A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

List of Tables
TABLE 2.1 DEVELOPMENT PARALLELS BETWEEN NIIS AND NSDIS.................................................. 35
TABLE 2.2 DIFFERING PERSPECTIVES OF SDI................................................................................... 37
TABLE 2.3 COMPONENTS OF SDI (AFTER WARNEST 2005)............................................................... 38
TABLE 2.4 DATA SHARING TAXONOMY (CALKINS & WEATHERBE 1995, P. 71) ............................... 47
TABLE 2.5 SUMMARY OF DATA SHARING MODELS.......................................................................... 50
TABLE 2.6 SUMMARY OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH FINDINGS FOR DATA SHARING AND SDI
DEVELOPMENT........................................................................................................................ 51
TABLE 3.1 A COMPARISON OF COOPERATION AND COORDINATION PROCESSES (MULFORD AND
ROGERS, 1982, P.13) .............................................................................................................. 59
TABLE 3.2 COLLABORATION CONTINUUM (DEDEKORKUT 2004, P. 5) .............................................. 67
TABLE 3.3 INTERDEPENDENCE, STRUCTURE AND POTENTIAL FOR CONFLICT (KUMAR & VAN DISSEL
1996, P. 287) .......................................................................................................................... 70
TABLE 3.4 THE COLLABORATIVE PROCESS (GRAY 1989, P. 57)...................................................... 71
TABLE 3.5 CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS IN COLLABORATION FOR PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY
(PREFONTAINE ET AL 2000) .................................................................................................... 73
TABLE 3.6 COMPARISON OF HIERARCHICAL ORGANISATIONS AND PARTNERSHIPS (BERGQUIST ET AL.
1995, P. 20) ............................................................................................................................ 80
TABLE 3.7 AUSTRALIAN STATISTICS 2005 (SOURCE: ABS 2006) .................................................... 82
TABLE 4.1 MIXED METHOD DESIGN TYPES (CRESWELL ET AL. 2003, P. 224) .................................. 101
TABLE 4.2 RESPONSE RATE AS A PERCENTAGE OF LGAS ............................................................... 110
TABLE 4.3 RESPONSE RATE AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE NUMBER OF PROPERTIES ............................. 110
TABLE 5.1 ASSESSMENT OF DETERMINANTS FOR INITIATING DATA SHARING PARTNERSHIP ............ 149
TABLE 5.2 COMPARISON OF THE PERFORMANCE OF THE PARTNERSHIPS ......................................... 150
TABLE 5.3 CONTRIBUTION OF PARTNERSHIPS TO SDI DEVELOPMENT............................................. 152
TABLE 6.1 STRUCTURE OF THE LGA QUESTIONNAIRE ................................................................... 160
TABLE 6.2 LARGEST, SMALLEST AND MEDIAN SIZE OF LGAS IN SURVEY ....................................... 161
TABLE 6.3 VARIABLES THAT ILLUSTRATE SIGNIFICANT INTER-STATE DIFFERENCE (P