Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
206<br />
may prove our best hope for maintaining food production in the face <strong>of</strong><br />
population growth and continuing loss <strong>of</strong> agricultural land. In principle,<br />
intensive organic methods could even replace fertilizer-intensive agriculture<br />
once cheap fossil fuels are history.<br />
Here is the crux <strong>of</strong> Wes Jackson’s argument that tilling the soil has been<br />
an ecological catastrophe. A genetics pr<strong>of</strong>essor before he resigned to become<br />
president <strong>of</strong> the Land Institute in Salina, Kansas, Jackson says he is not<br />
advocating a return to the bow and arrow. He just questions the view that<br />
plowing the soil is irrefutably wholesome, pointedly suggesting that the<br />
plow destroyed more options for future generations than did the sword and<br />
that—with rare exceptions—plow-based agriculture hasn’t proven sustainable.<br />
He estimates that in the next two decades severe soil erosion will<br />
destroy 20 percent <strong>of</strong> the natural agricultural potential <strong>of</strong> our planet to grow<br />
crops without fertilizer or irrigation.<br />
Yet Jackson is neither doomsayer nor Luddite. In person he sounds more<br />
like a farmer than an environmental extremist. Instead <strong>of</strong> despair, he calls<br />
for agricultural methods based on emulating natural systems rather than<br />
controlling, or replacing them. In promoting natural systems agriculture,<br />
Jackson is the latest prophet for Xenophon’s philosophy <strong>of</strong> adapting agriculture<br />
to the land rather than vice versa.<br />
Drawing on experience in the American farm belt, Jackson seeks to<br />
develop an agricultural system based on imitating native prairie ecosystems.<br />
Unlike annual crops raised on bare, plowed ground, the roots <strong>of</strong><br />
native perennials hold the soil together through drenching rainstorms.<br />
Native prairies contain both warm-season and cold-season grasses, as well<br />
as legumes and composites. Some <strong>of</strong> the plants do better in wet years, some<br />
thrive in dry years. <strong>The</strong> combination helps keep out weeds and invasive<br />
species because plants cover the ground all year—just like our eco-lawn.<br />
As ecologists know, diversity conveys resilience—and resilience, Jackson<br />
says, can help keep agriculture sustainable. Hence he advocates growing a<br />
combination <strong>of</strong> crops year-round to shield the ground from the rain’s erosive<br />
impact. Monocultures generally leave the ground bare in the spring,<br />
exposing vulnerable soil to erosion for months before crops get big enough<br />
to block incoming rain. Storms hitting before crops leaf out cause two to<br />
ten times the erosion <strong>of</strong> storms later in the year when the ground lies<br />
shielded beneath crops. Under monoculture, one good storm at the wrong<br />
time can send erosion racing decades ahead <strong>of</strong> soil production.<br />
<strong>The</strong> beneficial effects <strong>of</strong> Jackson’s system are evident at the Land Institute.<br />
Research there has shown that a perennial polyculture can manage<br />
dirty business