Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
244<br />
figuring the downstream end <strong>of</strong> modern sewage systems to close the loop<br />
on nutrient cycling by returning the waste from livestock and people back<br />
to the soil. As archaic as it may sound, someday our collective well-being<br />
is likely to depend on it.<br />
At the same time, we can’t afford to lose any more farmland. Fifty years<br />
from now every hectare <strong>of</strong> agricultural land will be crucial. Every farm that<br />
gets paved over today means that the world will support fewer people<br />
down the road. In India, where we would expect farmland to be sacred,<br />
farmers near cities are selling <strong>of</strong>f topsoil to make bricks for the booming<br />
housing market. Developing nations simply cannot afford to sell <strong>of</strong>f their<br />
future this way, just as the developed world cannot pave its way to sustainability.<br />
<strong>Agricultural</strong> land should be viewed—and treated—as a trust<br />
held by farmers today for farmers tomorrow.<br />
Still, farms should be owned by those who work them—by people who<br />
know their land and who have a stake in improving it. Tenant farming is<br />
not in society’s best interest. Private ownership is essential; absentee landlords<br />
give little thought to safeguarding the future.<br />
Viewed globally, humanity need not face a stark choice between eating<br />
and saving endangered species. Protecting biodiversity does not necessarily<br />
require sacrificing productive agricultural land because soils with high<br />
agricultural productivity tend to support low biodiversity. Conversely,<br />
areas with high biodiversity tend to be areas with low agricultural potential.<br />
In general, species-rich tropical latitudes tend to have nutrient-poor<br />
soils, and the world’s most fertile soils are found in the species-poor loess<br />
belts <strong>of</strong> the temperate latitudes.<br />
Much <strong>of</strong> the recent loss <strong>of</strong> biodiversity has been encouraged by government<br />
subsidies and tax incentives that allowed clearing and plowing <strong>of</strong><br />
lands (like tropical rainforests) that can be pr<strong>of</strong>itably farmed for only a<br />
short period and are <strong>of</strong>ten abandoned once the subsidies lapse (or the soil<br />
erodes). Unfortunately, most developing countries are in the tropical latitudes<br />
where soils are both poor in nutrients and vulnerable to erosion.<br />
Despite this awkward geopolitical asymmetry, it is myopic to ignore the<br />
reality that development built upon mining soil guarantees future food<br />
shortages.<br />
<strong>The</strong>re are three great regions that could sustain intensive mechanized<br />
agriculture—the wide expanses <strong>of</strong> the world’s loess belts in the American<br />
plains, Europe, and northern China, where thick blankets <strong>of</strong> easily farmed<br />
silt can sustain intensive farming even once the original soil disappears. In<br />
the thin soils over rock that characterize most <strong>of</strong> the rest <strong>of</strong> the planet, the<br />
life span <strong>of</strong> civilizations