27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

192<br />

important was the mix <strong>of</strong> silt, sand, and clay. Based on bulk chemistry,<br />

Whitney had a point. But Hilgard knew that not everything in a soil was<br />

available to plants.<br />

In 1901 Whitney was appointed chief <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture’s<br />

Bureau <strong>of</strong> Soils. <strong>The</strong> new bureau launched a massive national soil<br />

and land survey, published detailed soil survey maps for use by farmers,<br />

and exuded confidence in the nation’s dirt, believing that all soils contained<br />

enough inorganic elements to grow any crop. “<strong>The</strong> soil is the one<br />

indestructible, immutable asset that the Nation possesses. It is the one<br />

resource that cannot be exhausted; that cannot be used up.” 4 Outraged, an<br />

aging Hilgard complained about the lack <strong>of</strong> geologic and chemical information<br />

in the new bureau’s surveys.<br />

Several years before, in 1903, Whitney had published a USDA bulletin<br />

arguing that all soils contained strikingly similar nutrient solutions saturated<br />

in relatively insoluble minerals. According to Whitney, soil fertility<br />

simply depended on cultural methods used to grow food rather than the<br />

native ability <strong>of</strong> the soil to support plant growth. Soil fertility was virtually<br />

limitless. An incensed Hilgard devoted his waning years to battling the<br />

politically connected Whitney’s growing influence.<br />

A year before he published the controversial bulletin, Whitney had hired<br />

Franklin King to head a new Division <strong>of</strong> Soil Management. A graduate <strong>of</strong><br />

Cornell University, King had been appointed in 1888 by the University <strong>of</strong><br />

Wisconsin to be the country’s first pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> agricultural physics at the<br />

age <strong>of</strong> forty. Considered the father <strong>of</strong> soil physics in the United States,<br />

King had also studied soil fertility.<br />

King’s stay in Washington was short. In his new post, King studied relations<br />

between bulk soil composition, the levels <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients in soil<br />

solutions, and crop yields. He found that the amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients in soil<br />

solutions differed from amounts suggested by total chemical analysis <strong>of</strong><br />

soil samples but correlated with crop yields—conclusions at odds with<br />

those published by his new boss. Refusing to endorse King’s results, Whitney<br />

forced him to resign from the bureau and return to academia where he<br />

would be less <strong>of</strong> a nuisance.<br />

While Hilgard and Whitney feuded in academic journals, a new concept<br />

evolved <strong>of</strong> soils as ecological systems influenced by geology, chemistry,<br />

meteorology, and biology. In particular, recognition <strong>of</strong> the biological basis<br />

for nitrogen fixation helped lay the foundation for the modern concept <strong>of</strong><br />

the soil as the frontier between geology and biology. Within a century <strong>of</strong><br />

their discovery, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were recognized to<br />

dirty business

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!