27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

190<br />

Hilgard rightly dismissed the popular idea that the source <strong>of</strong> soil fertility<br />

lay in the organic compounds in the soil. Also rejecting the western<br />

European doctrine that soil fertility was based on soil’s texture and its ability<br />

to absorb water, he believed that clays retained nutrients necessary for<br />

plant growth and considered reliance on chemical fertilizers a dangerous<br />

addiction that promoted soil exhaustion.<br />

Hilgard recognized that certain plants revealed the nature <strong>of</strong> the underlying<br />

soil. Crab apple, wild plum, and cottonwoods grew well on calciumrich<br />

soil. Pines grew well on calcium-poor soil. Hired by the federal government<br />

to assess cotton production for the 1880 census, he produced two<br />

volumes that divided regional soils into distinct classes based on their<br />

physical and chemical differences. Hilgard stressed understanding the<br />

physical character <strong>of</strong> a soil, as well as its thickness and the depth to water,<br />

before judging its agricultural potential. He thought that phosphorus and<br />

potassium in minerals and nitrogen in soil organic matter controlled soil<br />

fertility. Hilgard’s census report noted that aggressive fertilizer use was<br />

starting to revive agriculture in the Carolinas.<br />

He also reported how Mississippi hill country farmers concentrated on<br />

plowing valley bottoms where upland dirt had piled up after cotton plantations<br />

stripped <strong>of</strong>f the black topsoil. Great gullies surrounded empty<br />

manors amidst abandoned upland fields. Hilgard thought that a permanent<br />

agriculture required small family farms rather than large commercial<br />

plantations or tenant farmers seeking to maximize each year’s pr<strong>of</strong>its.<br />

With a view <strong>of</strong> the soil forged in the Deep South, Hilgard moved to<br />

Berkeley in his early forties to take a pr<strong>of</strong>essorship at the new University <strong>of</strong><br />

California. He arrived just as Californians began shaking <strong>of</strong>f gold rush<br />

fever to worry about how to farm the Central Valley’s alkali soils—salty<br />

ground unlike anything back East. Newspapers were full <strong>of</strong> accounts <strong>of</strong><br />

crops that withered mysteriously or produced marginal yields.<br />

<strong>The</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> alkali soils increased as irrigation spread across the golden<br />

state. Every new irrigated field raised the local groundwater table a little<br />

more. Each summer, evaporation pumped more salt up into the soil. Hilgard<br />

realized that, like a lamp’s wick, clay soils brought the salt closer to the<br />

surface. Better drained, sandy soils were less susceptible to salt buildup.<br />

Hilgard also realized that alkali soils could make excellent agricultural<br />

soils—if you could just get rid <strong>of</strong> the salt.<br />

Hilgard fought the then popular idea that salty soils resulted from seawater<br />

evaporated after Noah’s flood. <strong>The</strong> ancient flood idea simply didn’t<br />

hold water; the dirt was full <strong>of</strong> the wrong stuff. California’s soils were rich<br />

dirty business

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!