18.02.2013 Views

Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng

Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng

Preliminary-Blueprint-Eng

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A-13<br />

Appendix iii: national dialogue Feedback<br />

Feedback from the rakyat via the National Dialogue was critical in the development of the<br />

<strong>Blueprint</strong>. The Ministry has carefully considered all concerns and suggestions received<br />

through the multiple sources. This appendix lists some of the frequent and consistent topics<br />

the rakyat raised and maps exactly how the Ministry commits to addressing them.<br />

The Ministry received a large sample of responses from a wide crosssection<br />

of society through the National Dialogue. In total, the Ministry<br />

received more than 7,000 responses across different channels.<br />

Responses came in from all relevant stakeholders including students,<br />

teachers, principals, parents, as well as special interest groups,<br />

politicians, and the private sector. The rakyat firmly believes in the<br />

urgent need for the education review. Of the more than 3,000 people<br />

surveyed at the townhalls, 42% believe the time is right for a review of<br />

our education system, while 56% believe a review is long overdue.<br />

sources of raKyat<br />

resPonses<br />

The 16 townhalls and three online channels reached out to the<br />

general public across all walks of life and from all parts of Malaysia.<br />

Close to 87% of the responses came from townhalls. Teachers and<br />

principals contributed 51% of responses, members of the public voiced<br />

28%, PIBG members provided 13%, NGOs expressed 7%, students and<br />

politicians collectively articulated 2% (Exhibit III-1). The responses<br />

came from a mix of ethnicities, with the Bumiputera community<br />

comprising 73% , the Chinese community providing 14%, and the<br />

Indian community contributing 12% of responses (Exhibit III-1), while<br />

the remaining 1% came from other communities. The profile of the<br />

respondents was comparable to the profile of the attendees (refer to<br />

Appendix II for details on attendee profile).<br />

Exhibit iii-1<br />

Townhall response profile<br />

Occupational profile of those who<br />

provided responses<br />

PIBG 15<br />

General<br />

members<br />

of public<br />

NGOs Others1<br />

2<br />

9<br />

23<br />

51<br />

Teachers<br />

and<br />

principals<br />

Ethnic profile of those who<br />

provided responses<br />

Indian Others<br />

12<br />

1<br />

Chinese<br />

14<br />

73<br />

Malay and<br />

Bumiputera<br />

1 Other occupational profiles refer to students (1% of total respondents) and politicians (1% of total respondents)<br />

SOURCE: Project Management Office, Ministry of Education<br />

The 20 roundtables engaged in greater detail with specific<br />

stakeholder and interest groups (refer to Appendix II for details<br />

on which groups were engaged with), and these sessions provided<br />

more nuanced perspectives from these stakeholders. Direct feedback<br />

from students themselves was also gathered through school visits<br />

and workshops in Johor. Finally, the submission of memoranda by<br />

individuals, organisations, and institutions provided the Ministry<br />

with solid, detailed written perspectives and recommendations from<br />

important stakeholders and subject matter experts. This feedback was<br />

highly informative and critical in the development of the <strong>Blueprint</strong>.<br />

maP of natIonal dIalogue<br />

feedBacK to mInIstry<br />

commItments<br />

The National Dialogue provided an opportunity for the rakyat to voice<br />

their opinions, provide constructive criticism, and suggest solutions to<br />

the issues facing the Malaysian education system. The feedback can be<br />

broadly grouped into four categories:<br />

▪ Aspirations: Many of the aspirations raised were in line with<br />

existing policies, but the level of interest in this area suggests<br />

that more needs to be done to address them. The most recurring<br />

feedback was for the Ministry to focus on improving quality,<br />

equity, and unity in the near-term. Promisingly, close to 73% of the<br />

approximately 3,000 people answering the exit surveys believed<br />

that the Malaysian education system can achieve international<br />

standards in the future;<br />

▪ Teachers: Participants from all walks of life consistently and<br />

frequently discussed the need to raise the quality of teachers,<br />

particularly in terms of teacher support and performance<br />

management. While the topic was most frequently explored by<br />

teachers themselves, this matter was also raised by principals,<br />

students, and parents alike;<br />

▪ School quality: There was also extensive feedback on how to<br />

improve school quality. Most of the feedback was on ensuring that<br />

schools would provide a learning environment that would be more<br />

conducive for teaching and learning; and<br />

▪ Student learning: Respondents articulated a desire for a<br />

more relevant curriculum, and better language proficiency and<br />

communication abilities for our students, to lay the foundations for<br />

students’ success in the 21 st century.<br />

The Ministry is committed to taking action on the feedback it has<br />

received. The tables that follow provide a clear mapping of that<br />

commitment. They illustrate some of the specific comments and<br />

suggestions raised, and provide a brief explanation of how the Ministry<br />

will address these issues. A deeper understanding of the context and<br />

specifics of the initiatives can be found by referring to the chapters<br />

listed in this <strong>Blueprint</strong>.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!