27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Soil erosion rapidly became a major problem once the loess was cleared<br />

and plowed. In the early 1900s Washington State <strong>Agricultural</strong> College’s<br />

William Spillman toured the region lecturing on the threat <strong>of</strong> soil erosion<br />

from the common practice <strong>of</strong> leaving plowed fields bare each summer. Few<br />

heeded the young pr<strong>of</strong>essor’s warning that each year’s annoying rills would<br />

eventually add up to a serious problem.<br />

In the 1930s tractors began replacing horse-drawn plows in the Palouse<br />

and elsewhere, allowing a single operator to farm much larger acreages.<br />

Eager to capitalize on the greater labor efficiency, landowners changed the<br />

traditional arrangement for sharecropping on leased land. Instead <strong>of</strong> keeping<br />

two-thirds <strong>of</strong> what they grew, tenants were now allowed to keep just<br />

over half. So tenants worked the land that much harder, reducing outlays<br />

for luxuries like erosion control. Farmers were now working more land,<br />

but not necessarily making more money.<br />

By 1950 a USDA survey reported that all <strong>of</strong> the original topsoil was missing<br />

from 10 percent <strong>of</strong> Palouse farmland. Between 25 and 75 percent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

topsoil was missing from an additional 80 percent <strong>of</strong> the land. Just 10 percent<br />

<strong>of</strong> the region retained more than 75 percent <strong>of</strong> its original soil. Annual<br />

surveys <strong>of</strong> soil loss from 1939 to 1960 showed an average loss <strong>of</strong> half an inch<br />

a decade. On slopes steeper than about fifteen degrees, soil loss averaged<br />

an inch every five years.<br />

A cistern installed in 1911 on a farm near Thornton dramatically illustrates<br />

the effect <strong>of</strong> plowing sloping fields. Originally projecting about a<br />

foot and a half above the adjacent hilltop, by 1942 it stuck out nearly four<br />

feet above the surrounding field. By 1959 the same cistern stood six feet<br />

above the field. Four and a half feet <strong>of</strong> soil had been plowed <strong>of</strong>f the slope<br />

in less than fifty years—about an inch a year. Some eastern Idaho soils that<br />

were more than a foot thick in the early twentieth century were barely deep<br />

enough to plow by the 1960s when just half a foot <strong>of</strong> soil remained above<br />

bedrock.<br />

From 1939 to 1979 the total erosion on Palouse cropland averaged more<br />

than nine tons per acre per year; and reached more than one hundred tons<br />

per acre per year on steep slopes. <strong>Erosion</strong> rates on unplowed rangeland and<br />

forested land averaged less than one ton per acre per year. Plowing the loess<br />

increased erosion rates by a factor <strong>of</strong> ten to a hundred, with most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

loss caused by erosion from run<strong>of</strong>f across newly plowed ground. Simple<br />

soil conservation measures could halve erosion without reducing farm<br />

income. But doing so requires fundamental changes in farming practices.<br />

dust blow 161

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!