Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
On a more optimistic note—as we ponder whether agriculture will be able<br />
to keep up with the world’s population—we might take comfort in the<br />
amazing twentieth-century growth in agricultural production.<br />
Until the widespread adoption <strong>of</strong> chemical fertilizers, growth in agricultural<br />
productivity was relatively gradual. Improvements in equipment,<br />
crop rotations, and land drainage doubled both European and Chinese<br />
crop yields between the thirteenth and nineteenth centuries. Traditional<br />
agricultural practices were abandoned as obsolete when discovery <strong>of</strong> the<br />
elements that form soil nutrients set the stage for the rise <strong>of</strong> industrial<br />
agrochemistry.<br />
Major scientific advances fundamental to soil chemistry occurred in the<br />
late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Daniel Rutherford and<br />
Antoine Lavoisier respectively discovered nitrogen and phosphorus four<br />
years before the American Revolution. Humphrey Davy discovered potassium<br />
and calcium in 1808. Twenty years later Friederich Wöhler synthesized<br />
urea from ammonia and cyanuric acid, showing it was possible to<br />
manufacture organic compounds.<br />
Humphrey Davy endorsed the popular theory that manure helped sustain<br />
harvests because organic matter was the source <strong>of</strong> soil fertility. <strong>The</strong>n in<br />
1840 Justus von Liebig showed that plants can grow without organic compounds.<br />
Even so, Liebig recommended building soil organic matter<br />
through manure and cultivation <strong>of</strong> legumes and grasses. But Liebig also<br />
argued that other substances with the same essential constituents could<br />
replace animal excrement. “It must be admitted as a principle <strong>of</strong> agriculture,<br />
that those substances which have been removed from a soil must be<br />
completely restored to it, and whether this restoration be effected by means<br />
<strong>of</strong> excrements, ashes, or bones, is in a great measure a matter <strong>of</strong> indifference.<br />
A time will come when fields will be manured with a solution ...prepared<br />
in chemical manufactories.” 1 This last idea was revolutionary.<br />
Liebig’s experiments and theories laid the foundation <strong>of</strong> modern agrochemistry.<br />
He discovered that plant growth was limited by the element in<br />
shortest supply relative to the plant’s needs. He was convinced that crops<br />
could be grown continuously, without fallowing, by adding the right<br />
nutrients to the soil. Liebig’s discovery opened the door to seeing the soil<br />
as a chemical warehouse through which to supply crop growth.<br />
Inspired by Liebig, in 1843 John Bennet Lawes began comparing crop<br />
yields from fertilized and unfertilized fields on Rothamsted farm, his family’s<br />
estate just north <strong>of</strong> London. An amateur chemist since boyhood,<br />
Lawes studied chemistry at Oxford but never finished a degree. Nonethe-<br />
dirty business 183