Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng
Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng
Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A-13<br />
Appendix iii: national dialogue Feedback<br />
Feedback from the rakyat via the National Dialogue was critical in the development of the<br />
<strong>Blueprint</strong>. The Ministry has carefully considered all concerns and suggestions received<br />
through the multiple sources. This appendix lists some of the frequent and consistent topics<br />
the rakyat raised and maps exactly how the Ministry commits to addressing them.<br />
The Ministry received a large sample of responses from a wide crosssection<br />
of society through the National Dialogue. In total, the Ministry<br />
received more than 7,000 responses across different channels.<br />
Responses came in from all relevant stakeholders including students,<br />
teachers, principals, parents, as well as special interest groups,<br />
politicians, and the private sector. The rakyat firmly believes in the<br />
urgent need for the education review. Of the more than 3,000 people<br />
surveyed at the townhalls, 42% believe the time is right for a review of<br />
our education system, while 56% believe a review is long overdue.<br />
sources of raKyat<br />
resPonses<br />
The 16 townhalls and three online channels reached out to the<br />
general public across all walks of life and from all parts of Malaysia.<br />
Close to 87% of the responses came from townhalls. Teachers and<br />
principals contributed 51% of responses, members of the public voiced<br />
28%, PIBG members provided 13%, NGOs expressed 7%, students and<br />
politicians collectively articulated 2% (Exhibit III-1). The responses<br />
came from a mix of ethnicities, with the Bumiputera community<br />
comprising 73% , the Chinese community providing 14%, and the<br />
Indian community contributing 12% of responses (Exhibit III-1), while<br />
the remaining 1% came from other communities. The profile of the<br />
respondents was comparable to the profile of the attendees (refer to<br />
Appendix II for details on attendee profile).<br />
Exhibit iii-1<br />
Townhall response profile<br />
Occupational profile of those who<br />
provided responses<br />
PIBG 15<br />
General<br />
members<br />
of public<br />
NGOs Others1<br />
2<br />
9<br />
23<br />
51<br />
Teachers<br />
and<br />
principals<br />
Ethnic profile of those who<br />
provided responses<br />
Indian Others<br />
12<br />
1<br />
Chinese<br />
14<br />
73<br />
Malay and<br />
Bumiputera<br />
1 Other occupational profiles refer to students (1% of total respondents) and politicians (1% of total respondents)<br />
SOURCE: Project Management Office, Ministry of Education<br />
The 20 roundtables engaged in greater detail with specific<br />
stakeholder and interest groups (refer to Appendix II for details<br />
on which groups were engaged with), and these sessions provided<br />
more nuanced perspectives from these stakeholders. Direct feedback<br />
from students themselves was also gathered through school visits<br />
and workshops in Johor. Finally, the submission of memoranda by<br />
individuals, organisations, and institutions provided the Ministry<br />
with solid, detailed written perspectives and recommendations from<br />
important stakeholders and subject matter experts. This feedback was<br />
highly informative and critical in the development of the <strong>Blueprint</strong>.<br />
maP of natIonal dIalogue<br />
feedBacK to mInIstry<br />
commItments<br />
The National Dialogue provided an opportunity for the rakyat to voice<br />
their opinions, provide constructive criticism, and suggest solutions to<br />
the issues facing the Malaysian education system. The feedback can be<br />
broadly grouped into four categories:<br />
▪ Aspirations: Many of the aspirations raised were in line with<br />
existing policies, but the level of interest in this area suggests<br />
that more needs to be done to address them. The most recurring<br />
feedback was for the Ministry to focus on improving quality,<br />
equity, and unity in the near-term. Promisingly, close to 73% of the<br />
approximately 3,000 people answering the exit surveys believed<br />
that the Malaysian education system can achieve international<br />
standards in the future;<br />
▪ Teachers: Participants from all walks of life consistently and<br />
frequently discussed the need to raise the quality of teachers,<br />
particularly in terms of teacher support and performance<br />
management. While the topic was most frequently explored by<br />
teachers themselves, this matter was also raised by principals,<br />
students, and parents alike;<br />
▪ School quality: There was also extensive feedback on how to<br />
improve school quality. Most of the feedback was on ensuring that<br />
schools would provide a learning environment that would be more<br />
conducive for teaching and learning; and<br />
▪ Student learning: Respondents articulated a desire for a<br />
more relevant curriculum, and better language proficiency and<br />
communication abilities for our students, to lay the foundations for<br />
students’ success in the 21 st century.<br />
The Ministry is committed to taking action on the feedback it has<br />
received. The tables that follow provide a clear mapping of that<br />
commitment. They illustrate some of the specific comments and<br />
suggestions raised, and provide a brief explanation of how the Ministry<br />
will address these issues. A deeper understanding of the context and<br />
specifics of the initiatives can be found by referring to the chapters<br />
listed in this <strong>Blueprint</strong>.