Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
eplacing water-holding capacity lost to soil erosion and for using fertilizers<br />
to replace lost soil nutrients. <strong>The</strong>y also estimated <strong>of</strong>f-site costs for<br />
increased flood damage, lost reservoir capacity, and dredging <strong>of</strong> silt-choked<br />
rivers to maintain navigation. <strong>The</strong>y estimated that undoing damage caused<br />
by soil erosion would cost the United States $44 billion a year, and about<br />
$400 billion a year worldwide, more than $70 per person on the planet—<br />
higher than the annual income for most people.<br />
Pimentel’s group estimated that it would take an annual investment <strong>of</strong><br />
about $6 billion to bring erosion rates on U.S. cropland into line with soil<br />
production. An additional $2 billion a year would do so on U.S. pasturelands.<br />
Each dollar invested in soil conservation would save society more<br />
than five dollars.<br />
In the short term, though, it can be cheaper for farmers to disregard soil<br />
conservation; the cost <strong>of</strong> reducing soil erosion can be several times the<br />
immediate economic benefit <strong>of</strong> doing so. Farmers with high debt and/or a<br />
narrow pr<strong>of</strong>it margin can be forced to choose between conserving soil and<br />
going bankrupt or working the land until it becomes economically futile.<br />
Economic and political incentives encourage practices that destroy soil<br />
productivity over the long run, yet preserving the agricultural foundation<br />
<strong>of</strong> civilization requires protecting land from accelerated soil erosion and<br />
conversion to other uses.<br />
Many soil conservation measures are proven technologies. Measures<br />
adopted to curb soil erosion after the Dust Bowl were not new ideas—<br />
contour plowing and cover cropping were known more than a century<br />
before. Crop rotations, mulching, and the use <strong>of</strong> cover crops are ancient<br />
ideas. So is terracing, which can reduce erosion by 90 percent, enough to<br />
<strong>of</strong>fset the typical increase in erosion rates from cultivation.<br />
Soil conservation trials in Texas, Missouri, and Illinois slowed erosion by<br />
a factor <strong>of</strong> two to a thousand and increased crop yields by up to a quarter<br />
for crops like cotton, corn, soybeans, and wheat. Soil conservation is not<br />
radical new territory. Many <strong>of</strong> the most effective methods have been recognized<br />
for centuries.<br />
Despite compelling evidence that soil erosion destroyed ancient societies,<br />
and can seriously undermine modern societies, some warnings <strong>of</strong> an<br />
impending global soil crisis and food shortages have been overblown. In<br />
the early 1980s agricultural economist Lester Brown warned that modern<br />
civilization could run out <strong>of</strong> dirt before oil. Failure <strong>of</strong> such alarming predictions<br />
to play out over the past several decades helped conventional<br />
dust blow 175