A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership
A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership
A Local-State Government Spatial Data Sharing Partnership
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
A <strong>Local</strong>-<strong>State</strong> <strong>Spatial</strong> <strong>Data</strong> <strong>Sharing</strong> <strong>Partnership</strong> Model to Facilitate SDI Development<br />
Table 2.2 illustrates that most of the definitions emphasise the core elements that comprise<br />
a SDI include data, people, access mechanisms, standards and policies. In addition<br />
Rajabifard and Williamson (2001) and Groot (2000) emphasise the need for data sharing<br />
and partnerships.<br />
2.4.4 SDI Components<br />
The elements that comprise an information infrastructure, as identified by Carbo (1997) in<br />
section 2.4.3, parallel those put forward by various authors in Table 2.2. The key SDI<br />
components of data, people, policy framework, standards and access/distribution<br />
technology are summarised in Table 2.3.<br />
Table 2.3 Components of SDI (after Warnest 2005)<br />
DATA Fundamental datasets are themes of spatial information regarded as primary in<br />
supporting the key functions of a country or jurisdiction, providing the common<br />
spatial reference and context which underpins many other forms of business<br />
information. An individual agency may consider fundamental data in terms of the<br />
most important strategic spatial information that supports its business functions<br />
and processes.<br />
Themes commonly considered fundamental can include geodetic control,<br />
cadastre, administrative boundaries, geographic names and localities, street<br />
address, transportation, elevation, hydrology and orthophoto imagery. The list is<br />
not definitive and is dependent on the priorities of the responsible agency within<br />
each jurisdiction.<br />
PEOPLE Includes the users, providers, administrators and custodians of spatial data and<br />
also value-added re-sellers. Users can be corporate, small or large business or<br />
individuals, public or private.<br />
INSTITUTIONAL<br />
FRAMEWORK/<br />
POLICY<br />
The broad application of SDI beyond the traditional mapping and land<br />
administration role means users and administrators of spatial information have<br />
very different qualifications and professional backgrounds.<br />
Includes the administration, coordination, policy and legislation components of<br />
an SDI. The institutional framework is reliant on successful partnerships and<br />
communication between agencies within and between jurisdictions.<br />
STANDARDS Consistent standards and policy are required to enable the sharing, integration<br />
and distribution of spatial data; hence standards for data models, metadata,<br />
transfer and interoperability of storage and analysis software. Policy particularly<br />
needs to be consistent for the pricing and access to spatial data within and<br />
between jurisdictions.<br />
ACCESS AND<br />
DISTRIBUTION<br />
TECHNOLOGY<br />
Consists of the access and distribution networks, clearinghouse and other<br />
means for getting the spatial information or datasets to the users. Technology<br />
also involves the acquisition, storage, integration, maintenance, and<br />
enhancement of spatial data.<br />
These SDI components and their inter-relationships may be viewed in a number of ways.<br />
Rajabifard and Williamson (2001) suggest that the fundamental interaction between people<br />
and data is governed by the dynamic technological components of SDI, namely the access<br />
network, policy and standards (see Figure 2.5).<br />
38