Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Soviet collapse, Cuba began privatizing industrialized state farms; staterun<br />
farms were divided among former employees, creating a network <strong>of</strong><br />
small farms. Government-sponsored farmers’ markets brought peasant<br />
farmers higher pr<strong>of</strong>its by cutting out intermediaries. Major government<br />
programs encouraged organic agriculture and small-scale farming on<br />
vacant city lots. Lacking access to fertilizers and pesticides, the food grown<br />
in the new small private farms and thousands <strong>of</strong> tiny urban market gardens<br />
became organic not through choice but through necessity.<br />
Charged with substituting knowledge-intensive agriculture for the<br />
embargoed inputs needed for conventional agriculture, the country’s<br />
research infrastructure built on experiments in alternative agriculture that<br />
had languished under the Soviet system but were available for widespread,<br />
and immediate, implementation under the new reality.<br />
Cuba adopted more labor-intensive methods to replace heavy machinery<br />
and chemical inputs, but Cuba’s agricultural revolution was not simply<br />
a return to traditional farming. Organic farming is not that simple. You<br />
cannot just hand someone a hoe and order them to feed the proletariat.<br />
Cuba’s agricultural transformation was based as much on science as was the<br />
Soviet era’s high-input mechanized farming. <strong>The</strong> difference was that the<br />
conventional approach was based on applied chemistry, whereas the new<br />
approach was based on applied biology—on agroecology.<br />
In a move pretty much the opposite <strong>of</strong> the green revolution that transformed<br />
global agriculture based on increased use <strong>of</strong> irrigation, oil, chemical<br />
fertilizers and pesticides, the Cuban government adapted agriculture to<br />
local conditions and developed biological methods <strong>of</strong> fertilization and pest<br />
control. It created a network <strong>of</strong> more than two hundred local agricultural<br />
extension <strong>of</strong>fices around the country to advise farmers on low-input and<br />
no-till farming methods, as well as biological pest control.<br />
Cuba stopped exporting sugar and began to grow its own food again.<br />
Within a decade, the Cuban diet rebounded to its former level without food<br />
imports or the use <strong>of</strong> agrochemicals. <strong>The</strong> Cuban experience shows that<br />
agroecology can form a viable basis for agriculture without industrial methods<br />
or biotechnology. Unintentionally, the U.S. trade embargo turned<br />
Cuba into a nation-scale experiment in alternative agriculture.<br />
Some look to the Cuban example as a model for employing locally<br />
adapted ecological insight and knowledge instead <strong>of</strong> standardized mechanization<br />
and agrochemistry to feed the world. <strong>The</strong>y see the solution not<br />
simply as producing cheap food, but keeping small farms—and therefore<br />
farmers—on the land, and even in cities. Thousands <strong>of</strong> commercial urban<br />
islands in time 231