Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Ammonia plant construction began again in earnest in the run-up to the<br />
Second World War. <strong>The</strong> Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) dams provided<br />
ideal sites for additional ammonia plants built to manufacture explosives.<br />
One plant was operating when Japan bombed Pearl Harbor; ten were<br />
operating by the time Berlin fell.<br />
After the war, governments around the world sought and fostered markets<br />
for ammonia from suddenly obsolete munitions factories. Fertilizer use<br />
in the TVA region shot up rapidly thanks to abundant supplies <strong>of</strong> cheap<br />
nitrates. American fertilizer production exploded in the 1950s when new<br />
natural gas feedstock plants in Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma were connected<br />
to pipelines to carry liquid ammonia north to the corn belt. Europe’s<br />
bombed-out plants were rebuilt and converted to fertilizer production.<br />
Expansion <strong>of</strong> Russian ammonia production was based on central Asian and<br />
Siberian natural gas fields. Global production <strong>of</strong> ammonia more than doubled<br />
in the 1960s and doubled again in the 1970s. By 1998 the world’s chemical<br />
industry produced more than 150 million metric tons <strong>of</strong> ammonia a<br />
year; the Haber-Bosch process supplied more than 99 percent <strong>of</strong> production.<br />
Natural gas remains the principal feedstock for about 80 percent <strong>of</strong><br />
global ammonia production.<br />
<strong>The</strong> agricultural output <strong>of</strong> industrialized countries roughly doubled in<br />
the second half <strong>of</strong> the twentieth century. Much <strong>of</strong> this newfound productivity<br />
came from increasing reliance on manufactured fertilizers. Global<br />
use <strong>of</strong> nitrogen fertilizers tripled between the Second World War and 1960,<br />
tripled again by 1970, and then doubled once more by 1980. <strong>The</strong> ready<br />
availability <strong>of</strong> cheap nitrogen led farmers to abandon traditional crop rotations<br />
and periodic fallowing in favor <strong>of</strong> continuous cultivation <strong>of</strong> row<br />
crops. For the period from 1961 to 2000, there is an almost perfect correlation<br />
between global fertilizer use and global grain production.<br />
Soil productivity became divorced from the condition <strong>of</strong> the land as<br />
industrialized agrochemistry ramped up crop yields. <strong>The</strong> shift to largescale<br />
monoculture and increasing reliance on fertilizer segregated animal<br />
husbandry from growing crops. Armed with fertilizers, manure was no<br />
longer needed to maintain soil fertility.<br />
Much <strong>of</strong> the increased demand for nitrogen fertilizer reflects the adoption<br />
<strong>of</strong> new high-yield strains <strong>of</strong> wheat and rice developed to feed the<br />
world’s growing population. In his 1970 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance<br />
speech, Norman Borlaug, pioneering developer <strong>of</strong> the green revolution’s<br />
high-yield rice, credited synthetic fertilizer production for the dramatic<br />
dirty business 197