Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
104<br />
Despite such pr<strong>of</strong>iteering, by 1868 almost two hundred thousand acres <strong>of</strong><br />
the High Alps had been replanted with trees or restored to meadow.<br />
Touring southern France before the Second World War, Walter Lowdermilk<br />
found intensive farming practiced on both steep slopes and valley<br />
floors. Some farmers maintained hillslope terraces like those built by the<br />
ancient Phoenicians. Lowdermilk marveled over how in eastern France,<br />
where terracing was uncommon, farmers would collect soil from the lowest<br />
furrow on a field, load it into a cart, haul it back up the slope, and dump<br />
it into the uppermost furrow. Centuries ago when this practice began,<br />
peasant farmers knew that they had upset the balance between soil production<br />
and erosion, and that people living on the land would inherit the<br />
consequences. <strong>The</strong>y probably did not appreciate how far they were ahead<br />
<strong>of</strong> Europe’s gentlemen scientists in understanding the nature <strong>of</strong> soils.<br />
At the May 5, 1887, meeting <strong>of</strong> the Edinburgh Geological <strong>Society</strong>, vice<br />
president James Melvin read from an unpublished manuscript by James<br />
Hutton, the Scottish founder <strong>of</strong> modern geology. <strong>The</strong> rediscovered work<br />
revealed the formative geologic insights Hutton had gained from farming<br />
the land, observing and thinking about relationships among vegetation,<br />
soil, and the underlying rocks. In particular, Melvin appreciated the parallels<br />
between Hutton’s century-old musings and Darwin’s newly published<br />
book on worms.<br />
Hutton saw soil as the source <strong>of</strong> all life where worms mix dead animals<br />
with fallen leaves and mineral soil to build fertility. He thought that hillslope<br />
soils came from the underlying rock, whereas valley bottom soils<br />
developed on dirt reworked from somewhere upstream. Soil was a mix <strong>of</strong><br />
broken rock from below and organic matter from above, producing dirt<br />
unique to each pairing <strong>of</strong> rocks and plant communities. Forests generally<br />
produced fine soils. “[A forest] maintains a multitude <strong>of</strong> animals which die<br />
and are returned to the soil; secondly, it sheds an annual crop <strong>of</strong> leaves,<br />
which contribute in some measure to the fertility <strong>of</strong> the soil; and lastly, the<br />
soil thus enriched with animal and vegetable bodies feeds the worms ...<br />
which penetrate the soil, and introduce fertility as they multiply.” 12 Anticipating<br />
Darwin in recognizing the role <strong>of</strong> worms in maintaining soil fertility,<br />
Hutton also understood the role <strong>of</strong> vegetation in establishing soil characteristics.<br />
<strong>The</strong> visionary geologist saw soil as the living bridge between rock<br />
and life maintained by returning organic matter to the soil.<br />
At the close <strong>of</strong> the eighteenth century—long before Melvin rediscovered<br />
Hutton’s lost manuscript—Hutton argued with Swiss émigré Jean André<br />
de Luc over the role <strong>of</strong> erosion in shaping landscapes. De Luc held that ero-<br />
let them eat colonies