Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
192<br />
important was the mix <strong>of</strong> silt, sand, and clay. Based on bulk chemistry,<br />
Whitney had a point. But Hilgard knew that not everything in a soil was<br />
available to plants.<br />
In 1901 Whitney was appointed chief <strong>of</strong> the U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Agriculture’s<br />
Bureau <strong>of</strong> Soils. <strong>The</strong> new bureau launched a massive national soil<br />
and land survey, published detailed soil survey maps for use by farmers,<br />
and exuded confidence in the nation’s dirt, believing that all soils contained<br />
enough inorganic elements to grow any crop. “<strong>The</strong> soil is the one<br />
indestructible, immutable asset that the Nation possesses. It is the one<br />
resource that cannot be exhausted; that cannot be used up.” 4 Outraged, an<br />
aging Hilgard complained about the lack <strong>of</strong> geologic and chemical information<br />
in the new bureau’s surveys.<br />
Several years before, in 1903, Whitney had published a USDA bulletin<br />
arguing that all soils contained strikingly similar nutrient solutions saturated<br />
in relatively insoluble minerals. According to Whitney, soil fertility<br />
simply depended on cultural methods used to grow food rather than the<br />
native ability <strong>of</strong> the soil to support plant growth. Soil fertility was virtually<br />
limitless. An incensed Hilgard devoted his waning years to battling the<br />
politically connected Whitney’s growing influence.<br />
A year before he published the controversial bulletin, Whitney had hired<br />
Franklin King to head a new Division <strong>of</strong> Soil Management. A graduate <strong>of</strong><br />
Cornell University, King had been appointed in 1888 by the University <strong>of</strong><br />
Wisconsin to be the country’s first pr<strong>of</strong>essor <strong>of</strong> agricultural physics at the<br />
age <strong>of</strong> forty. Considered the father <strong>of</strong> soil physics in the United States,<br />
King had also studied soil fertility.<br />
King’s stay in Washington was short. In his new post, King studied relations<br />
between bulk soil composition, the levels <strong>of</strong> plant nutrients in soil<br />
solutions, and crop yields. He found that the amount <strong>of</strong> nutrients in soil<br />
solutions differed from amounts suggested by total chemical analysis <strong>of</strong><br />
soil samples but correlated with crop yields—conclusions at odds with<br />
those published by his new boss. Refusing to endorse King’s results, Whitney<br />
forced him to resign from the bureau and return to academia where he<br />
would be less <strong>of</strong> a nuisance.<br />
While Hilgard and Whitney feuded in academic journals, a new concept<br />
evolved <strong>of</strong> soils as ecological systems influenced by geology, chemistry,<br />
meteorology, and biology. In particular, recognition <strong>of</strong> the biological basis<br />
for nitrogen fixation helped lay the foundation for the modern concept <strong>of</strong><br />
the soil as the frontier between geology and biology. Within a century <strong>of</strong><br />
their discovery, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium were recognized to<br />
dirty business