27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

difference between good farming and the most pr<strong>of</strong>itable farming. Still, he<br />

points out that everybody need not be a farmer in an agrarian society, nor<br />

need industrial production be limited to the bare necessities. <strong>The</strong> distinction<br />

in Berry’s view is that agriculture and manufacturing in an agrarian<br />

society would be tailored to the local landscape. While it is difficult to reconcile<br />

current trends with this vision for an agrarian economy, a reoriented<br />

capitalism is not unimaginable. After all, today’s quasi-sovereign global<br />

corporations were inconceivable just a few centuries ago.<br />

Agriculture has experienced several revolutions in historical times: the<br />

yeoman’s revolution based on relearning Roman soil husbandry and the<br />

agrochemical and green revolutions based on fertilizer and agrotechnology.<br />

Today, the growing adoption <strong>of</strong> no-till and organic methods is fostering a<br />

modern agrarian revolution based on soil conservation. Whereas past agricultural<br />

revolutions focused on increasing crop yields, the ongoing one<br />

needs to sustain them to ensure the continuity <strong>of</strong> our modern global<br />

civilization.<br />

<strong>The</strong> philosophical basis <strong>of</strong> the new agriculture lies in treating soil as a<br />

locally adapted biological system rather than a chemical system. Yet agroecology<br />

is not simply a return to old labor-intensive ways <strong>of</strong> farming. It is<br />

just as scientific as the latest genetically modified technologies—but based<br />

on biology and ecology rather than chemistry and genetics. Rooted in the<br />

complex interactions between soil, water, plants, animals, and microbes,<br />

agroecology depends more on understanding local conditions and context<br />

than on using standardized products or techniques. It requires farming<br />

guided by locally adapted knowledge—farming with brains rather than by<br />

habit or convenience.<br />

Agroecology doesn’t mean simply going organic. Even forgoing pesticides,<br />

California’s newly industrialized organic factory farms are not necessarily<br />

conserving soil. When demand for organic produce began to skyrocket<br />

in the 1990s, industrial farms began planting monocultural stands<br />

<strong>of</strong> lettuce that retained the flaws <strong>of</strong> conventional agriculture—just without<br />

the pesticides.<br />

Agroecology doesn’t necessarily mean small farms instead <strong>of</strong> large farms.<br />

Haiti’s tiny peasant farms destroyed soil on steep slopes just as effectively<br />

as the immense slave-worked plantations <strong>of</strong> the American South. And the<br />

problem isn’t just mechanization. Roman oxen slowly stripped soil as effectively<br />

as the diesel-powered descendants <strong>of</strong> John Deere’s plows. <strong>The</strong> underlying<br />

problem is confoundingly simple: agricultural methods that lose soil<br />

life span <strong>of</strong> civilizations 241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!