13.01.2013 Views

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

A <strong>Local</strong>-<strong>State</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Sharing</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> Model to Facilitate SDI Development<br />

Table 2.2 illustrates that most of the definitions emphasise the core elements that comprise<br />

a SDI include data, people, access mechanisms, standards and policies. In addition<br />

Rajabifard and Williamson (2001) and Groot (2000) emphasise the need for data sharing<br />

and partnerships.<br />

2.4.4 SDI Components<br />

The elements that comprise an information infrastructure, as identified by Carbo (1997) in<br />

section 2.4.3, parallel those put forward by various authors in Table 2.2. The key SDI<br />

components of data, people, policy framework, standards and access/distribution<br />

technology are summarised in Table 2.3.<br />

Table 2.3 Components of SDI (after Warnest 2005)<br />

DATA Fundamental datasets are themes of spatial information regarded as primary in<br />

supporting the key functions of a country or jurisdiction, providing the common<br />

spatial reference and context which underpins many other forms of business<br />

information. An individual agency may consider fundamental data in terms of the<br />

most important strategic spatial information that supports its business functions<br />

and processes.<br />

Themes commonly considered fundamental can include geodetic control,<br />

cadastre, administrative boundaries, geographic names and localities, street<br />

address, transportation, elevation, hydrology and orthophoto imagery. The list is<br />

not definitive and is dependent on the priorities of the responsible agency within<br />

each jurisdiction.<br />

PEOPLE Includes the users, providers, administrators and custodians of spatial data and<br />

also value-added re-sellers. Users can be corporate, small or large business or<br />

individuals, public or private.<br />

INSTITUTIONAL<br />

FRAMEWORK/<br />

POLICY<br />

The broad application of SDI beyond the traditional mapping and land<br />

administration role means users and administrators of spatial information have<br />

very different qualifications and professional backgrounds.<br />

Includes the administration, coordination, policy and legislation components of<br />

an SDI. The institutional framework is reliant on successful partnerships and<br />

communication between agencies within and between jurisdictions.<br />

STANDARDS Consistent standards and policy are required to enable the sharing, integration<br />

and distribution of spatial data; hence standards for data models, metadata,<br />

transfer and interoperability of storage and analysis software. Policy particularly<br />

needs to be consistent for the pricing and access to spatial data within and<br />

between jurisdictions.<br />

ACCESS AND<br />

DISTRIBUTION<br />

TECHNOLOGY<br />

Consists of the access and distribution networks, clearinghouse and other<br />

means for getting the spatial information or datasets to the users. Technology<br />

also involves the acquisition, storage, integration, maintenance, and<br />

enhancement of spatial data.<br />

These SDI components and their inter-relationships may be viewed in a number of ways.<br />

Rajabifard and Williamson (2001) suggest that the fundamental interaction between people<br />

and data is governed by the dynamic technological components of SDI, namely the access<br />

network, policy and standards (see Figure 2.5).<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!