27.07.2013 Views

Udvælgelses- dan og tildelingskriter ske byggesektor ... - RenProces

Udvælgelses- dan og tildelingskriter ske byggesektor ... - RenProces

Udvælgelses- dan og tildelingskriter ske byggesektor ... - RenProces

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

How will the company ensure a good aesthetic quality of the project?<br />

Does the company see advantages in using principles from partnering and lean<br />

construction in connection with developing and realising the heating plant?<br />

Is the company willing to cooperate with some of the other consulting engineers, who<br />

are invited to an interview or does the company it selves resolve the problem better?<br />

After the interviews a meeting took place between the client’s board of director and the<br />

operating staff at the district heating plant. After that the client’s board of directors decided to<br />

assign the job to the local consulting engineer who made the account.<br />

3.1.2 Machine part<br />

The procurement of the machine part followed the EU-directives about utility companies with<br />

negotiation. This first meant a normal prequalification. Call for prequalification was public in<br />

the Official Journal of EU and the selection criteria were that the companies had to be qualified<br />

for the work. Applications were received from three companies. They all had enclosed<br />

references from earlier works. The client considered the three companies qualified for doing the<br />

work.<br />

After the prequalification the three companies were a<strong>ske</strong>d to make an offer with negotiation. For<br />

this offer the client made a description containing work descriptions and particular conditions.<br />

The particular conditions contained four assignment criteria: Overall economy (weighting<br />

50%), operational reliability (weighting 20%), simple maintenance (weighting 20%) and the<br />

contractor’s structure of the supply organisation (weighting 10%).<br />

After negotiations and clarifications of the three offers the winner was found. The result<br />

appeared with a ten pages evaluation made by the consulting engineer. Every criterion had been<br />

examined and the companies had been compared and biased with each other. A summary of the<br />

conclusion was send to all the bidders and the contract negotiation was completed with the<br />

winning company.<br />

3.1.3 Building part<br />

The building part was not offered in a normal way. The client compiled a list of five contractors<br />

which the client in consultation with the client’s board of directors, operating staff and the<br />

chosen consulting engineer found qualified for making the project. The contractors were<br />

mentioned in the order in which the client found them most qualified for the work – number 1<br />

was the contractor which the client considered the best collaborator.<br />

Criteria for coming on the list were:<br />

Known beforehand by one in the selection board.<br />

227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!