Masterscriptie - NIP

More documents

Recommendations

Info

P-E MISFIT EN INNOVATIEF WERKGEDRAG BIJ STUDENTEN. 56 dimensions, time perspectives, and mechanisms. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 31, 248-267. Carmeli, A., & Vinarski-Peretz, H. (2011). Linking Care Felt to Engagement in Innovative Behaviors in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Conditions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5, 43-53. Chatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459-484. Chatman, J.,Caldwell, D. F, & O’Reilly, C. A., (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 487–516. Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2006). Creativity versus conscientiousness: Which is a better predictor of student performance Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 521– 531. Chess, S., & Thomas, A., (1977). Temperament and development. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Choi, N. J. (2004). Person- Environment Fit and Creative Behavior: Differential Impacts of Supplies-Values and Demands-Abilities Versions of Fit. Human Relation, 57, 531. Choi, J., & Price, R. (2005). The effects of person-innovation fit on individual responses to innovation. Journal of occupational and organizational psychology, 78, 83-96. Church, M.A., Elliot, A.J., & Sheldon, K.M. (1997). Avoidance personal goals and subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,23, 915-927. Clarck, R.M. (2005). Negotiating the Freshman Year: Challenges and Strategies Among First-Year Collegge Students. Journal of College Student Development, 46, 297-316. Colquitt, J.A., Porter, C.O.L.H., Noe, R.A., & Simmering, M.J. (2003). Conscientiousness, Autonomy Fit, and Development: A Longitudinal Study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 954-963. Compeau, D. R., & Higgins, C. A. (1995). Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19, 189-211. Cornelis, I., Roets, A., Soetens, B., & Van Hiel, A. (2008). Determinants of Task
P-E MISFIT EN INNOVATIEF WERKGEDRAG BIJ STUDENTEN. 57 Performance and Invested Effort: A Need for Closure by Relative Cognitive Capacity Interaction Analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulleting, 34, 779. Conyne, R. K. (1978). An analysis of student-environment mismatches. Journal of College Student Personnel, 19, 461–465. Crant, J.M. (2000). Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management, 26, 535-462. Cron, W.L., Slocum, J.W., & Vande Walle,D. (2001). The Role of Goal Orientation Following Performance Feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 629- 640. Da Silva, N., Davis, A.R. (2011). Absorptive Capacity at the Individual Level: Linking Creativity to Innovation in Academia. Review of Higher Education, 34, 355- 379. Dawis, R. V., & Lofquist, L. H. (1976). Personality Style and the Process of Work Adjustment. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 23, 55-59. Dawis, R.V., & Lofquist, L.H. (1993). From TWA to PEC. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 43, 113-121. Deci, E. L, & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227– 268. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., Gagne´ M., Leone, D. R., Usunov, J., & Kornazheva, B. P. (2001). Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former Eastern bloc country: A crosscultural study of self-determination. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 930–942. De Grada, E., Kruglanski, A.W., Livi, S., Mannetti, L., & Pierro, A. (2003). Autocracy bias in informal groups under need for closure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 405-417. Devloo, T. (2008). Hoe gaan personen om met ‘person-job’ misfit Een veldonderzoek naar proactieve hanteringsstrategieën. (Scripie). Universiteit Gent. Diener, C. I., & Dweck, C. S. (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451–462.
Page 1 and 2:
UNIVERSITEIT GENT Faculteit Psychol
Page 3 and 4:
P-E MISFIT EN INNOVATIEF WERKGEDRAG
Page 5 and 6:
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12: P-E MISFIT EN INNOVATIEF WERKGEDRAG
Page 61: P-E MISFIT EN INNOVATIEF WERKGEDRAG
Page 71: P-E MISFIT EN INNOVATIEF WERKGEDRAG
show all

Masterscriptie - NIP

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?