STREET ARTISTS IN EUROPE - Fondazione Fitzcarraldo
STREET ARTISTS IN EUROPE - Fondazione Fitzcarraldo
STREET ARTISTS IN EUROPE - Fondazione Fitzcarraldo
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Street Artists in Europe<br />
only rebellion summoned by the spectators during a presentation of “Learning to fly” (the<br />
Artists o the Street Festival in Szczecin, July 2006), was the defence of the pillows on which<br />
they were sitting.<br />
When, at the end of the performance, the guards open the ‘gates of prison’ nobody moves. Only<br />
with shouted commands the actors round up the spectators from the beds and arranged in penal<br />
two rows, after which they are taken out of the space of the play. When the guards melt away,<br />
the helpless two rows stand still for a while, looking around with uncertainty, before they decide<br />
to start ‘learning to fly.’ (Actors’ reports tell us that the French spectators at the Aurillac festival<br />
reacted differently. The question remains, however, if this was due to the fact that they were<br />
more resistant to ‘captivity’ or because the French tradition of street theatre taught them an easy<br />
interaction with the performers. The defeat (or maybe not?) of the performance of The Zone of<br />
Silence Theatre shows very clearly the re-evaluations the theatre has gone through – the theatre<br />
which at its beginning wanted to stand among people, at the agora and take a vote in a matter<br />
significant for society. There is no agora in the city space, the street theatre has become an<br />
outdoor entertainment of the middle class – because it treats itself this way and as such it is<br />
treated by the spectators. Even if it still wants to take a vote in matters important for the society,<br />
it does it more and more often in a language of carnival fun. Small wonder that it is difficult to<br />
understand what it means by it. The Polish street has currently become an ‘anti-theatrical’ place,<br />
its own ‘performability’ is able to successfully suppress the theatrical action, the agora is<br />
someplace else, and no one really wants to ‘catch’ spectators in their ‘natural space,’ it is better<br />
to invite them or even ‘contract’ them through the act of ticket purchase.<br />
We are not opponents of the street theatre (currently, a more appropriate term would possibly be<br />
‘open space theatre’) – on the contrary, we like it very much. However, we are of the opinion<br />
that it is time to demythologize it - forget about intellectual carbon copies, which force to write<br />
about the ‘democratic,’ ‘common’ theatre that approaches people, appropriating the whole city<br />
space. This is because the theatre has changed, as well as the world around it.<br />
A statement of Pawel Szkotak, the leader of Biuro Podrózy Theatre, the director of world<br />
famous street performances, such as “Giordano” (1992) or “Carmen Funebre” (1993),<br />
“Moonwalkers” (2000), “Pigpolis” (2003) can be a sombre death knell for the street theatre.<br />
When asked, in the broader context of negotiations with the Iranian censorship regarding the<br />
performance of “Swiniopolis” (“Pigpolis”), if he can imagine the return to the times of<br />
censorship in Poland, Skotak answered: “(...) If they returned, one would have to reach for much<br />
more radical means than a theatrical performance” 451 .<br />
Spectacular feature of the world imposed on us by nature, described by Filipowicz in the<br />
description of the world of concepts of Aristotle, imposes on people, including artists, the<br />
obligation to take the challenge to shape the reality in order to achieve the ‘good.’ It anticipated<br />
the activity of all the members of the process, the need of its ‘materialisation,’ authentication<br />
with one’s life. The current ‘spectacularity’ of reality pushes us only to consumption, because –<br />
as remarked by Debord – “the world (...), which is made visible by the spectacle, is the world of<br />
a product, which has possessed everything that is directly lived through” 452 . As added by Ritzer:<br />
“People, as spectators, do not participate in these performances, as a matter of fact they are<br />
isolated from them. They watch performances, because they are attractive; but they are<br />
performed for them, and they are not an integral part of the performances. (...) In the days of old,<br />
a performance was usually an integral part of the daily life and it took its beginning from it (e.g.<br />
a village marketplace). In the current society a performance is not an integral part of a usual life.<br />
451 Biuro Podróży in Iran. ‘Pyrania’ (a supplement to ‘Gazeta Wyborcza’), 20.10.2006.<br />
452 Guy Debord, Society..., p. 21-22.<br />
307<br />
PE 375.307