27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

the introduction <strong>of</strong> clover and other nitrogen-fixing plants into crop rotations<br />

in the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. Crop yields at the<br />

start <strong>of</strong> the eighteenth century were not all that much greater than medieval<br />

levels, implying that increased agricultural production came largely from<br />

expanding the area cultivated rather than improved agricultural methods.<br />

Wheat yields had risen by just a bushel and a half over medieval yields <strong>of</strong><br />

ten to twelve bushels per acre. Yet by 1810 yields had almost doubled. By<br />

1860 they had reached twenty-five to twenty-eight bushels an acre.<br />

Increasing labor needed to harvest an acre <strong>of</strong> crops implies that crop<br />

yields rose over time. <strong>The</strong> number <strong>of</strong> person days required to harvest an<br />

acre <strong>of</strong> wheat increased from about two around 1600 to two and a half by<br />

the early 1700s, and then to just over three in 1860. Overall crop yields<br />

increased by two and a half times in the six hundred years from 1200 to<br />

1800. So despite increasing yields, the tenfold population increase primarily<br />

reflected expansion <strong>of</strong> the area under cultivation.<br />

During the same period about a quarter <strong>of</strong> England’s cultivated land was<br />

transformed from open, common fields to fenced estates. By the end <strong>of</strong> the<br />

eighteenth century, common fields had almost disappeared from the English<br />

landscape. Loss <strong>of</strong> the common lands meant the difference between<br />

independence and destitution for rural households that had always kept a<br />

cow on the commons. Dispossessed, landless peasants with no work depended<br />

on public relief for food. Seeing the economic effects <strong>of</strong> the transformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the English countryside, Board <strong>of</strong> Agriculture secretary<br />

Arthur Young came to see land enclosure as a dangerous trend destroying<br />

rural self-sufficiency. But enclosing and privatizing the last vestiges <strong>of</strong> communal<br />

property conveniently pushed a new class <strong>of</strong> landless peasants to<br />

seek jobs just as laborers were needed in Britain’s industrializing cities.<br />

By the early nineteenth century, British farms had developed into a<br />

mixed system <strong>of</strong> fields and pastures. A roughly equal emphasis on cultivation<br />

and animal husbandry provided for constant enrichment <strong>of</strong> the soil<br />

with large quantities <strong>of</strong> manure, and cover crops <strong>of</strong> clover and legumes.<br />

English population growth mirrored increases in agricultural production<br />

from after the Black Death to the Industrial Revolution. Between 1750<br />

and 1850, England’s cereal production and population both doubled. Did<br />

a growing human population drive up demand for agricultural products?<br />

Or did increased agricultural production enable faster population growth?<br />

Regardless <strong>of</strong> how we view the causality, the two rose in tandem.<br />

Nonetheless, as the population grew, the European diet declined. With<br />

almost all <strong>of</strong> the available land in cultivation, Europeans increasingly sur-<br />

let them eat colonies 99

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!