27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

104<br />

Despite such pr<strong>of</strong>iteering, by 1868 almost two hundred thousand acres <strong>of</strong><br />

the High Alps had been replanted with trees or restored to meadow.<br />

Touring southern France before the Second World War, Walter Lowdermilk<br />

found intensive farming practiced on both steep slopes and valley<br />

floors. Some farmers maintained hillslope terraces like those built by the<br />

ancient Phoenicians. Lowdermilk marveled over how in eastern France,<br />

where terracing was uncommon, farmers would collect soil from the lowest<br />

furrow on a field, load it into a cart, haul it back up the slope, and dump<br />

it into the uppermost furrow. Centuries ago when this practice began,<br />

peasant farmers knew that they had upset the balance between soil production<br />

and erosion, and that people living on the land would inherit the<br />

consequences. <strong>The</strong>y probably did not appreciate how far they were ahead<br />

<strong>of</strong> Europe’s gentlemen scientists in understanding the nature <strong>of</strong> soils.<br />

At the May 5, 1887, meeting <strong>of</strong> the Edinburgh Geological <strong>Society</strong>, vice<br />

president James Melvin read from an unpublished manuscript by James<br />

Hutton, the Scottish founder <strong>of</strong> modern geology. <strong>The</strong> rediscovered work<br />

revealed the formative geologic insights Hutton had gained from farming<br />

the land, observing and thinking about relationships among vegetation,<br />

soil, and the underlying rocks. In particular, Melvin appreciated the parallels<br />

between Hutton’s century-old musings and Darwin’s newly published<br />

book on worms.<br />

Hutton saw soil as the source <strong>of</strong> all life where worms mix dead animals<br />

with fallen leaves and mineral soil to build fertility. He thought that hillslope<br />

soils came from the underlying rock, whereas valley bottom soils<br />

developed on dirt reworked from somewhere upstream. Soil was a mix <strong>of</strong><br />

broken rock from below and organic matter from above, producing dirt<br />

unique to each pairing <strong>of</strong> rocks and plant communities. Forests generally<br />

produced fine soils. “[A forest] maintains a multitude <strong>of</strong> animals which die<br />

and are returned to the soil; secondly, it sheds an annual crop <strong>of</strong> leaves,<br />

which contribute in some measure to the fertility <strong>of</strong> the soil; and lastly, the<br />

soil thus enriched with animal and vegetable bodies feeds the worms ...<br />

which penetrate the soil, and introduce fertility as they multiply.” 12 Anticipating<br />

Darwin in recognizing the role <strong>of</strong> worms in maintaining soil fertility,<br />

Hutton also understood the role <strong>of</strong> vegetation in establishing soil characteristics.<br />

<strong>The</strong> visionary geologist saw soil as the living bridge between rock<br />

and life maintained by returning organic matter to the soil.<br />

At the close <strong>of</strong> the eighteenth century—long before Melvin rediscovered<br />

Hutton’s lost manuscript—Hutton argued with Swiss émigré Jean André<br />

de Luc over the role <strong>of</strong> erosion in shaping landscapes. De Luc held that ero-<br />

let them eat colonies

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!