23.02.2013 Views

STREET ARTISTS IN EUROPE - Fondazione Fitzcarraldo

STREET ARTISTS IN EUROPE - Fondazione Fitzcarraldo

STREET ARTISTS IN EUROPE - Fondazione Fitzcarraldo

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Street Artists in Europe<br />

only rebellion summoned by the spectators during a presentation of “Learning to fly” (the<br />

Artists o the Street Festival in Szczecin, July 2006), was the defence of the pillows on which<br />

they were sitting.<br />

When, at the end of the performance, the guards open the ‘gates of prison’ nobody moves. Only<br />

with shouted commands the actors round up the spectators from the beds and arranged in penal<br />

two rows, after which they are taken out of the space of the play. When the guards melt away,<br />

the helpless two rows stand still for a while, looking around with uncertainty, before they decide<br />

to start ‘learning to fly.’ (Actors’ reports tell us that the French spectators at the Aurillac festival<br />

reacted differently. The question remains, however, if this was due to the fact that they were<br />

more resistant to ‘captivity’ or because the French tradition of street theatre taught them an easy<br />

interaction with the performers. The defeat (or maybe not?) of the performance of The Zone of<br />

Silence Theatre shows very clearly the re-evaluations the theatre has gone through – the theatre<br />

which at its beginning wanted to stand among people, at the agora and take a vote in a matter<br />

significant for society. There is no agora in the city space, the street theatre has become an<br />

outdoor entertainment of the middle class – because it treats itself this way and as such it is<br />

treated by the spectators. Even if it still wants to take a vote in matters important for the society,<br />

it does it more and more often in a language of carnival fun. Small wonder that it is difficult to<br />

understand what it means by it. The Polish street has currently become an ‘anti-theatrical’ place,<br />

its own ‘performability’ is able to successfully suppress the theatrical action, the agora is<br />

someplace else, and no one really wants to ‘catch’ spectators in their ‘natural space,’ it is better<br />

to invite them or even ‘contract’ them through the act of ticket purchase.<br />

We are not opponents of the street theatre (currently, a more appropriate term would possibly be<br />

‘open space theatre’) – on the contrary, we like it very much. However, we are of the opinion<br />

that it is time to demythologize it - forget about intellectual carbon copies, which force to write<br />

about the ‘democratic,’ ‘common’ theatre that approaches people, appropriating the whole city<br />

space. This is because the theatre has changed, as well as the world around it.<br />

A statement of Pawel Szkotak, the leader of Biuro Podrózy Theatre, the director of world<br />

famous street performances, such as “Giordano” (1992) or “Carmen Funebre” (1993),<br />

“Moonwalkers” (2000), “Pigpolis” (2003) can be a sombre death knell for the street theatre.<br />

When asked, in the broader context of negotiations with the Iranian censorship regarding the<br />

performance of “Swiniopolis” (“Pigpolis”), if he can imagine the return to the times of<br />

censorship in Poland, Skotak answered: “(...) If they returned, one would have to reach for much<br />

more radical means than a theatrical performance” 451 .<br />

Spectacular feature of the world imposed on us by nature, described by Filipowicz in the<br />

description of the world of concepts of Aristotle, imposes on people, including artists, the<br />

obligation to take the challenge to shape the reality in order to achieve the ‘good.’ It anticipated<br />

the activity of all the members of the process, the need of its ‘materialisation,’ authentication<br />

with one’s life. The current ‘spectacularity’ of reality pushes us only to consumption, because –<br />

as remarked by Debord – “the world (...), which is made visible by the spectacle, is the world of<br />

a product, which has possessed everything that is directly lived through” 452 . As added by Ritzer:<br />

“People, as spectators, do not participate in these performances, as a matter of fact they are<br />

isolated from them. They watch performances, because they are attractive; but they are<br />

performed for them, and they are not an integral part of the performances. (...) In the days of old,<br />

a performance was usually an integral part of the daily life and it took its beginning from it (e.g.<br />

a village marketplace). In the current society a performance is not an integral part of a usual life.<br />

451 Biuro Podróży in Iran. ‘Pyrania’ (a supplement to ‘Gazeta Wyborcza’), 20.10.2006.<br />

452 Guy Debord, Society..., p. 21-22.<br />

307<br />

PE 375.307

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!