A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A Local-State Spatial Data Sharing Partnership Model to Facilitate SDI Development array of data sets that exist. DPIWE is the custodian of many of the LIST data sets, including the land titles and DCDB, however much of the day to day maintenance is the responsibility of other state agencies. In addition to the maintenance group, the LIST Client Services Group manages the provision of data to third parties through licensing and sales. Communication Communication with LGAs is performed on an “as needs” basis and may be undertaken by a range of staff within the State Government department. The primary forms of communication are email and telephone, with the primary focus on routine operational issues dealing with the data exchange processes. No other coordinated communication process has been established, but with the LIST process well coordinated this may not be necessary. Reporting and Performance Management During the data integration a report is generated on the data matching rates and errors. However, no formal system of performance management was evident which examined the progress of the project as a whole. Although the matching rates and data quality measures provide a valuable guide to the completeness and reliability of the data sets, as the project matures there is a need to extend the dimensions of this reporting in order to effect improvements in areas such as efficiency, data turn around, bottlenecks, standards and interoperability. 5.4.5 Governance Initially, the LIST concept was driven by the Land Information Coordination Committee (LICC) which facilitated the inter-agency communication, development and refinement of the data access, pricing and licensing arrangements and overall project reporting. As the project matured into an operational program a new management and governance structure was put in place to facilitate broader representation of the stakeholders and reporting (see Figure 5.9). One of the key changes to the overall governance was the establishment of the LIST Management Advisory Group (LMAG) which became responsible for the overall management and direction of LIST. As the LIST data sets began to expand across the various state and local government agencies, the LMAG provided a more appropriate and inclusive management structure for operational management and direction setting. It enabled the managers across the different agencies to be kept informed on the progress of 146
Chapter 5 – Results of Partnership Case Studies at State Government Level the LIST, and facilitated group decisions which impacted on significant operational issues. Day to day operations of the LIST is the responsibility of the LIST Operations Group. Figure 5.9 LIST governance and reporting structure (Twinn 2001) The role of the Land Information Coordination Committee has continued to focus on policy development and custodian appointment. However, with the development of the LMAG, there was less emphasis on operational issues and more effort on encouraging high level support and development. 5.4.6 Key Outcomes The LIST partnership has achieved a range of outcomes including: • development of effective policies on access and pricing; • a single authoritative data set for spatial information; • reduced duplication of mapping activities; • a standard data exchange process; • a web based delivery system that is used widely by LGAs and the public; and • improved intergovernmental relations and trust. The LIST data sharing and management model has been extremely successful for the State of Tasmania and has become a critical component of the information infrastructure for government, business and the community. 5.4.7 Case Summary The LIST continues to be a successful partnership initiative and has delivered significant benefits across both state and local government. The partnerships were initiated in a turbulent economic and jurisdictional environment which encouraged improved intergovernmental relations through more efficient use of resources. The project had high 147
Page 1:
A Local-State Government Spatial Da
Page 5 and 6:
Abstract In the past decade efforts
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements Completion of a Ph
Page 9 and 10:
Table of Contents DECLARATION .....
Page 11 and 12:
APPENDIX 5 - INTER-STATE DIFFERENCE
Page 13 and 14:
FIGURE 6.7 USE OF WEB MAPPING .....
Page 15 and 16:
List of Acronyms ACT AUSTRALIAN CAP
Page 17 and 18:
Operational Definitions The followi
Page 19 and 20:
1 Chapter 1 Introduction Chapter 1
Page 21 and 22:
1.1 Background to Research 3 Chapte
Page 23 and 24:
5 Chapter 1 - Introduction is havin
Page 25 and 26:
7 Chapter 1 - Introduction enforcem
Page 27 and 28:
9 Chapter 1 - Introduction The rese
Page 29 and 30:
11 Chapter 1 - Introduction organis
Page 31 and 32:
13 Chapter 1 - Introduction three c
Page 33 and 34:
15 Chapter 2 - Spatial Data and SDI
Page 35 and 36:
2.1 Introduction 17 Chapter 2 - Spa
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
2.2.6 Property Information as a Fun
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 3 - Collaboration, Partners
Page 75 and 76:
3.1 Introduction Chapter 3 - Collab
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Dimensions Actors Lower ranking mem
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
91 Chapter 4 - Research Design and
Page 111 and 112:
4.1 Introduction 93 Chapter 4 - Res
Page 113 and 114: 95 Chapter 4 - Research Design and
Page 133 and 134: Chapter 5 - Results of Partnership
Page 135 and 136: 5.1 Introduction Chapter 5 - Result
Page 137 and 138: Employees '000s 500.0 450.0 400.0 3
Page 143 and 144: Data Exchange Process Chapter 5 - R
Page 157 and 158: 5.3.6 Key Outcomes Chapter 5 - Resu
Page 159 and 160: Employees '000s 60.0 50.0 40.0 30.0
Page 163: Chapter 5 - Results of Partnership
Page 177 and 178: 6.1 Introduction Chapter 6 - Result
Page 187 and 188: Percent 60.0% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.
Page 195 and 196: Equality in Collaborations Chapter
Page 199 and 200: % of LGAs For Each State 60.0% 40.0
Page 213 and 214: 195 Chapter 7 - Model Development a
Page 215 and 216:
7.1 Introduction 197 Chapter 7 - Mo
Page 217 and 218:
199 Chapter 7 - Model Development a
Page 219 and 220:
7.3 The Data Sharing Partnership Mo
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Partnership Management Partnership
Page 227 and 228:
Performance Monitoring 209 Chapter
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
7.4.4 Assessment of the Outcome Com
Page 235 and 236:
SDI Component - Standards Access Ne
Page 237 and 238:
Page 239 and 240:
Page 241 and 242:
223 Conclusions and Implications 8
Page 243 and 244:
8.1 Introduction 225 Conclusions an
Page 245 and 246:
227 Conclusions and Implications 8.
Page 247 and 248:
229 Conclusions and Implications ca
Page 249 and 250:
231 Conclusions and Implications pa
Page 251 and 252:
References 233 References Reference
Page 253 and 254:
235 References Cameron, D 2001, 'Th
Page 255 and 256:
237 References Department of Foreig
Page 257 and 258:
239 References Hesse, WJ & Williams
Page 259 and 260:
241 References Masser, I 2002, Repo
Page 261 and 262:
243 References Onsrud, HJ & Rushton
Page 263 and 264:
Tashakkori, A & Teddlie, C (eds) 20
Page 265 and 266:
247 References
Page 267 and 268:
Appendix 1 - Publications Relating
Page 269 and 270:
Appendix 1 - Publications Relating
Page 271 and 272:
Appendix 2 - Semi Structured Interv
Page 273 and 274:
Appendix 2 - Semi Structured Interv
Page 275 and 276:
Appendix 3 257 Appendix 3 - Local G
Page 277 and 278:
259 Appendix 3 - Local Government Q
Page 279 and 280:
Part 1 - Your Organisation 261 Appe
Page 281 and 282:
Page 283 and 284:
Q4e: The costs to acquire State gov
Page 285 and 286:
Part 6 - About People 267 Appendix
Page 287 and 288:
Page 289 and 290:
Page 291 and 292:
Appendix4 - Open Ended Questionnair
Page 293 and 294:
Page 295 and 296:
Page 297 and 298:
Page 299 and 300:
Page 301 and 302:
Page 303 and 304:
Page 305 and 306:
Page 307 and 308:
54 Provision of Aerial photos at a
Page 309 and 310:
Page 311 and 312:
APPENDIX 5 293 Appendix 5 - Inter-S
Page 313 and 314:
ANOVA ANALYSIS 295 Appendix 5 - Int
Page 315 and 316:
297 Appendix 5 - Inter-State Differ
Page 317 and 318:
Kruskal Wallis Test Statistics(a,b)
Page 319 and 320:
APPENDIX 6 FACTOR ANALYSIS 301 Appe
Page 321 and 322:
Communalities 303 Appendix 6 - Fact
Page 323 and 324:
305 Component Matrix(a) Component A
Page 325 and 326:
APPENDIX 7 307 Appendix 7 - Correla
Page 327 and 328:
Size_Index Org_support Ext_access_p
Page 329 and 330:
APPENDIX 8 311 Appendix 8 - Multipl
Page 331 and 332:
Variables Entered/Removed(b) Model
show all

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?