13.01.2013 Views

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 3 – Collaboration, <strong>Partnership</strong>s and the <strong>Government</strong> Environment<br />

The models of pooled and reciprocal interdependence are of particular interest with respect<br />

to spatial data sharing partnerships between local and state jurisdictions. These models<br />

support the notion of standardisation, formal agreements and the need for mutual<br />

adjustment in an often dynamic environment. An understanding of the technologies,<br />

structure of collaborative arrangement, the type of inter-organisational systems (IOS) and<br />

the potential for conflict is also important in the often heterogeneous environment of local<br />

government.<br />

3.2.6 Process of Collaboration<br />

From the literature it is evident that the process of collaboration is often difficult to<br />

describe within a “one size fits all” process, however there are a number of common issues<br />

that re-occur and conform to a sequence of events. Gray (1989) proposed that the<br />

collaborative process could be examined as a three phase process which would include<br />

problem setting, direction setting and implementation. Table 3.4 illustrates the details of<br />

this process.<br />

Table 3.4 The Collaborative Process (Gray 1989, p. 57)<br />

Phase 1: Problem Setting Common definition of problem<br />

Commitment to collaborate<br />

Identification of stakeholders<br />

Legitimacy of stakeholders<br />

Convenor characteristics<br />

Identification of resources<br />

Phase 2: Direction Setting Establishing ground rules<br />

Agenda setting<br />

Organising sub-groups<br />

Joint information search<br />

Exploring options<br />

Reaching agreement and closing the deal<br />

Phase 3: Implementation Dealing with constituencies<br />

Building external support<br />

Structuring<br />

Monitoring the agreement and ensuring<br />

compliance<br />

Gray argues that the phases may vary from collaboration to collaboration and that some<br />

stages may need to be extended whilst others can be reduced. The first stage normally<br />

requires a clear identification of the problem (or opportunity) as the first step. This is<br />

followed by a more detailed investigation of the context of the problem including<br />

identifying the stakeholders, resources, timing, possible outcomes and levels of<br />

participation before any agreement to proceed further. The second phase enters a more<br />

detailed level of planning to establish the ground rules, sharing of strategic information,<br />

identifying the steps to build the collaboration, project planning and finally a formal<br />

71

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!