Bringing the Empire Back In52 3. Defining Empires and StatesIf it is well <strong>de</strong>fined, the notion of ‘empire’ can account, in fact, for more than two-dozencases of ancient, medieval, mo<strong>de</strong>rn and current experiences of human government. Theyinclu<strong>de</strong> the above mentioned ancient Chinese and Persian empires, the classical Romanempire, the colonial empires of Spain, Britain and France, the mo<strong>de</strong>rn Russia, and also thepresent configurations of the United States of America and of the European Union.The ‘state’, in turn, is a form of government that has achieved wi<strong>de</strong> appeal in the mo<strong>de</strong>rnworld. Apparently, the current world is organized in almost 200 ‘states’. But only a relativelylimited number of these political units can be consi<strong>de</strong>red to be successful ‘states’ in a strictsense of the word. Sovereign states succee<strong>de</strong>d in Europe within a historical period that beganabout 300 years ago and is today essentially finished.Actually, the first mo<strong>de</strong>rn states emerged from and consolidated themselves against previouslyexisting empires. The earliest political units <strong>de</strong>serving to be called states were England,France, Spain and Swe<strong>de</strong>n, which were formed on territories located at the peripheryof the former Western Roman empire. During the 18th century all of these states combinedoccupied only between 2 or 3 percent of the earth’s territory, while all other parts of theworld were organized in small political units and larger empires of various formulas. Newlarge states were also formed later in the core territory of the Roman empire, Germany andItaly, but in these cases in a much more <strong>de</strong>centralized way based on the aggregation of anetworks of mid-size cities and regions.The essential characteristics of ‘empires’ are in contrast with those of ‘states’.On the basis of the above discussion, we can <strong>de</strong>fine ‘empire’ with the following elements:- Very large size, in terms of both territory and population.- Absence of fixed or permanent boundaries. Empires tend to expand over theterritory, up to the point of conflict with other empires, and when in <strong>de</strong>cline they may alsocontract. In general, ‘territory’ should not be consi<strong>de</strong>red a strong <strong>de</strong>fining element of empire.- A compound of diverse groups and territorial units. In ancient and medieval times,an empire could be comprised of cities, republics, counties, principalities, bishoprics andother varied forms of political organization. Today, multi-ethnic fe<strong>de</strong>rations can be arrangedwith less heterogeneous institutional regimes. But <strong>de</strong>mocratic empires may also inclu<strong>de</strong>political units organized with different forms of parliamentary or presi<strong>de</strong>ntial, unichamber ormulti-chamber, monarchical or republican governments. They may be linked to the centerby diverse institutional formulas.- A set of multilevel, often overlapping jurisdictions. Within an empire, no authoritytypically rules with exclusive powers. Rather, the central government may rule indirectlythrough local governments; the latter <strong>de</strong>velop self-government on important issues; powersharing is wi<strong>de</strong>spread.<strong>GCG</strong> GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSIA <strong>2008</strong> VOL. 2 NUM. 1 ISSN: 1988-7116
Josep M. ColomerIn contrast, ‘state’ can be <strong>de</strong>fined for the following characteristics:53- Large or mid size, in terms of both territory and population.- Fixed territory and formal boundaries. The clear establishment and foreign recognitionof the territorial limits of a state are inten<strong>de</strong>d as protection from external attacks, invasions,immigrants and imports.- Sovereignty. The state has supreme authority over a territory and population. Itrecognizes no other source of jurisdiction but itself. The state’s power to make ultimate <strong>de</strong>cisionsis recognized by other sovereign states.- Monopoly and homogenization. The state has reserved functions with exclusive jurisdictionwithin its territory. Whether dictatorial or <strong>de</strong>mocratic, it is organized with an internalhierarchy of powers. In or<strong>de</strong>r to facilitate the exercise of its functions and consummate itsexclusiveness, it tends to establish a uniform administration over the territory, as well as topromote the homogenization of important social and cultural characteristics of its subjectsor citizens.4. The Evolution of EmpiresChanges in the size and other <strong>de</strong>fining characteristics of political units, that is, the prevalenceof either vast empires or large states or smaller communities in different historical periodscan <strong>de</strong>rive from two factors. First, they are fostered by technological changes, especiallyregarding war, transports and communication. Second, institutional changes are producedby human <strong>de</strong>cisions favoring security, freedom and well-being, such as can be provi<strong>de</strong>d bymo<strong>de</strong>rn electoral <strong>de</strong>mocracies.In the long term there has been an ever-continuing historical trend toward larger empires.The size and evolution of empires have been studied in four illuminating articles by Rein Taagepera(1978a, 1978b, 1979, 1997), which are largely based on data in Colin McEvedy andRichard Jones (1978). According to these data, there is no evi<strong>de</strong>nce of empires larger than10,000 km2 much before 3000 BC. The largest ancient empires, in Egypt and Mesopotamia,with about one million km2, were still tiny compared to the present ones. The largest ones atthe beginning of our era, in China and Rome, were already much larger, with about five millionkm2. But mo<strong>de</strong>rn empires, including Russia and the colonial empires of Spain and Britain,have encompassed double-digit millions of km2.This continuing trend toward larger sizes of empires has been enabled, in<strong>de</strong>ed, by technologicaladvances in transports and communications. Roads, canals, harbors, railways andhighways have always formed the skeleton of empires. But things changed dramaticallywith the invention of the telegraphy in the 19th century, later followed by the telephony andthe internet, which created the age of instant communication. The art of government at adistance has multiplied the size of viable empires.Another historical trend is towards an increasing number of simultaneous empires, so that<strong>GCG</strong> GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - UNIVERSIA <strong>2008</strong> VOL. 2 NUM. 1 ISSN: 1988-7116
- Page 1 and 2: Revista cuatrimestral Four-monthly
- Page 3 and 4: En el segundo artículo, Andrés Op
- Page 6 and 7: SUMARIO SUMMARY SUMÁRIO1ÚAmérica
- Page 8 and 9: StaffUniversity, EEUUEdwards, Sebas
- Page 10: StaffMario Cimoli, Technology and i
- Page 13 and 14: Libros: Dornier, P.P.; Ertns, R.; F
- Page 15 and 16: GCG- Each article will be submitted
- Page 17 and 18: GCGGCG GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY - UNIV
- Page 19 and 20: 1. América Latina: la coyuntura ac
- Page 21 and 22: Bernardo Kosacoff y Andrés LopezAc
- Page 23 and 24: Bernardo Kosacoff y Andrés Lopezso
- Page 25 and 26: Bernardo Kosacoff y Andrés Lopez3.
- Page 27 and 28: Bernardo Kosacoff y Andrés Lopezva
- Page 29 and 30: Bernardo Kosacoff y Andrés Lopezaf
- Page 31 and 32: Bernardo Kosacoff y Andrés LopezBi
- Page 33 and 34: Bernardo Kosacoff y Andrés Lopez33
- Page 35 and 36: United States and Europe have becom
- Page 37 and 38: Andres Oppenheimer2,800, Chile 1570
- Page 39 and 40: Andres Oppenheimer39GCG GEORGETOWN
- Page 41 and 42: experiments we quantified the destr
- Page 43 and 44: Hilda Ochoa-Brillembourgallow more
- Page 45 and 46: Hilda Ochoa-Brillembourg1.3. Help C
- Page 47 and 48: Hilda Ochoa-Brillembourg2. Why the
- Page 49 and 50: with a number of empires in other h
- Page 51: Josep M. Colomertial violence, forc
- Page 55 and 56: Josep M. Colomeroverlapping institu
- Page 57 and 58: Josep M. ColomerReferences57Badie,
- Page 59 and 60: Josep M. Colomer59GCG GEORGETOWN UN
- Page 61 and 62: países con regimenes democráticos
- Page 63 and 64: Beatriz M. Ramacciottiel ámbito mu
- Page 65 and 66: Beatriz M. Ramacciottimiembro de lo
- Page 67 and 68: Beatriz M. RamacciottiEl nuevo esce
- Page 69 and 70: Beatriz M. RamacciottiComo dicen al
- Page 71 and 72: Beatriz M. Ramacciottiobservaciones
- Page 73 and 74: Beatriz M. Ramacciotti73GCG GEORGET
- Page 75 and 76: del entorno global (Prats i Catalá
- Page 77 and 78: Manuel F. Suarez-Barraza y Juan Ram
- Page 79 and 80: Manuel F. Suarez-Barraza y Juan Ram
- Page 81 and 82: Manuel F. Suarez-Barraza y Juan Ram
- Page 83 and 84: Manuel F. Suarez-Barraza y Juan Ram
- Page 85 and 86: Manuel F. Suarez-Barraza y Juan Ram
- Page 87 and 88: Manuel F. Suarez-Barraza y Juan Ram
- Page 89 and 90: de los países del mundo, utilizan
- Page 91 and 92: Daniel Correa SabatPor su parte, y
- Page 93 and 94: Daniel Correa SabatPara efectos de
- Page 95 and 96: Daniel Correa Sabaten la contrataci
- Page 97 and 98: Daniel Correa Sabaten definitiva, g
- Page 99 and 100: Daniel Correa SabatReferencias99ANG
- Page 101 and 102: filantropía a nivel local, son tod
- Page 103 and 104:
Francesco D. Sandulli3. Estrategias
- Page 105 and 106:
Francesco D. SandulliTabla 1: Medic
- Page 107 and 108:
Francesco D. SandulliTal y como se
- Page 109 and 110:
Francesco D. SandulliEn el segundo
- Page 111:
Francesco D. SandulliBibliografía1