Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
tion <strong>of</strong> heavy machinery and agrochemicals. Adopting twentieth-century<br />
agricultural methods greatly accelerated soil erosion.<br />
One <strong>of</strong> the most persistent agricultural myths is that larger mechanized<br />
farms are more efficient and pr<strong>of</strong>itable than smaller traditional farms. But<br />
larger farms spend more per unit <strong>of</strong> production because they buy expensive<br />
equipment, fertilizer, and pesticides. Unlike industrial enterprises in<br />
which economies <strong>of</strong> scale characterize manufacturing, smaller farms can be<br />
more efficient—even before accounting for health, environmental, and<br />
social costs. A 1989 National Research Council study flatly contradicted<br />
the bigger is more efficient myth <strong>of</strong> American agriculture. “Well-managed<br />
alternative farming systems nearly always use less synthetic chemical pesticides,<br />
fertilizers, and antibiotics per unit <strong>of</strong> production than conventional<br />
farms. Reduced use <strong>of</strong> these inputs lowers production costs and lessens<br />
agriculture’s potential for adverse environmental and health effects without<br />
decreasing—and in some cases increasing—per acre crop yields.” 12<br />
Small farms also can produce more food from the same amount <strong>of</strong> land.<br />
A 1992 U.S. agricultural census report found that small farms grow two to<br />
ten times as much per acre as do large farms. When compared to farms<br />
greater than six thousand acres in size, farms smaller than twenty-seven<br />
acres were more than ten times as productive; some tiny farms—less than<br />
four acres—were more than a hundred times as productive. <strong>The</strong> World<br />
Bank now encourages small farms to increase agricultural productivity in<br />
developing nations, where most landholders own less than ten acres.<br />
A key difference between small farms and large industrial farming operations<br />
is that large farms typically practice monoculture, even though they<br />
may grow different crops in different fields. Single-crop fields are ideal for<br />
heavy machinery and intensive chemical use. Although monocultures generally<br />
produce the greatest yields per acre for a single crop, diversified polycultures<br />
produce more food per acre based on the total output from several<br />
crops.<br />
Despite the overall efficiency <strong>of</strong> small farms, the trend is toward larger,<br />
more industrialized farms. In the 1930s seven million Americans farmed.<br />
Today fewer than two million farmers remain on their land. As recently as<br />
the early 1990s, the United States had lost more than twenty-five thousand<br />
family farms a year. On average, more than two hundred American farms<br />
have gone under every day for the past fifty years. In the second half <strong>of</strong> the<br />
twentieth century, the average farm size more than doubled, from under<br />
one hundred to almost two hundred hectares. Less than 20 percent <strong>of</strong> U.S.<br />
farms now produce almost 90 percent <strong>of</strong> the food grown in America.<br />
dust blow 159