Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
190<br />
Hilgard rightly dismissed the popular idea that the source <strong>of</strong> soil fertility<br />
lay in the organic compounds in the soil. Also rejecting the western<br />
European doctrine that soil fertility was based on soil’s texture and its ability<br />
to absorb water, he believed that clays retained nutrients necessary for<br />
plant growth and considered reliance on chemical fertilizers a dangerous<br />
addiction that promoted soil exhaustion.<br />
Hilgard recognized that certain plants revealed the nature <strong>of</strong> the underlying<br />
soil. Crab apple, wild plum, and cottonwoods grew well on calciumrich<br />
soil. Pines grew well on calcium-poor soil. Hired by the federal government<br />
to assess cotton production for the 1880 census, he produced two<br />
volumes that divided regional soils into distinct classes based on their<br />
physical and chemical differences. Hilgard stressed understanding the<br />
physical character <strong>of</strong> a soil, as well as its thickness and the depth to water,<br />
before judging its agricultural potential. He thought that phosphorus and<br />
potassium in minerals and nitrogen in soil organic matter controlled soil<br />
fertility. Hilgard’s census report noted that aggressive fertilizer use was<br />
starting to revive agriculture in the Carolinas.<br />
He also reported how Mississippi hill country farmers concentrated on<br />
plowing valley bottoms where upland dirt had piled up after cotton plantations<br />
stripped <strong>of</strong>f the black topsoil. Great gullies surrounded empty<br />
manors amidst abandoned upland fields. Hilgard thought that a permanent<br />
agriculture required small family farms rather than large commercial<br />
plantations or tenant farmers seeking to maximize each year’s pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />
With a view <strong>of</strong> the soil forged in the Deep South, Hilgard moved to<br />
Berkeley in his early forties to take a pr<strong>of</strong>essorship at the new University <strong>of</strong><br />
California. He arrived just as Californians began shaking <strong>of</strong>f gold rush<br />
fever to worry about how to farm the Central Valley’s alkali soils—salty<br />
ground unlike anything back East. Newspapers were full <strong>of</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong><br />
crops that withered mysteriously or produced marginal yields.<br />
<strong>The</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> alkali soils increased as irrigation spread across the golden<br />
state. Every new irrigated field raised the local groundwater table a little<br />
more. Each summer, evaporation pumped more salt up into the soil. Hilgard<br />
realized that, like a lamp’s wick, clay soils brought the salt closer to the<br />
surface. Better drained, sandy soils were less susceptible to salt buildup.<br />
Hilgard also realized that alkali soils could make excellent agricultural<br />
soils—if you could just get rid <strong>of</strong> the salt.<br />
Hilgard fought the then popular idea that salty soils resulted from seawater<br />
evaporated after Noah’s flood. <strong>The</strong> ancient flood idea simply didn’t<br />
hold water; the dirt was full <strong>of</strong> the wrong stuff. California’s soils were rich<br />
dirty business