Jahrbuch 2006/2007, Teil 1 - Westdeutsches Tumorzentrum Essen

18. Viehweg P, Heinig A, Amaya B, Alberich T, Laniado M, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. MR-guided interventional breast
procedures considering vacuum biopsy in particular Eur J Radiol. 2002: 42(1): 32 -39.
19. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumlöffel U, Viehweg P, Buchmann J, Lampe D, Spielmann R-P. MR-guided
percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 1656 -1665.
20. Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging-guided large-core
(14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology. 2001 Jul; 220(1): 31- 39.
21. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Magnetic resonance guided localization and biopsy of suspicious breast lesions. Top
Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 Feb; 9(1): 44 -59.
22. American College of Radiology (ACR). ACR BIRADS: Magnetic resonance imaging. In: ACR breast imaging reporting
and data system, BIRADS imaging atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2003: 13 - 30.
23. Heywang SH, Bassermann R, Fenzl G, Nathrat W, Hahn D, Beck R, Krischke I, Eiermann W. MRI of the breast:
histopathologic correlation. Eur J Radiol 1987; 7: 175 -182.
24. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Shapeero LG, Lesnik A, Contesso G, Sarrazin D, Masselot J, Vanel D. Assessment of breast
cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology
1993; 188: 473 - 478.
25. Fischer U, Kopka L, Brinck U, Korabiowska M, Schauer A, Grabbe E. Prognostic value of contrast-enhanced
MR mammography in patients with breast cancer. Eur Radiol 1997; 7: 1002-1005.
26. Kelcz F, Santyr GE, Cron GO, Mongin SJ. Application of a quantitative model to differentiate benign from malignant
lesions detected by dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996; 6: 743-752
27. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, Schild HH. Dynamic breast MR imaging:
are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology. 1999 Apr;
211(1): 101-110.
28. Kuhl CK, Leutner C, Mielcarek P et al. Breast compression interferes with lesion enhancement in contrast-enhanced
MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 205(P): 538.
29. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced
MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology 1997; 203:
137-144.
91