Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A phenomenally successful adaptation, wetland rice cultivation spread<br />
across Asia, catalyzing dramatic population growth in regions ill suited for<br />
previous farming practices. Yet even though the new system supported<br />
more people, most still lived on the brink <strong>of</strong> starvation. Greater food production<br />
didn’t mean that the poor had more to eat. It usually meant more<br />
people to feed.<br />
Geographer Walter Mallory found no shortage <strong>of</strong> ideas for addressing<br />
China’s famines in the early 1920s. Civil engineers proposed controlling<br />
rivers to alleviate crop-damaging floods. <strong>Agricultural</strong> engineers suggested<br />
irrigation and land reclamation to increase cultivated acreage. Economists<br />
proposed new banking methods to encourage investment <strong>of</strong> urban capital<br />
in rural areas. Others with more overtly political agendas wanted to move<br />
people from densely populated regions to the wide-open spaces <strong>of</strong> Mongolia.<br />
Focused on treating symptoms, few addressed the root cause <strong>of</strong> overaggressive<br />
cultivation <strong>of</strong> marginal land.<br />
In 1920s China it took almost an acre (0.4 hectares) <strong>of</strong> land to feed a person<br />
for a year. A third <strong>of</strong> all land holdings were less than half an acre—not<br />
enough to feed a single person, let alone support a family. More than half<br />
<strong>of</strong> individual land holdings covered less than an acre and a half, a reality<br />
that kept the Chinese at perpetual risk <strong>of</strong> starvation. A bad year—failure<br />
<strong>of</strong> a single crop—brought famine. China was at the limit <strong>of</strong> its capacity to<br />
feed itself.<br />
Obtaining food consumed 70 to 80 percent <strong>of</strong> an average family income.<br />
Even so, the typical diet consisted <strong>of</strong> two meals <strong>of</strong> rice, bread, and<br />
salt turnips. People survived from harvest to harvest.<br />
Still, Mallory was impressed that peasant farmers maintained soil fertility<br />
despite intensive cultivation for more than four thousand years. He<br />
contrasted the longevity <strong>of</strong> Chinese agriculture with the rapid exhaustion<br />
<strong>of</strong> American soils. <strong>The</strong> key appeared to be intensive organic fertilization by<br />
returning human wastes from cities and towns to the fields. Without access<br />
to chemical fertilizers Chinese peasants fertilized the land themselves. By<br />
Mallory’s time, soil nutrients had been recycled through more than forty<br />
generations <strong>of</strong> farmers and their fields.<br />
In the 1920s famine-relief administrator Y. S. Djang investigated whether<br />
people in provinces with abundant harvests ate more food than they<br />
needed. It was considered an issue <strong>of</strong> national concern that some provinces<br />
gorged while their neighbors starved.<br />
One remarkable practice Djang found was prevalent in the province <strong>of</strong><br />
Shao-hsing (Shaoxing), where crops were reliable and abundant. He re-<br />
dirty business 181