Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
172<br />
Enough American farms disappeared beneath concrete to cover<br />
Nebraska in the three decades from 1945 to 1975. Each year between 1967<br />
and 1977, urbanization converted almost a million acres <strong>of</strong> U.S. farmland<br />
to nonagricultural uses. In the 1970s and 1980s over a hundred acres <strong>of</strong><br />
U.S. cropland was converted to nonagricultural uses every hour. Urban<br />
expansion gobbled up several percent <strong>of</strong> the best European farmland in the<br />
1960s. Already, urbanization has paved over 15 percent <strong>of</strong> Britain’s agricultural<br />
land. <strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> urban areas continues to consume farmland<br />
needed to feed cities.<br />
During the cold war, the Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture developed tolerance<br />
values for soil loss to evaluate the potential for different soils to sustain<br />
long-term agricultural production. <strong>The</strong>se values were based on both<br />
technical and social inputs—what was considered economically and technically<br />
feasible in the 1950s. Soil conservation planning based on this<br />
approach typically defines acceptable rates <strong>of</strong> soil erosion as 5 to 13 tons per<br />
hectare per year (2–10 tons per acre per year), equivalent to a loss <strong>of</strong> an inch<br />
<strong>of</strong> soil in 25 to 125 years (0.2 to 1 mm per year). However, agronomists generally<br />
argue that maintaining soil productivity requires keeping erosion<br />
under 1 ton per hectare per year—loss <strong>of</strong> less than one inch in 250 years—<br />
2 to 10 times lower than USDA soil loss tolerance values.<br />
Until recent decades, little hard data were available on rates <strong>of</strong> soil production.<br />
So it was hard to know how big a deal to make out <strong>of</strong> this problem.<br />
Farms were losing soil faster than desired, but it was easy to lose sight<br />
<strong>of</strong> the big picture when farmers were struggling to deal with overproduction<br />
and food was cheap. Recent studies using a variety <strong>of</strong> methods, however,<br />
all point to soil production rates much lower than USDA soil loss tolerance<br />
values. A review <strong>of</strong> soil production rates from watersheds around<br />
the world found rates <strong>of</strong> from less than 0.1 to 1.9 tons per hectare per year,<br />
indicating that the time required to make an inch <strong>of</strong> soil varies from about<br />
160 years in heather-covered Scotland to more than 4,000 years under<br />
deciduous forest in Maryland. Likewise, a global geochemical mass balance<br />
based on budgets <strong>of</strong> the seven major elements in the earth’s crust,<br />
soils, and waters pegs the average global rate <strong>of</strong> soil production at between<br />
an inch in 240 years to an inch in 820 years (equivalent to an erosion rate<br />
<strong>of</strong> 0.37 to 1.29 tons per hectare per year). For the loess soils <strong>of</strong> the Great<br />
Plains a soil replacement rate <strong>of</strong> an inch every 500 years is more realistic<br />
than the USDA’s acceptable soil loss rates. Hence, the currently “acceptable”<br />
rates <strong>of</strong> soil loss are unsustainable over the long run, as they allow soil<br />
erosion to proceed four to twenty-five times faster than soil production.<br />
dust blow