational force demands this activity”. Schermerhorn also argues that once the<br />

decision to co-operate is made, there are a range of other considerations or costs associated<br />

with inter-organisational co-operation including organisational image, resource<br />

requirements, domain considerations and support capacities that need to be considered.<br />

Oliver (1990) proposed six critical contingencies of relationship formation as generalisable<br />

determinants of collaboration across organisations as necessity, asymmetry, reciprocity,<br />

efficiency, stability and legitimacy. These determinants are the causes that prompt or<br />

motivate inter-organisational relations. Each determinant may be enough to prompt the<br />

60

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!