27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

eplacing water-holding capacity lost to soil erosion and for using fertilizers<br />

to replace lost soil nutrients. <strong>The</strong>y also estimated <strong>of</strong>f-site costs for<br />

increased flood damage, lost reservoir capacity, and dredging <strong>of</strong> silt-choked<br />

rivers to maintain navigation. <strong>The</strong>y estimated that undoing damage caused<br />

by soil erosion would cost the United States $44 billion a year, and about<br />

$400 billion a year worldwide, more than $70 per person on the planet—<br />

higher than the annual income for most people.<br />

Pimentel’s group estimated that it would take an annual investment <strong>of</strong><br />

about $6 billion to bring erosion rates on U.S. cropland into line with soil<br />

production. An additional $2 billion a year would do so on U.S. pasturelands.<br />

Each dollar invested in soil conservation would save society more<br />

than five dollars.<br />

In the short term, though, it can be cheaper for farmers to disregard soil<br />

conservation; the cost <strong>of</strong> reducing soil erosion can be several times the<br />

immediate economic benefit <strong>of</strong> doing so. Farmers with high debt and/or a<br />

narrow pr<strong>of</strong>it margin can be forced to choose between conserving soil and<br />

going bankrupt or working the land until it becomes economically futile.<br />

Economic and political incentives encourage practices that destroy soil<br />

productivity over the long run, yet preserving the agricultural foundation<br />

<strong>of</strong> civilization requires protecting land from accelerated soil erosion and<br />

conversion to other uses.<br />

Many soil conservation measures are proven technologies. Measures<br />

adopted to curb soil erosion after the Dust Bowl were not new ideas—<br />

contour plowing and cover cropping were known more than a century<br />

before. Crop rotations, mulching, and the use <strong>of</strong> cover crops are ancient<br />

ideas. So is terracing, which can reduce erosion by 90 percent, enough to<br />

<strong>of</strong>fset the typical increase in erosion rates from cultivation.<br />

Soil conservation trials in Texas, Missouri, and Illinois slowed erosion by<br />

a factor <strong>of</strong> two to a thousand and increased crop yields by up to a quarter<br />

for crops like cotton, corn, soybeans, and wheat. Soil conservation is not<br />

radical new territory. Many <strong>of</strong> the most effective methods have been recognized<br />

for centuries.<br />

Despite compelling evidence that soil erosion destroyed ancient societies,<br />

and can seriously undermine modern societies, some warnings <strong>of</strong> an<br />

impending global soil crisis and food shortages have been overblown. In<br />

the early 1980s agricultural economist Lester Brown warned that modern<br />

civilization could run out <strong>of</strong> dirt before oil. Failure <strong>of</strong> such alarming predictions<br />

to play out over the past several decades helped conventional<br />

dust blow 175

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!