27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ecause the Church seldom relinquished land bequeathed by the faithful.<br />

Instead, bishops and abbots rented out God’s land to poor, land-hungry<br />

peasants. By the fifteenth century the Church, which owned as much as<br />

four-fifths <strong>of</strong> the land in some areas, overtook the nobility as Europe’s<br />

largest landlord. Monarchs and their allies seeking to seize church lands<br />

harnessed widespread resentment among tenants. Popular support for the<br />

Reformation rested as much on desire for land as the promise <strong>of</strong> religious<br />

freedom.<br />

An increasing demand for crops meant less pasture, little overwinter animal<br />

fodder, and not enough manure to sustain soil fertility. As the population<br />

kept rising, intensively cultivated land rapidly lost productive capacity—increasing<br />

the need to plant more marginal land. Shortage <strong>of</strong> vacant<br />

land to plow helped motivate the rediscovery <strong>of</strong> Roman agricultural practices<br />

such as crop rotations, manuring, and composting.<br />

Renewed curiosity about the natural world also stimulated agricultural<br />

experimentation. In the sixteenth century, Bernard Palissy argued that<br />

plant ashes made good fertilizer because they consisted <strong>of</strong> material that the<br />

plants had pulled from the soil and could therefore reuse to fuel the growth<br />

<strong>of</strong> new plants. In the early 1600s Belgian philosopher Jan Baptista van Helmont<br />

tried to settle the question <strong>of</strong> whether plants were made <strong>of</strong> earth, air,<br />

fire, or water. He planted a seedling tree in two hundred pounds <strong>of</strong> soil,<br />

protected it from dust, and let it grow for five years, adding only water.<br />

Finding that the tree had grown by one hundred and seventy pounds,<br />

whereas the soil had lost an insignificant two ounces, van Helmont concluded<br />

that the tree had grown from water—the only thing added to the<br />

process. Given that the soil had lost but a minuscule fraction <strong>of</strong> the weight<br />

<strong>of</strong> the tree, he dismissed the potential for earth to have contributed to the<br />

tree’s growth. I doubt that he ever seriously considered air as a major contributor<br />

to the mass <strong>of</strong> the tree. It took a few more centuries before people<br />

discovered carbon dioxide and came to understand photosynthesis.<br />

In the meantime, agricultural “improvers” came to prominence in the<br />

seventeenth century once the landscape was fully cultivated. Most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

low hills and shallow valleys <strong>of</strong> the Netherlands are covered by quartz-rich<br />

sand ill suited for agriculture. Supporting a growing population on their<br />

naturally poor soils, the Dutch began mixing manure, leaves, and other<br />

organic waste into their dirt. Working relatively flat land where erosion was<br />

not a problem, over time they built up dark, organic-rich soils to as much<br />

as three feet thick. Lacking more land, they made soil. As the Dutch had,<br />

let them eat colonies 93

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!