27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

92<br />

the early 1300s to about two million by the early 1400s. Europe’s population<br />

dropped by a quarter.<br />

After the Black Death depopulated the countryside, landlords competed<br />

to retain tenant farmers by granting them lifelong or inheritable rights to<br />

the land they worked in exchange for modest rents. As the population<br />

rebounded, a final push <strong>of</strong> agricultural expansion filled out the landscape<br />

with farms in the early sixteenth century. Starting in the late 1500s landlords<br />

motivated by the promise <strong>of</strong> getting higher rents from leasing land at<br />

inflated rates began enclosing lands formerly grazed in common. Already<br />

out <strong>of</strong> land and surrounded by powerful neighbors, the Dutch started their<br />

ambitious campaign to take land from the sea.<br />

John Fitzherbert’s 1523 Book <strong>of</strong> Surveying, the first work on agriculture<br />

published in English, held that the way to increase the value <strong>of</strong> a township<br />

was to consolidate rights to common fields and pasture into single enclosed<br />

tracts next to each farmer’s house. Over the next several centuries this idea<br />

<strong>of</strong> reorganizing the commons to give every farmer three acres and a cow<br />

evolved into transforming the English countryside into large estates, portions<br />

<strong>of</strong> which could be rented out pr<strong>of</strong>itably to tenant farmers. Except for<br />

the peasants working the land, most thought that privatizing the commons<br />

would injure none, and benefit all by increasing agricultural production.<br />

In the tumultuous sixteenth and seventeenth centuries much <strong>of</strong> England’s<br />

agricultural land changed hands in Henry VIII’s war against the<br />

Catholic Church, the wars <strong>of</strong> succession, and the English Civil War. <strong>The</strong><br />

insecurity <strong>of</strong> land tenure discouraged investing in land improvement. By<br />

the second half <strong>of</strong> the seventeenth century, some argued that England<br />

should adopt the Flemish custom <strong>of</strong> agricultural leases under which the<br />

owner would pay a specified sum to the tenant if four impartial persons,<br />

two selected by the landlord and two by the tenant, agreed that the soil had<br />

been improved at the end <strong>of</strong> the lease.<br />

As Europe’s climate slid from the medieval warm period into the Little<br />

Ice Age (which lasted from about ad 1430 to 1850), extended cold periods<br />

meant shorter growing seasons, reduced crop yields, and less arable land.<br />

Perennially living on the edge, the lower classes were vulnerable to severe<br />

food shortages after bad harvests. Governments monitored the price <strong>of</strong><br />

bread to gauge the potential for social instability.<br />

Desire for land reform among the peasantry, fueled by instability and<br />

shortages, would help trigger the Reformation. Land held by the Church<br />

had grown over the centuries far beyond the fields cleared by monks,<br />

let them eat colonies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!