Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
230<br />
pushes peasants from hillside subsistence farms to search for work in Portau-Prince,<br />
where the concentration <strong>of</strong> desperate people in slums contributes<br />
to the country’s tragic history <strong>of</strong> civil strife.<br />
In Haiti, the majority <strong>of</strong> peasants own their own small farms. So small<br />
farms per se are not the answer to stopping erosion. When farms become<br />
so small that it is hard to make a living from them, it becomes hard to practice<br />
soil conservation. In Cuba, fifty miles from Haiti across the Windward<br />
Passage, the collapse <strong>of</strong> the Soviet Union set up a unique agricultural<br />
experiment. Before the 1959 Cuban revolution, the handful <strong>of</strong> people who<br />
controlled four-fifths <strong>of</strong> the land operated large export-oriented plantations,<br />
mostly growing sugar. Although small subsistence farms were still<br />
common on the remaining fifth <strong>of</strong> the land, Cuba produced less than half<br />
its own food.<br />
After the revolution, in line with its vision <strong>of</strong> socialist progress, the new<br />
government continued sponsoring large-scale, industrial monoculture<br />
focused on export crops—primarily sugar, which accounted for threequarters<br />
<strong>of</strong> Cuba’s export income. Cuba’s sugar plantations were the most<br />
mechanized agricultural operations in Latin America, more closely resembling<br />
those in California’s Central Valley than on Haiti’s hillsides. Farm<br />
equipment, the oil to run them, fertilizers, pesticides, and more than half<br />
<strong>of</strong> Cuba’s food were imported from the island’s socialist trading partners.<br />
<strong>The</strong> end <strong>of</strong> Soviet support and an ongoing U.S. trade embargo plunged<br />
Cuba into a food crisis. Unable to import food or fertilizer, Cuba saw the<br />
calories and protein in the average diet drop by almost a third, from 3,000<br />
calories a day to 1,900 calories between 1989 and 1994.<br />
<strong>The</strong> Soviet collapse resulted in an almost 90 percent drop in Cuba’s<br />
external trade. Fertilizer and pesticide imports fell by 80 percent and oil<br />
imports fell by 50 percent. Parts to repair farm machinery were unobtainable.<br />
<strong>The</strong> New York Times editorial page predicted the imminent collapse<br />
<strong>of</strong> Castro’s regime. Formerly one <strong>of</strong> the best-fed nations in Latin America,<br />
Cuba was not quite at the level <strong>of</strong> Haiti—but not much above it. Isolated<br />
and facing the loss <strong>of</strong> a meal a day for everyone on the island, Cuban agriculture<br />
needed to double food production using half the inputs required<br />
by conventional agriculture.<br />
Faced with this dilemma, Cuba began a remarkable agricultural experiment,<br />
the first nation-scale test <strong>of</strong> alternative agriculture. In the mid-1980s,<br />
the Cuban government directed state-run research institutions to begin<br />
investigating alternative methods to reduce environmental impacts,<br />
improve soil fertility, and increase harvests. Within six months <strong>of</strong> the<br />
islands in time