14.02.2013 Views

Sustaining the World's Large Marine Ecosystems

Sustaining the World's Large Marine Ecosystems

Sustaining the World's Large Marine Ecosystems

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Exploration of <strong>the</strong> Sea, and <strong>the</strong> Helsinki Commission (HELCOM) (see Thulin, this<br />

volume).<br />

The Way Forward to Ecosystem-based Management<br />

In <strong>the</strong> 10-year timeline of annualized adaptive management actions depicted in<br />

Figure 28, <strong>the</strong> SAP provides <strong>the</strong> participating countries opportunity to continue<br />

<strong>the</strong> LME assessment and management practice as a self-financing activity<br />

supported with partnerships among stakeholders and engaged ministries vested<br />

with responsibility for marine resource development and sustainability.<br />

In <strong>the</strong> mid-1990s <strong>the</strong> scientific basis for moving toward ecosystem based<br />

assessment and management of marine goods and services was put forward by<br />

(Lubchenco 1994) and <strong>the</strong> Ecological Society of America (Christensen et al.<br />

1996). This movement represents a paradigm shift moving from single species<br />

assessments to multiple species assessments and <strong>the</strong> LME scale for measuring<br />

changing ecosystem states on an annual basis with a focus on not only<br />

ecosystem goods but also ecosystem services (Figure 29). More recent attention<br />

has been focused on <strong>the</strong> diminished services to humans of marine ecosystems<br />

and <strong>the</strong> concern that small changes in ecosystem resilience and robustness can<br />

lead to non-linear interactions, regime shifts, and collapses (Levin and<br />

Lubchenco 2008). Risks of ecosystem collapse are significantly diminished<br />

under resilient and robust ecosystem conditions wherein depleted fish<br />

populations can successfully be rebuilt (Worm et al. 2009). It is important to<br />

maintain close linkages among management activities framed to sustain<br />

socioeconomic ecosystem benefits. Monitoring and assessment methodology for<br />

measuring changing states using <strong>the</strong> 5-module suites of indicators: ecosystem<br />

productivity, fish and fisheries, pollution and ecosystem health (e.g. robustness<br />

and resilience) provide a scientific foundation for management policy that must<br />

also provide for socioeconomic benefits under a mutually agreeable governance<br />

regime.<br />

44<br />

FROM TO<br />

Individual species <strong>Ecosystems</strong><br />

Small spatial scale Multiple scales<br />

Short-term perspective Long-term perspective<br />

Humans: independent of ecosystems Humans: integral part of ecosystems<br />

Management divorced from research Adaptive management<br />

Managing commodities <strong>Sustaining</strong> production potential for<br />

goods and services<br />

Figure 29. A paradigm shift to ecosystem-based management. (from Lubchenco 1994). The<br />

scientific basis of ecosystem management. 103 rd Congress, 2d session, Committee Print. U.S.<br />

Government Printing Office.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!