27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A phenomenally successful adaptation, wetland rice cultivation spread<br />

across Asia, catalyzing dramatic population growth in regions ill suited for<br />

previous farming practices. Yet even though the new system supported<br />

more people, most still lived on the brink <strong>of</strong> starvation. Greater food production<br />

didn’t mean that the poor had more to eat. It usually meant more<br />

people to feed.<br />

Geographer Walter Mallory found no shortage <strong>of</strong> ideas for addressing<br />

China’s famines in the early 1920s. Civil engineers proposed controlling<br />

rivers to alleviate crop-damaging floods. <strong>Agricultural</strong> engineers suggested<br />

irrigation and land reclamation to increase cultivated acreage. Economists<br />

proposed new banking methods to encourage investment <strong>of</strong> urban capital<br />

in rural areas. Others with more overtly political agendas wanted to move<br />

people from densely populated regions to the wide-open spaces <strong>of</strong> Mongolia.<br />

Focused on treating symptoms, few addressed the root cause <strong>of</strong> overaggressive<br />

cultivation <strong>of</strong> marginal land.<br />

In 1920s China it took almost an acre (0.4 hectares) <strong>of</strong> land to feed a person<br />

for a year. A third <strong>of</strong> all land holdings were less than half an acre—not<br />

enough to feed a single person, let alone support a family. More than half<br />

<strong>of</strong> individual land holdings covered less than an acre and a half, a reality<br />

that kept the Chinese at perpetual risk <strong>of</strong> starvation. A bad year—failure<br />

<strong>of</strong> a single crop—brought famine. China was at the limit <strong>of</strong> its capacity to<br />

feed itself.<br />

Obtaining food consumed 70 to 80 percent <strong>of</strong> an average family income.<br />

Even so, the typical diet consisted <strong>of</strong> two meals <strong>of</strong> rice, bread, and<br />

salt turnips. People survived from harvest to harvest.<br />

Still, Mallory was impressed that peasant farmers maintained soil fertility<br />

despite intensive cultivation for more than four thousand years. He<br />

contrasted the longevity <strong>of</strong> Chinese agriculture with the rapid exhaustion<br />

<strong>of</strong> American soils. <strong>The</strong> key appeared to be intensive organic fertilization by<br />

returning human wastes from cities and towns to the fields. Without access<br />

to chemical fertilizers Chinese peasants fertilized the land themselves. By<br />

Mallory’s time, soil nutrients had been recycled through more than forty<br />

generations <strong>of</strong> farmers and their fields.<br />

In the 1920s famine-relief administrator Y. S. Djang investigated whether<br />

people in provinces with abundant harvests ate more food than they<br />

needed. It was considered an issue <strong>of</strong> national concern that some provinces<br />

gorged while their neighbors starved.<br />

One remarkable practice Djang found was prevalent in the province <strong>of</strong><br />

Shao-hsing (Shaoxing), where crops were reliable and abundant. He re-<br />

dirty business 181

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!