27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Soviet collapse, Cuba began privatizing industrialized state farms; staterun<br />

farms were divided among former employees, creating a network <strong>of</strong><br />

small farms. Government-sponsored farmers’ markets brought peasant<br />

farmers higher pr<strong>of</strong>its by cutting out intermediaries. Major government<br />

programs encouraged organic agriculture and small-scale farming on<br />

vacant city lots. Lacking access to fertilizers and pesticides, the food grown<br />

in the new small private farms and thousands <strong>of</strong> tiny urban market gardens<br />

became organic not through choice but through necessity.<br />

Charged with substituting knowledge-intensive agriculture for the<br />

embargoed inputs needed for conventional agriculture, the country’s<br />

research infrastructure built on experiments in alternative agriculture that<br />

had languished under the Soviet system but were available for widespread,<br />

and immediate, implementation under the new reality.<br />

Cuba adopted more labor-intensive methods to replace heavy machinery<br />

and chemical inputs, but Cuba’s agricultural revolution was not simply<br />

a return to traditional farming. Organic farming is not that simple. You<br />

cannot just hand someone a hoe and order them to feed the proletariat.<br />

Cuba’s agricultural transformation was based as much on science as was the<br />

Soviet era’s high-input mechanized farming. <strong>The</strong> difference was that the<br />

conventional approach was based on applied chemistry, whereas the new<br />

approach was based on applied biology—on agroecology.<br />

In a move pretty much the opposite <strong>of</strong> the green revolution that transformed<br />

global agriculture based on increased use <strong>of</strong> irrigation, oil, chemical<br />

fertilizers and pesticides, the Cuban government adapted agriculture to<br />

local conditions and developed biological methods <strong>of</strong> fertilization and pest<br />

control. It created a network <strong>of</strong> more than two hundred local agricultural<br />

extension <strong>of</strong>fices around the country to advise farmers on low-input and<br />

no-till farming methods, as well as biological pest control.<br />

Cuba stopped exporting sugar and began to grow its own food again.<br />

Within a decade, the Cuban diet rebounded to its former level without food<br />

imports or the use <strong>of</strong> agrochemicals. <strong>The</strong> Cuban experience shows that<br />

agroecology can form a viable basis for agriculture without industrial methods<br />

or biotechnology. Unintentionally, the U.S. trade embargo turned<br />

Cuba into a nation-scale experiment in alternative agriculture.<br />

Some look to the Cuban example as a model for employing locally<br />

adapted ecological insight and knowledge instead <strong>of</strong> standardized mechanization<br />

and agrochemistry to feed the world. <strong>The</strong>y see the solution not<br />

simply as producing cheap food, but keeping small farms—and therefore<br />

farmers—on the land, and even in cities. Thousands <strong>of</strong> commercial urban<br />

islands in time 231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!