27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

192<br />

important was the mix <strong>of</strong> silt, sand, and clay. Based on bulk chemistry,<br />

Whitney had a point. But Hilgard knew that not everything in a soil was<br />

available to plants.<br />

In 1901 Whitney was appointed chief <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture’s<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Soils. <strong>The</strong> new bureau launched a massive national soil<br />

and land survey, published detailed soil survey maps for use by farmers,<br />

and exuded confidence in the nation’s dirt, believing that all soils contained<br />

enough inorganic elements to grow any crop. “<strong>The</strong> soil is the one<br />

indestructible, immutable asset that the Nation possesses. It is the one<br />

resource that cannot be exhausted; that cannot be used up.” 4 Outraged, an<br />

aging Hilgard complained about the lack <strong>of</strong> geologic and chemical information<br />

in the new bureau’s surveys.<br />

Several years before, in 1903, Whitney had published a USDA bulletin<br />

arguing that all soils contained strikingly similar nutrient solutions saturated<br />

in relatively insoluble minerals. According to Whitney, soil fertility<br />

simply depended on cultural methods used to grow food rather than the<br />

native ability <strong>of</strong> the soil to support plant growth. Soil fertility was virtually<br />

limitless. An incensed Hilgard devoted his waning years to battling the<br />

politically connected Whitney’s growing influence.<br />

A year before he published the controversial bulletin, Whitney had hired<br />

Franklin King to head a new Division <strong>of</strong> Soil Management. A graduate <strong>of</strong><br />

Cornell University, King had been appointed in 1888 by the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Wisconsin to be the country’s first pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> agricultural physics at the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> forty. Considered the father <strong>of</strong> soil physics in the United States,<br />

King had also studied soil fertility.<br />

King’s stay in Washington was short. In his new post, King studied relations<br />

between bulk soil composition, the levels <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients in soil<br />

solutions, and crop yields. He found that the amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients in soil<br />

solutions differed from amounts suggested by total chemical analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

soil samples but correlated with crop yields—conclusions at odds with<br />

those published by his new boss. Refusing to endorse King’s results, Whitney<br />

forced him to resign from the bureau and return to academia where he<br />

would be less <strong>of</strong> a nuisance.<br />

While Hilgard and Whitney feuded in academic journals, a new concept<br />

evolved <strong>of</strong> soils as ecological systems influenced by geology, chemistry,<br />

meteorology, and biology. In particular, recognition <strong>of</strong> the biological basis<br />

for nitrogen fixation helped lay the foundation for the modern concept <strong>of</strong><br />

the soil as the frontier between geology and biology. Within a century <strong>of</strong><br />

their discovery, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were recognized to<br />

dirty business

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!