Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng

Recommendations

Info

A-5 Appendix ii. Methodology The development of this preliminary Blueprint was a robust, comprehensive, and collaborative effort that involved Malaysians from all walks of life. It spanned two phases. The first phase was a comprehensive review and diagnostic of the education system to assess the current level of performance and identify a set of priority areas for improvement. This involved analysing national and international data as well as conducting state and school visits across the country. Several international and Malaysian organisations also contributed towards evaluating the Malaysian education system, including UNESCO, the World Bank, and six Malaysian universities. The second phase involved further exploration of issues on the ground, and the detailing of a comprehensive transformation programme to be undertaken from 2013 to 2025, with a particular focus on the first wave of transformation, to be undertaken from 2013 to 2015. To that end, a National Dialogue was held to identify the rakyat’s pressing concerns and gather their ideas for education transformation. The broad range and diversity of perspectives gathered from almost 12,000 members of the public and several key stakeholder groups was fundamental in shaping the development of this document. A series of labs were also held to develop initiatives for the first wave of the Blueprint (from 2013 to 2015) and to syndicate with relevant stakeholder groups. Throughout the two phases, a Malaysian and an International Review Panel also provided independent input and suggestion. governance structure The governance structure for this comprehensive undertaking was defined and established in October 2011. This structure was anchored around a Project Management Office (PMO) and Project Taskforce, which would be responsible for conducting the overall review of the education system, developing the new national education blueprint, and engaging a broad range of stakeholders throughout the process. Project management office To conduct the review of the Malaysian education system and develop the Blueprint, the Ministry established a dedicated PMO in October 2011 that reported directly to the Director-General. The PMO was responsible for conducting diagnostic analyses, integrating the results of the research produced by other entities (for example, UNESCO, World Bank, OECD, Malaysian universities), analysing and incorporating feedback from the National Dialogue, and developing a detailed transformation programme that incorporated and further built upon initiatives developed in the Education Labs. The PMO acted as the Secretariat for the overall review and development effort, and managed all internal and external engagement and interactions with stakeholders and key sources of input to the Blueprint (Exhibit II-1). Project taskforce The PMO reported weekly to a Project Taskforce, which in turn provided regular updates to the Minister of Education, Tan Sri Dato’ Haji Muhyiddin Haji Mohd. Yassin. The members of the taskforce are: ▪ Tan Sri Abd Ghafar Mahmud, Director-General of Education and Chairman of Taskforce ▪ Dato’ Dr. Rosli Mohamed, Secretary-General of the Ministry of Education ▪ Dato’ Wan Khazanah Ismail, Deputy Secretary-General (Management) ▪ Dato’ Nazirruddin Abd. Rahman, Deputy Secretary-General (Development) ▪ Dr. Amin Senin, Deputy Director-General (Policy and Education Development), and Head of PMO as of April 2012 ▪ Haji Sufa’at Tumin, Deputy Director-General (School Operations) ▪ Datuk Dr. Khair Mohamad Yusof, Deputy Director-General (Teacher Professional Development)
▪ Datuk Dr. Haili Dolhan, Rector, Teacher Education Institute of Malaysia ▪ Dr. Faridah Abu Hassan, Director, Educational Policy, Planning and Research Division ▪ Dr. Raslan Haniff Abdul Rashid, Special Officer to the Minister Education ▪ Dr. Noorliza Zakuan, Head of Delivery Management Office ▪ Tengku Azian Tengku Shahriman, Director of NKRA (Education) and NKEA (Education) The members of the PMO are: ▪ Puan Satinah Syed Saleh, Head of PMO (January-March 2012) ▪ Dr. Habibah Abdul Rahim ▪ Dr. Rosli Yacob ▪ Dr. Mohamed Yusoff Mohd. Nor ▪ Dr. Isham Ishak ▪ Norliah Abdul Aziz ▪ Dr. Hayati Ismail ▪ Dr. Rusmini Ku Ahmad ▪ Hj. Mustaffa Majid ▪ Fatin (Lim Siew Geck) Abdullah ▪ Noor Azman Mohd. Johan Exhibit ii-1 Governance structure for the Education System Review and Blueprint Development Local university reviews ▪ Focused review of eight selected areas UNESCO, World Bank ▪ Focused input on performance and selected issues in the education system Prime Minister of Malaysia Minister of Education ▪ Provide vision, scope and approve final blueprint Project Taskforce ▪ Overall responsibility for developing and delivering the education blueprint Ministry of Education PMO ▪ Conduct education review and prepare education blueprint ▪ Co-ordinate national dialogue and stakeholder engagement Provide input and guidance to the education review Malaysian Independent Review Panel International Independent Review Panel National Dialogue Panel report editing team Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 - 2025 Appendix II. Methodology During the final phase of preparing the preliminary blueprint, a larger team was convened by the Director-General to support the project taskforce in providing input towards the editing of the document. These additional team members were: ▪ Khalid Abu Bakar, Undersecretary, Competency Development and Evaluation Division ▪ Sabri Hj. Said, Undersecretary, Finance Division ▪ Khadijah Kassim, Undersecretary, Human Resource Development Division ▪ Dato’ Haji Khairil Awang, Director, Aminuddin Baki Institute ▪ Dr. Masnah Ali Muda, Director, Curriculum Development Division ▪ Dr. Naimah Ishak, Director, Examination Syndicate ▪ Ee Hong, Director, Sports Division ▪ Hj. Mohd. Subri Mat Isa, Director, Private Education Division ▪ Dr. Aliah Haji Ahmad Shah, Head, National Key Economic Area Unit ▪ Dr. Azian T.S. Abdullah, Deputy Director, Curriculum Development Division ▪ Dr. Zainal Aalam Hassan, Deputy Director, Educational Policy, Planning and Research Division ▪ Datin Nawal Hj Salleh, Deputy Director, Examination Syndicate ▪ Sazali Ahmad, Deputy Director, School Management Division ▪ Hj. Zainudin Abas, Deputy Director, Sports Division ▪ Rusnani Mohd. Sirin, Deputy Director, Special Education Division ▪ Zainurin Suparman, Deputy Director, Technical and Vocational Education Division ▪ Dr. Marzuki Mohamad, Special Officer to the Deputy Prime Minister ▪ Nor Zamani Abdol Hamid, Special Aide to the Director-General of Education ▪ Abrar Idris, Islamic Education Division ▪ Dr. Asmah Ahmad, Educational Policy, Planning and Research Division ▪ Ho Wooi Cheng, Curriculum Development Division ▪ Zamzaitul Akmal Hisham, Curriculum Development Division ▪ Ida Hairani Bakar, Curriculum Development Division ▪ B. Jagdeesh Kaur Gill, Curriculum Development Division A-6
Page 1:
Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 -
Page 5 and 6:
CHAPTER 1 CONTExT AND
Page 7 and 8:
TION Our education system has been
Page 9 and 10:
Delivering the shifts in achievemen
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 5 TEACHERS AND SCHOOL LEADE
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 4 CURRICUlUM AND ASSESSMENT
Page 19:
CHAPTER 8 SEQUENCINg THE TRANSfORMA
Page 22 and 23:
E-1 executive summary In October 20
Page 24 and 25:
E-3 significant and sustained inves
Page 26 and 27:
E-5 timss and Pisa international as
Page 28 and 29:
E-7 challenges remain in achieving
Page 30 and 31:
E-9 aspiratiOns fOr the malaysian e
Page 32 and 33:
E-11 shift 1: provide equal access
Page 34 and 35:
E-13 shift 3: develop values-driven
Page 36 and 37:
E-15 Eleven shifts to transform the
Page 38 and 39:
E-17 shift 5: ensure high-performin
Page 40 and 41:
E-19 shift 7: leverage ict to scale
Page 42 and 43:
E-21 shift 9: partner with parents,
Page 44 and 45:
E-23 What Impact Will This Transfor
Page 46 and 47:
E-25 EXHIBIT 9 the education transf
Page 48 and 49:
E-27 gains will be delivered within
Page 51 and 52:
CHAPTER 1 context and
Page 53 and 54:
Background to the Blueprint In 1957
Page 55 and 56:
in 2010 to 95% by the end of Year 2
Page 57 and 58:
▪ Fieldwork at both urban and rur
Page 59:
The Ministry acknowledges how impor
Page 62 and 63:
2-1 2. vision and aspirations Every
Page 64 and 65:
2-3 consistently demonstrated that
Page 66 and 67:
2-5 EXHIBIT 2-2 Time spent by stude
Page 68 and 69:
2-7 ▪ Emotional intelligence: pos
Page 71 and 72:
CHAPTER 3 current
Page 73 and 74:
EXHIBIT 3-1 Profile of the Malaysia
Page 75 and 76:
EXHIBIT 3-3 Educational attainment
Page 77 and 78:
EXHIBIT 3-5 Malaysian national exam
Page 79 and 80:
Malaysia’s performance in the 200
Page 81 and 82:
EXHIBIT 3-12 Comparison of Malaysia
Page 83 and 84:
EXHIBIT 3-15 Country performance in
Page 85 and 86:
Comparison of results between the T
Page 87 and 88:
administration of students’ welfa
Page 89 and 90:
EXHIBIT 3-23 Comparison of within-s
Page 91 and 92:
EXHIBIT 3-26 Examination results, d
Page 93 and 94:
EXHIBIT 3-28 Enrolment rates in dif
Page 95 and 96:
In general, there are signs of incr
Page 97 and 98:
Which countries Spend the most on e
Page 99:
As illustrated in this chapter, Mal
Page 102 and 103:
4-1 4. student learning All educati
Page 104 and 105:
4-3 the Written Curriculum The Mini
Page 106 and 107:
4-5 intensifying support systems fo
Page 108 and 109:
4-7 lANguAge The Ministry will aim
Page 110 and 111:
4-9 EXHIBIT 4-6 English and Bahasa
Page 112 and 113:
4-11 setting the stage for structur
Page 114 and 115:
4-13 the roadmap: Working with comm
Page 116 and 117:
4-15 Centres of Excellence for Indi
Page 118 and 119:
4-17 ▪ Special education schools:
Page 120 and 121:
4-19 special award schools The Mini
Page 122 and 123:
4-21 Johor’s Best Practices -- id
Page 124 and 125:
4-23
Page 127 and 128:
CHAPTER 5 Teachers and
Page 129 and 130:
TEACHERS The Ministry will ensure t
Page 131 and 132:
EXHIBIT 5-4 Breakdown of academic r
Page 133 and 134:
EXHIBIT 5-5 Breakdown of average st
Page 135 and 136:
ole) in 25 years. Nonetheless, this
Page 137 and 138:
e-Guru Video library The Ministry h
Page 139 and 140:
SCHOOl lEADERS The Ministry will en
Page 141 and 142:
Reviews indicate that these trainin
Page 143 and 144:
Establishing a principal residency
Page 145:
Page 148 and 149:
6-1 6. Ministry transformation The
Page 150 and 151:
6-3 EXHIBIT 6-1 selected examples o
Page 152 and 153:
6-5 LinUs case study on strong prog
Page 154 and 155:
6-7 ▪ Federal: The Head Office wi
Page 156 and 157:
6-9 The Ministry will also prioriti
Page 158 and 159:
6-11 The roadmap: maximising studen
Page 160 and 161:
6-13 incorporating outcome-based bu
Page 162 and 163:
6-15 EXHIBIT 6-11 identified gaps i
Page 164 and 165:
6-17 EXHIBIT 6-13 school infrastruc
Page 166 and 167:
6-19 single- and double-session sch
Page 168 and 169:
6-21 One reason usage still appears
Page 170 and 171:
6-23 discussed in Chapter 4, and wi
Page 172 and 173:
6-25
Page 175 and 176:
CHAPTER 7 SyStem
Page 177 and 178:
EXHIBIT 7-1 the Malaysian education
Page 179 and 180:
Preschool education Early Childhood
Page 181 and 182: EXHIBIT 7-3 Compulsory education po
Page 183 and 184: partners to improve the industry re
Page 185 and 186: In addition, there are approximatel
Page 187 and 188: enhancing the religious education p
Page 189 and 190: evaluating sports and arts schools
Page 191 and 192: current system structure to be main
Page 193 and 194: They will be provided with addition
Page 195 and 196: education can make a significant di
Page 197 and 198: launching an engagement toolkit for
Page 199 and 200: engaging the broader community Scho
Page 201: Malaysia Education Blueprint 2013 -
Page 204 and 205: 8-1 8. Delivering the roadmap The M
Page 206 and 207: 8-3 Sequencing the tranSformation T
Page 208 and 209: 8-5 EXHIBIT 8-3 the education trans
Page 210 and 211: 8-7 ▪ Enhanced practicum in vocat
Page 212 and 213: 8-9 Delivering Differently A well-c
Page 214 and 215: 8-11 getting StarteD The first year
Page 218 and 219: G-1 1BestariNet A project to equip
Page 220 and 221: G-3 IPTS Institut Pengajian Tinggi
Page 222 and 223: G-5 National dialogue engagement an
Page 224 and 225: G-7 SK Sekolah Kebangsaan or Nation
Page 228 and 229: A-1 Appendix i: A Brief History of
Page 230 and 231: A-3 educatIon develoPment durIng th
Page 234 and 235: A-7 analyses conducted By the Pmo T
Page 236 and 237: A-9 analyses conducted By PuBlIc un
Page 238 and 239: A-11 roundtable discussions These w
Page 240 and 241: A-13 Appendix iii: national dialogu
Page 242 and 243: A-15 Subtopic Example topic raised
Page 244 and 245: A-17 school quality Subtopic Exampl
Page 246 and 247: A-19 student learning Subtopic Exam
Page 248 and 249: A-21 Exhibit iV-1 the universal sca
Page 250 and 251: A-23 Exhibit V-2 PiSA PISA a A samp
Page 252 and 253: A-25 Exhibit V-4 PiSA PISA a sample
Page 258 and 259: A-31 Exhibit V-10 PiSA PISA a sampl
Page 260 and 261: A-33 Exhibit V-12 PiSA PISA a sampl
Page 262 and 263: A-35 the education transformation w
Page 264 and 265: A-37 Appendix Vii: GTp 2.0 educatio
show all

Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?