27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

On a more optimistic note—as we ponder whether agriculture will be able<br />

to keep up with the world’s population—we might take comfort in the<br />

amazing twentieth-century growth in agricultural production.<br />

Until the widespread adoption <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers, growth in agricultural<br />

productivity was relatively gradual. Improvements in equipment,<br />

crop rotations, and land drainage doubled both European and Chinese<br />

crop yields between the thirteenth and nineteenth centuries. Traditional<br />

agricultural practices were abandoned as obsolete when discovery <strong>of</strong> the<br />

elements that form soil nutrients set the stage for the rise <strong>of</strong> industrial<br />

agrochemistry.<br />

Major scientific advances fundamental to soil chemistry occurred in the<br />

late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Daniel Rutherford and<br />

Antoine Lavoisier respectively discovered nitrogen and phosphorus four<br />

years before the American Revolution. Humphrey Davy discovered potassium<br />

and calcium in 1808. Twenty years later Friederich Wöhler synthesized<br />

urea from ammonia and cyanuric acid, showing it was possible to<br />

manufacture organic compounds.<br />

Humphrey Davy endorsed the popular theory that manure helped sustain<br />

harvests because organic matter was the source <strong>of</strong> soil fertility. <strong>The</strong>n in<br />

1840 Justus von Liebig showed that plants can grow without organic compounds.<br />

Even so, Liebig recommended building soil organic matter<br />

through manure and cultivation <strong>of</strong> legumes and grasses. But Liebig also<br />

argued that other substances with the same essential constituents could<br />

replace animal excrement. “It must be admitted as a principle <strong>of</strong> agriculture,<br />

that those substances which have been removed from a soil must be<br />

completely restored to it, and whether this restoration be effected by means<br />

<strong>of</strong> excrements, ashes, or bones, is in a great measure a matter <strong>of</strong> indifference.<br />

A time will come when fields will be manured with a solution ...prepared<br />

in chemical manufactories.” 1 This last idea was revolutionary.<br />

Liebig’s experiments and theories laid the foundation <strong>of</strong> modern agrochemistry.<br />

He discovered that plant growth was limited by the element in<br />

shortest supply relative to the plant’s needs. He was convinced that crops<br />

could be grown continuously, without fallowing, by adding the right<br />

nutrients to the soil. Liebig’s discovery opened the door to seeing the soil<br />

as a chemical warehouse through which to supply crop growth.<br />

Inspired by Liebig, in 1843 John Bennet Lawes began comparing crop<br />

yields from fertilized and unfertilized fields on Rothamsted farm, his family’s<br />

estate just north <strong>of</strong> London. An amateur chemist since boyhood,<br />

Lawes studied chemistry at Oxford but never finished a degree. Nonethe-<br />

dirty business 183

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!