27.03.2013 Views

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

158<br />

conservation, crop diversification, stabilizing farm income, and creating<br />

flexible farm credit. As much as anything, this last element, which allowed<br />

farmers to carry more debt, changed American farming. Within a decade,<br />

farm debt more than doubled while farm income rose by just a third.<br />

Despite a continual rise in government subsidies, more than four out <strong>of</strong><br />

every ten American farms disappeared between 1933 and 1968. Corporate<br />

factory farms better able to finance increasingly expensive farm machinery<br />

and agrochemicals began to dominate American agriculture by the end <strong>of</strong><br />

the 1960s.<br />

Although different in detail from Rome and the South, the economics<br />

<strong>of</strong> large corporate farms similarly discounted concern about soil erosion.<br />

Corporations are, by nature, temporary land owners. ...A tenant on<br />

corporate land has no assurance whatsoever <strong>of</strong> staying on the farm<br />

more than a year. ...A high proportion <strong>of</strong> corporate land tends to<br />

cause instability in land tenure and to foster erosion, unless the majority<br />

<strong>of</strong> corporations can be induced to adopt definite soil conservation<br />

programs on their land. Heavy mortgage indebtedness exerts a specific<br />

financial pressure upon the soil by forcing the farmer to squeeze out <strong>of</strong><br />

his soil whatever he can to meet his financial obligations. 11<br />

<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> mechanized industrial agriculture promoted rapid soil loss<br />

as farmers spent their natural capital to service loans for machinery and<br />

fertilizers.<br />

Records at Woburn Experimental Farm, established about twenty-five<br />

miles north <strong>of</strong> London in 1876 by England’s Royal <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Society</strong>,<br />

inadvertently documented the effects <strong>of</strong> changing agricultural practices on<br />

soil erosion. <strong>The</strong> first half century <strong>of</strong> crop yield experiments recorded little<br />

erosion. After the Second World War, the introduction <strong>of</strong> herbicides<br />

and heavy farm machinery changed that.<br />

<strong>The</strong> first report <strong>of</strong> soil erosion problems came after a storm on May 21,<br />

1950, when intense rainfall carved four-inch-deep, three-foot-wide gullies<br />

into bare fields, burying sugar beet plots beneath piles <strong>of</strong> dirt and<br />

unearthed potatoes. Serious erosion in the 1960s sharply reduced the<br />

organic nitrogen content on experimental plots. By the 1980s the farm<br />

served to validate soil erosion models, as more than a dozen erosional<br />

events occurred each year, especially on the farm’s steepest slopes. Yet the<br />

detailed diaries kept by farm staff from 1882 to 1947 had focused on the<br />

subtleties <strong>of</strong> crop performance, cultivation techniques, soil pH, and crop<br />

damage from varmints, with no mention <strong>of</strong> erosion before the introduc-<br />

dust blow

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!