Udvælgelses- dan og tildelingskriter ske byggesektor ... - RenProces

More documents

Recommendations

Info

In the Danish system the public building projects are inspected and the clients and contractors have to inform The Benchmark Centre for the Danish Construction Sector about topics as: cooperating, quality of the project, project delays or in time and why, is the estimated price realised if not why etc. (Byggeriets Evaluerings Center 2, 2008). After a number of projects the parties, contractors and technical advisers, have a mark book containing the company’s key performance indicators. Now, the clients in the building sector can use the key performance indicators as selection and assignment criteria. Indicators telling about communication, personal qualifications, technical qualifications, team qualifications, references etc can be used and now these criteria are suddenly much more measurable and unambiguous. Using the key performance indicators as selection and assignment criteria makes these new criteria more measurable and unambiguous, and therefore hopefully less cases end up in The Danish Board of Complaints on Tendering. References Byggeriets Evaluerings Center 1. (2008) (The Benchmark Centre for the Danish Construction Sector ) WWW.byggeevaluering.dk Nøgletal(Key Performance Indicators) Byggeriets Evaluerings Center 2. (2008) (The Benchmark Centre for the Danish Construction Sector) www.byggeevaluering.dk/db/files/bec_uk_2006.pdf Benchmarking Danish Construction Dansk Byggeri. (2008) (The Danish Construction Association) WWW. <strong>dan</strong>skbyggeri.dk Noegletal Konjunkturanalyse Jan.08(Analysis on state of market included key figures) Ebbesen, R. M. and Ussing, L. F. ( 2007) Tendering for Personal Competencies – a way of improvement? Postgraduate Researchers of the Built & Natural Environment, Glasgow, PRoBE07 Fabricius J. and Offersen, R. (2006) EU’s udbudsregler I praksis.(EU Bidding Rules in Practice) Forlaget Thomson A/S, Copenhagen Klagenaevnet for udbud. (2008) (The Danish Board of Complaints on Tendering) WWW.klfu.dk Emneregister(Topic Record) Konkurrencestyrelsen. (2008) (The Danish Competition Authority) WWW.ks.dk Ligebehandlingsprincippet (Equality of treatment principle) Nielsen R. and Treumer, S. (2005) The New EU Public Procurement Directives. Djoef. Publishing, Copenhagen. 220
Plus netvaerk. (2008) (Partnering, learning, development and cooperation network) WWW.plus-net.dk Partnering <strong>og</strong> tvister i byggeriet.(Partnering and dispute in the Danish Building Sector) PLUS 6Maj 2008 Siemiatycki M. (2007) Handling Optimism Biases in the Delivery of Large-Infrastructure. Project: A Corporate Performance Benchmarking Approach. University of Glasgow Tendering Act 1/9 2001, last revision 6/6 2007 Ussing, L.F. (2008) How does the ideal building team look? BuHu 8th International Postgraduate Research Conference 2008 221
Page 1 and 2:
Udvælgelses- og tildelingskriter r
Page 4:
Forord Denneph.d.afhandlingerdokume
Page 7 and 8:
Nøgleord:Udvælgelsesogtildelingsk
Page 9 and 10:
Theguidanceisplannedcontemplatedtob
Page 11 and 12:
Bilag 1. AftalemedBoligfondenKuben1
Page 13 and 14:
Kapitel1 Baggrund Endagi2005blevder
Page 15 and 16:
Fig.1.1Sammenligningafhåndværkeru
Page 17 and 18:
inuværendeprojekter,atteametersamm
Page 19 and 20:
Kapitel 2 Historik
Page 21 and 22:
Dissebehovresulteredei,atbetoneleme
Page 23 and 24:
Fig.2.3Gennemsnitligårligvækstiti
Page 25 and 26:
1993),hvilketefterfølgendeidendans
Page 27 and 28:
30
Page 29 and 30:
Kapitel3 Metodevalgogforskningsspø
Page 31 and 32:
Eteksempelpåenteoriindenfordenhypo
Page 33 and 34:
projekteridagsåhurtigt,atderikkeer
Page 35 and 36:
Selvedetvidenskabeligearbejdebestå
Page 37 and 38:
Ved de personlige samtaler er der s
Page 39 and 40:
Fem offentliggjorte artikler er en
Page 41 and 42:
Kapitel 4 Teori
Page 43 and 44:
Kapitel4.1 Teori-Management Iforbin
Page 45 and 46:
Opfølgningogevalueringafdevalgtem
Page 47 and 48:
Vælgesensamtalemedenefterfølgende
Page 49 and 50:
nefratesten,erderengodsandsynlighed
Page 51 and 52:
Fig.4.1.2Model:Fraindividtilhøjtyd
Page 53 and 54:
4.1.3Teamledelse-beslutningsmodelle
Page 55 and 56:
EllervedHerseyogBlanchardsfigur4.1.
Page 57 and 58:
Bliverenbeslutningpolitiskelleranar
Page 59 and 60:
4.1.5Partneringlangvarigesamarbejds
Page 61 and 62:
skereroprettet.Derforkandetværeenf
Page 63 and 64:
Kapitel 4.2 Jura
Page 65 and 66:
Vedetoffentligttilskudellerenoffent
Page 67 and 68:
74 FIDIC Somovenforvisteskema
Page 69 and 70:
Tærskelværdierne: Tærskelværd
Page 71 and 72:
Lovbekendtgørelsenr.336af13/51997(
Page 73 and 74:
80
Page 75 and 76:
Kapitel5 Offentliggjorteartikler So
Page 77 and 78:
5.5HowcanRequestedCooperationSkills
Page 79 and 80:
Kapitel 6 Analyse: Hvad karakterise
Page 81 and 82:
etbyggeteamkansammensættes,sådetf
Page 83 and 84:
6.2Inputframanagementteori Efterint
Page 85 and 86:
aum og Schmidts lederadfærd og Her
Page 87 and 88:
vereogendnuflereentreprenører.Tili
Page 89 and 90:
Intervieweneirunde2ersomførnævntu
Page 91 and 92:
12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1heltenig 2næstenh
Page 93 and 94:
Fig.6.4Vægtningaftildelingskriteri
Page 95 and 96:
summendervedrøreretbyggeriogtillig
Page 97 and 98:
Kapitel7 Analyse:Hvordanvælgesdetm
Page 99 and 100:
personligeegenskabersomtildelingskr
Page 101 and 102:
Fig.7.3Antaltilbagetrukneklagesager
Page 103 and 104:
tale om en forsyningsvirksomhed, er
Page 105 and 106:
Kapitel 8 Konklusion - Forslag l v
Page 107 and 108:
gavenisamarbejdemeddeøvrigebydende
Page 109 and 110:
delbarterdetvigtige,atden”rigtige
Page 111 and 112:
122
Page 113 and 114:
Referencer Adizes,I.(1979)Lederensf
Page 115 and 116:
Erhvervsogbyggestyrelsen(2010) Omfa
Page 117 and 118:
PLUS(2008)Partneringogtvisteribygge
Page 119 and 120:
Bilag
Page 121 and 122:
20. marts 2006 Projektbeskrivelse t
Page 123 and 124:
forbedre processens ”ydre” og
Page 125 and 126:
3 Projektbudget 3.1 Samlet budget f
Page 127 and 128:
Bilag 2 Summering af interview
Page 129 and 130:
Bygherren: Der er ønske om at væl
Page 131 and 132:
9. Kan der nævnes en sag, hvor pro
Page 133 and 134:
Entreprenøren: Den bedst egnede ti
Page 135 and 136:
2.2.2Spørgsmåltilvirksomhederne U
Page 137 and 138:
Spørgsmålenetilcasenbedesbesvaret
Page 139 and 140:
UdbudafMultiCenteriSkelund/Veddum H
Page 141 and 142:
NøgletalfraByggerietsEvalueringsce
Page 143 and 144:
158
Page 145 and 146:
Brugesallerede,etgodtsamarbejdeoggo
Page 147 and 148:
Hvorfor? Bygherrer Testkanhavenegat
Page 149 and 150:
3. Bygherrenbørstillekravomatgodke
Page 151 and 152:
4. Hvisderskalværedetmesteffektive
Page 153 and 154: Rådgivere:Tildelingskriterierneerv
Page 155 and 156: 5. MenerI,atdereretellerflerekriter
Page 157 and 158: Entreprenører Totaløkonomi Drift
Page 159 and 160: Hvilkefordele/risicivilderværeveda
Page 161 and 162: Risici:Sværtatklageogskifteenperso
Page 163 and 164: Anlægspris Totaløkonomisetibygnin
Page 165 and 166: 180
Page 167 and 168: PAPER NUMBER A Diverse Understandin
Page 169 and 170: A Diverse Understanding of Value in
Page 179 and 180: TENDERING FOR PERSONAL COMPETENCIES
Page 181 and 182: 2006). As a part of the case study,
Page 183 and 184: 4. IN THE IDEAL WORLD I WOULD WORK
Page 185 and 186: in-depth research and perhaps even
Page 187 and 188: Ebbesen, R. M., and Olsen, W., 2006
Page 189 and 190: How does the ideal building team lo
Page 191 and 192: groups and matrix organisations are
Page 193 and 194: includes that all parties earn mone
Page 195 and 196: The figure and the persons mentione
Page 197 and 198: Many Cases in the Danish Building S
Page 199 and 200: 3. Discussion 3.1 What decisions ca
Page 201 and 202: Fig. 2. All decisions from The Dani
Page 203: If the number of cases is too high
Page 207 and 208: How can Requested Cooperation Skill
Page 209 and 210: Finally, a conclusion is presented,
Page 211 and 212: How will the company ensure a good
Page 213 and 214: A national, regional or local autho
Page 215 and 216: 4. Conclusions The case about the d
Page 217 and 218: not need too. If this option has to
Page 219 and 220: Bilag 4 Undersøgelser og casestudi
Page 221 and 222: Resultatetafoptællingenfordeltpåd
Page 223 and 224: Fig.B1.AntalkendelserfraKlagenævne
Page 225 and 226: Nårtalleneerkorrigeret,erderstadig
Page 227 and 228: SagmellemDanskeArkitektvirksomheder
Page 229 and 230: Påstandertagettilfølge. Påstand
Page 231 and 232: atdetikkeernokathavekendskabtiludbu
Page 233 and 234: SagmellemFunderÅdalkonsortietogVej
Page 235 and 236: selvstændigt delkriterium under et
Page 237 and 238: Vigtigetingtillæring Som ved den f
Page 239 and 240: 6.maj2008indklager Påstande
Page 241 and 242: dissevaruegnedetilatidentificeredet
Page 243 and 244: Påstand 3. Samme begrundelser fra
Page 245 and 246: enhedspriser, som kunne være den,
Page 247 and 248: 264
Page 249 and 250: Udbudsforløbicasen Sagenerstartetm
Page 251 and 252: leområder,sombestyrelsenønskedebe
Page 253 and 254: Kriterierneforatkommepålistenvar:
Page 255 and 256:
Erdirektiverneoverholdt? Faktumer,a
Page 257 and 258:
Maskindelen-hvordankanreglerneoverh
Page 259 and 260:
etindividtilandre,ogdesbedreetikogm
Page 261 and 262:
Etafnøgletalleneidagerkundetilfred
Page 263 and 264:
olle.Debydendeharsåledesikkeværet
Page 265 and 266:
Repræsenterebygherrenpåopgaven U
Page 267 and 268:
Udgangspunktetvar,atMariagerfjordSp
Page 269 and 270:
Samtalerneblevafholdtudfraenensarte
Page 271 and 272:
Bygherrenogdenvalgterådgivervartil
Page 273 and 274:
ErEUdirektivetoverholdt? Somdettidl
Page 275 and 276:
292
Page 277 and 278:
Oplægtil: VejledningAnbefalingerti
Page 279 and 280:
Udbuddet Forallebygherrer Udvælgel
Page 281 and 282:
gesektorenharogså-bl.a.inspirereti
Page 283 and 284:
Bygherrensførsteafklaring: Forall
Page 285 and 286:
Offentligtudbud Begrænsetudbud S
Page 287 and 288:
trakt gennemgangsmøde, projektgran
Page 289:
ISBN8791200628
show all

Udvælgelses- dan og tildelingskriter ske byggesektor ... - RenProces

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?