27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

244<br />

figuring the downstream end <strong>of</strong> modern sewage systems to close the loop<br />

on nutrient cycling by returning the waste from livestock and people back<br />

to the soil. As archaic as it may sound, someday our collective well-being<br />

is likely to depend on it.<br />

At the same time, we can’t afford to lose any more farmland. Fifty years<br />

from now every hectare <strong>of</strong> agricultural land will be crucial. Every farm that<br />

gets paved over today means that the world will support fewer people<br />

down the road. In India, where we would expect farmland to be sacred,<br />

farmers near cities are selling <strong>of</strong>f topsoil to make bricks for the booming<br />

housing market. Developing nations simply cannot afford to sell <strong>of</strong>f their<br />

future this way, just as the developed world cannot pave its way to sustainability.<br />

<strong>Agricultural</strong> land should be viewed—and treated—as a trust<br />

held by farmers today for farmers tomorrow.<br />

Still, farms should be owned by those who work them—by people who<br />

know their land and who have a stake in improving it. Tenant farming is<br />

not in society’s best interest. Private ownership is essential; absentee landlords<br />

give little thought to safeguarding the future.<br />

Viewed globally, humanity need not face a stark choice between eating<br />

and saving endangered species. Protecting biodiversity does not necessarily<br />

require sacrificing productive agricultural land because soils with high<br />

agricultural productivity tend to support low biodiversity. Conversely,<br />

areas with high biodiversity tend to be areas with low agricultural potential.<br />

In general, species-rich tropical latitudes tend to have nutrient-poor<br />

soils, and the world’s most fertile soils are found in the species-poor loess<br />

belts <strong>of</strong> the temperate latitudes.<br />

Much <strong>of</strong> the recent loss <strong>of</strong> biodiversity has been encouraged by government<br />

subsidies and tax incentives that allowed clearing and plowing <strong>of</strong><br />

lands (like tropical rainforests) that can be pr<strong>of</strong>itably farmed for only a<br />

short period and are <strong>of</strong>ten abandoned once the subsidies lapse (or the soil<br />

erodes). Unfortunately, most developing countries are in the tropical latitudes<br />

where soils are both poor in nutrients and vulnerable to erosion.<br />

Despite this awkward geopolitical asymmetry, it is myopic to ignore the<br />

reality that development built upon mining soil guarantees future food<br />

shortages.<br />

<strong>The</strong>re are three great regions that could sustain intensive mechanized<br />

agriculture—the wide expanses <strong>of</strong> the world’s loess belts in the American<br />

plains, Europe, and northern China, where thick blankets <strong>of</strong> easily farmed<br />

silt can sustain intensive farming even once the original soil disappears. In<br />

the thin soils over rock that characterize most <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the planet, the<br />

life span <strong>of</strong> civilizations

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!