13.01.2013 Views

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>Local</strong>-<strong>State</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Sharing</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> Model to Facilitate SDI Development<br />

Therefore, it is important that the outcomes of the data sharing partnership be defined in<br />

terms of measurable benefits to the organisations, business and the community. One of the<br />

important aspects of this research was to identify the relationship of data sharing<br />

partnerships to SDI development. Although SDI development is not the only outcome of<br />

the spatial data sharing partnerships, it is one that has a long lasting and multiplying<br />

impact through the continued re-use of the information infrastructure.<br />

7.4 Model Application and Evaluation<br />

7.4.1 Evaluation Methodology<br />

In order to evaluate the potential of the model it was decided to test the application of the<br />

model using the three case studies. The primary advantage of testing the model against the<br />

three case studies was that detailed empirical evidence was already available on each of<br />

the partnerships. The evaluation process consisted of assessing the impact of each<br />

component of the model for the three case studies. Rather than assessing the impact of<br />

each partnership using an arbitrary point scale, the methodology chosen was to simply<br />

assess each model sub-component as making a positive contribution (+), negligible<br />

contribution (o) or a negative contribution (-) to the partnership outcomes.<br />

This assessment process was considered to be objective as the judgements on the positive<br />

or negative contributions were supported by both quantitative and qualitative evidence<br />

from the case studies and survey. In addition, it was decided that the cumulative effect of<br />

these individual assessment of the sub-components minimised the impact of any subjective<br />

judgement.<br />

7.4.2 Assessment of Contextual Factors<br />

The jurisdictional and institutional environments can have a significant impact on the<br />

establishment and sustainability of collaborative initiatives. Most commonly local-state<br />

government partnerships are established by a single state government agency directly with<br />

one or more local governments. The institutional arrangements within that state or local<br />

government agency will often have a direct influence on the policies and operations of the<br />

partnership. To a lesser extent the political or jurisdictional environment will have an<br />

influence on the institutional or organisational policies and operations. Although many of<br />

these impacts are implicitly recognised by those individuals or groups who are forming the<br />

partnerships, it is often helpful to understand the potential of these impacts prior to<br />

development of a partnership model. A summary of the impact of the jurisdictional and<br />

institutional environments is given in Table 7.2.<br />

210

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!