The Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Benin S., E. Nkonya, G. Okecho, J. Pender, S. Nahdy, S. Mugarura, E. Kato, and G. Kayobyo. 2007. Assessing the Impact of the National Agricultural Advisory Services (NAADS) in the Uganda Rural Livelihoods. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00724. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute. Berkes, F. 2002. “Cross-Scale Institutional Linkage Perspective from the Bottom Up.” In The Dram of the Commons: Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change, edited by O. E. T. Dietz, N. Polsak, P. Stern, S. Stovich, and E. Weber. Washington, DC: Science Academy. ———. 2007. “Community-Based Conservation in a Globalized World.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (39): 15188–15193. Berry, L., J. Olson, and D. Campbell. 2003. “Assessing the Extent, Cost, and Impact of Land Degradation at the National Level.” Findings from seven pilot case studies. Commissioned by Global Mechanism, with support from the World Bank. Berry, S. 1993. No Condition Is Permanent: The Social Dynamics of Agrarian Change in Sub-Saharan Africa. Madison, WI, USA: University of Wisconsin Press. Besley, T. 1995. “Property Rights and Investment Incentives: Theory and Evidence from Ghana.” The Journal of Political Economy 103 (5): 903–937. Bhutta M. N., L.K. Smedema. 2007. One Hundred Years of Waterlogging and Salinity Control in the Indus Valley, Pakistan: A Historical Review. Irrigation and Drainage 56(1):S81–S90. Birendra, K. C., and S. Nagata. 2006. “Refugee Impact on Collective Management of Forest Resources: A Case Study of Bhutanese Refugees in Nepal’s Eastern Terai Region.” Journal of Forest Research 11: 305–311. Bishop, J. 1995. The Economics of Soil Degradation: An Illustration of the Change in Productivity Approach to Valuation in Mali and Malawi. International Institute for Environment and Development, LEEC Discussion Paper 95-02. London: IIED. Bishop, J., and J . Allen. 1989. The On-Site Cost of Soil Erosion in Mali. Environment Working Paper 21. Washington DC: The World Bank. Byiringiro F., and T. Reardon. 1996. “Farm productivity in Rwanda: Effects of Farm Size, Erosion, and Soil Conservation Investments.” Agricultural Economics 15(2): 127–136. Blaikie, P., and H. Brookfield. 1987. Land Degradation and Society. New York: Richard Clay. Blench R., 1999. Extensive Pastoral Livestock Systems: Issues and Options for the Future. FAO. Rome. Bojö, J.. 1991. “The Economics of Land Degradation: Theory and Applications to Lesotho.” The Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm. Bojö, J. 1996. “The Costs of Land Degradation in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Ecological Economics 16: 161–173. Bojö, J. and D. Cassells. 1995. “Land Degradation and Rehabilitation in Ethiopia. A Reassessment.” World Bank. Washington DC. Borlaug, N. E. 2000. The Green Revolution Revisited and the Road Ahead. Special 30th Anniversary Lecture. Oslo: Norwegian Nobel Institute. Börner, J. 2006. “A Bio-Economic Model of Small-Scale Farmers’ Land Use Decisions and Technology Choice in the Eastern Brazilian Amazon.” PhD Dissertation, Zentrum für Entwicklungsforschung. Bonn: ZEF. Boserup, E. 1965. The Conditions of Agricultural Growth: The Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure. New York: Aldine Press. ———. 1981. Population and Technology. Oxford: Blackwell. Bossio, D., K. Geheb, and W. Critchley. 2010. “Managing Water by Managing Land: Addressing Land Degradation to Improve Water Productivity and Rural Livelihoods.” Agricultural Water Management 97: 536–542. Bot, A., F. O. Nachtergaele, and A. Young. 2000. Land Resource Potential and Constraints at Regional and Country Levels. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome, Italy. 150
Boumans J. H., J. W. van Hoorn, G. P. Kruseman, and B. S. Tanwar. 1988. “Water Table Control, Reuse, and Disposal of Drainage Water in Haryana.” Agricultural Water Management 14 (1–4): 537–545. Boyd, C., and T. Slaymaker. 2000. “Re-examining the ‘More People, Less Erosion’ Hypothesis: Special Case or Wider Trend?” Natural Resource Perspective 63: 1–6. Boyd, J., and S. Banzhaf. 2007. “What Are Ecosystem Services? The Need for Standardized Environmental Accounting Units.” Ecological Economics 63: 616–626. Brasselle, F., A. Brasselle, F. Gaspart, and J.-P. Platteau. 2002. “Land Tenure Security and Investment Incentives: Puzzling Evidence from Burkina Faso.” Journal of Development Economics 67: 373–418. Bravo-Ureta, B. E., D. Solis, H. Cocchi, and R. E. Quiroga. 2006. “The Impact of Soil Conservation and Output Diversification on Farm Income in Central American Hillside Farming.” Agricultural Economics 35: 267– 276. Bruyninckx, H. 2004. “The Convention to Combat Desertification and the Role of Innovative Policy-Making Discourses: The Case of Burkina Faso.” Global Environmental Politics 4 (3): 107–127. Buenemann, M., C. Martius, J. Jones, S. Hermann, D. Klein, M. Mulligan, M. S. Reed, et al. (2011). “Integrative Geospatial Approaches for the Comprehensive Monitoring and Assessment of Land Management Sustainability: Rationale, Potentials, and Characteristics.” Land Degradation and Development, 22: 226– 239. Bunning, S., and D. Ndiaye. 2009. Case Studies on Measuring and Assessing Forest Degradation. A Local Level and Land Degradation Assessment Approach and a Case Study of Its Use in Senegal. Forest Resource Assessment Working Paper 174. Rome: FAO Forestry Department. Burt, O. 1981. “Farm-Level Economics of Soil-Conservation in the Palouse Area of the Northwest.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (1): 83–92. CACILM. 2006. Republic of Uzbekistan National Programming Framework. Prepared by Republic of Uzbekistan UNCCD National Working Group. Draft, 28 February 2006. www.adb.org/Projects/CACILM/documents.asp. Capoor, K., and F. Ambrosi. 2008. State and Trends of the Carbon Market 2008: A Focus on Africa. Washington, DC: World Bank. Castro Filho, C., T. A. Cochrane, L. D. Norton, J. H. Caviglione, and L. P. Johansson. (2001). “Land Degradation Assessment: Tools and Techniques for Measuring Sediment Load.” Third International Conference on Land Degradation and Meeting of the International Union of Soil Sciences, Subcommission C: Soil and Water Conservation, Rio de Janeiro, September 17–21. CBD (Convention on Biological Diversity). 2001. The Value of Forest Ecosystems. CBD Technical Series 4. Montreal. Chomitz, K. M. 1996. “Roads, Land Use, and Deforestation: A Spatial Model Applied to Belize.” The World Bank Economic Review. http://wber.oxfordjournals.org/content/10/3/487.abstract. Christensen, J. L., Hewitson,A. Busuioc,A. Chen, X. Gao, I. Held, R. Jones, K. Rupa Kumar. 2007. Regional Climate Projections. Climate Change 2007: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, K. Averyt, M. Marquis, K.B.M. Tignor and H.L.Miller, (Editors.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 847-940 CIESIN (Center for International Earth Science Information Network). 2010. Global Distribution of Poverty. Palisades, NY. http://sedac.ciesin.columbia.edu/povmap/ds_info.jsp. CIFOR (Center for International Forestry Research). 2008. CIFOR’s Strategy, 2008–2018: Making a Difference for Forests and People. Bogor, Indonesia. www.cifor.cgiar.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/CIFORStrategy0801.pdf. Clark, E.H., H.J. Haverkamp and W. Chapman. 1985. “Eroding Soils: The Off-Farm Impacts.” Washington DC: The Conservation Foundation. 151
Page 1 and 2:
IFPRI Discussion Paper 01086 May 20
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Abstract vii Acknowledgmen
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures 1.1—Conceptual fr
Page 7 and 8:
ABSTRACT Attention to land degradat
Page 9 and 10:
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADB Asia
Page 11:
SCAR Soil Conservation in Agricultu
Page 14 and 15:
In the present report, the conceptu
Page 16 and 17:
Framework: Confronting Action versu
Page 18 and 19:
understand these arrangements in or
Page 20 and 21:
Figure 1.3—Prevention, mitigation
Page 22 and 23:
on assessments at the micro level (
Page 24 and 25:
does not clearly distinguish betwee
Page 26 and 27:
Figure 2.1—GLASOD (1991) global a
Page 28 and 29:
International Earth Science Informa
Page 30 and 31:
Box 2.1—Continued Normalized Diff
Page 32 and 33:
Figure 2.4—Loss of annual NPP, GL
Page 34 and 35:
Figure 2.7—Annual loss of NPP in
Page 36 and 37:
Table 2.2—Nitrogen application ra
Page 38 and 39:
Figure 2.12—Areas affected by hum
Page 40 and 41:
output—which is a selection of su
Page 42 and 43:
GLADIS also underlines the linkage
Page 44 and 45:
Box 2.2—Continued A map on global
Page 46 and 47:
Table 2.3—Global land degradation
Page 48 and 49:
Table 2.3—Continued Project and d
Page 50 and 51:
Table 2.4—Continued Location 10 2
Page 52 and 53:
Table 2.6—Extent and severity of
Page 54 and 55:
National Level Policies As discusse
Page 56 and 57:
Such support has also been directed
Page 58 and 59:
Migration, either as outmigration o
Page 60 and 61:
The preceding discussion shows the
Page 62 and 63:
Results Correlation Analysis Consis
Page 64 and 65:
Figure 2.23—Relationship between
Page 66 and 67:
Effects of Land Degradation On-Site
Page 68 and 69:
soils and higher land productivity.
Page 70 and 71:
Acknowledging the work of GLADIS, a
Page 72 and 73:
health, education, security, enviro
Page 74 and 75:
Box 3.1—Recent major economic ass
Page 76 and 77:
An appropriate economic tool for a
Page 78 and 79:
Figure 3.4—Cost of action and cos
Page 80 and 81:
enefit—for example, income. This
Page 82 and 83:
Figure 3.6—Ecosystem services fra
Page 84 and 85:
Replacement Cost Approaches The rep
Page 86 and 87:
Box 3.2—Measuring land degradatio
Page 88 and 89:
land degradation and conservation m
Page 90 and 91:
Flooding and Aquifer Recharge Richa
Page 92 and 93:
year (Diao and Sarpong 2007). Sonne
Page 94 and 95:
Bringing together the different cos
Page 96 and 97:
This section discusses the most imp
Page 98 and 99:
governing land use patterns (Leeman
Page 100 and 101:
promotion of community forest manag
Page 102 and 103:
Box 4.3—Reducing emissions from d
Page 104 and 105:
Soil Nutrient Depletion Soil nutrie
Page 106 and 107:
that the yields of salt-tolerant wh
Page 108 and 109:
Figure 5.3—Forest area as a perce
Page 110 and 111:
Figure 5.5—Per capita water stora
Page 112 and 113: Introduction 6. CASE STUDIES Five c
Page 114 and 115: Salinity The effects of salinity on
Page 116 and 117: Third, to correctly decide which ac
Page 118 and 119: Costs of Action and Inaction We eva
Page 120 and 121: The NGOs and religious organization
Page 122 and 123: have a strong influence on NRM (And
Page 124 and 125: We estimated the cost of action (de
Page 126 and 127: Figure 6.15—Costs of action and i
Page 128 and 129: Of interest to us is the strategy t
Page 130 and 131: 7. PARTNERSHIP CONCEPT The review o
Page 132 and 133: degradation. All this should be don
Page 134 and 135: Finally, the global assessment of D
Page 136 and 137: the experience of and lessons learn
Page 138 and 139: Table 7.3—Example of E-DLDD resea
Page 140 and 141: 8. CONCLUSIONS Since the publicatio
Page 142 and 143: lowest in the region. From a socioe
Page 144 and 145: Table A.1—Land degradation assess
Page 146 and 147: Table A.2—Continued Author Region
Page 148 and 149: Table A.3—Continued Author Countr
Page 156 and 157: Table A.5—Costs of land degradati
Page 158 and 159: Figure B.1—Land use systems of th
Page 160 and 161: REFERENCES Abelson, P. 1979. Cost B
Page 164 and 165: Clark, E. H. 1985. The Off-Site Cos
Page 166 and 167: De Jager a., D. Onduru and C. Walag
Page 168 and 169: Foster, V., and C. Briceño-Garmend
Page 170 and 171: Holden, S. and H. Lofgren. 2005. As
Page 172 and 173: Lapar, M. L., and S. Pandey. 1999.
Page 174 and 175: Nachtergaele, F., M. Petri, R. Bian
Page 176 and 177: Pender, J. L. 2009. “Food Crisis
Page 178 and 179: Sauer, J., and H. Tchale. 2006. Alt
Page 180 and 181: Tan, Z. X., R. Lal, and K. D. Wiebe
Page 182 and 183: ———. 2010. “Assessment of L
Page 187 and 188: RECENT IFPRI DISCUSSION PAPERS For
show all

The Economics of Desertification, Land Degradation, and Drought

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?