Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Dirt: The Erosion of Civilizations - Kootenay Local Agricultural Society
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
158<br />
conservation, crop diversification, stabilizing farm income, and creating<br />
flexible farm credit. As much as anything, this last element, which allowed<br />
farmers to carry more debt, changed American farming. Within a decade,<br />
farm debt more than doubled while farm income rose by just a third.<br />
Despite a continual rise in government subsidies, more than four out <strong>of</strong><br />
every ten American farms disappeared between 1933 and 1968. Corporate<br />
factory farms better able to finance increasingly expensive farm machinery<br />
and agrochemicals began to dominate American agriculture by the end <strong>of</strong><br />
the 1960s.<br />
Although different in detail from Rome and the South, the economics<br />
<strong>of</strong> large corporate farms similarly discounted concern about soil erosion.<br />
Corporations are, by nature, temporary land owners. ...A tenant on<br />
corporate land has no assurance whatsoever <strong>of</strong> staying on the farm<br />
more than a year. ...A high proportion <strong>of</strong> corporate land tends to<br />
cause instability in land tenure and to foster erosion, unless the majority<br />
<strong>of</strong> corporations can be induced to adopt definite soil conservation<br />
programs on their land. Heavy mortgage indebtedness exerts a specific<br />
financial pressure upon the soil by forcing the farmer to squeeze out <strong>of</strong><br />
his soil whatever he can to meet his financial obligations. 11<br />
<strong>The</strong> growth <strong>of</strong> mechanized industrial agriculture promoted rapid soil loss<br />
as farmers spent their natural capital to service loans for machinery and<br />
fertilizers.<br />
Records at Woburn Experimental Farm, established about twenty-five<br />
miles north <strong>of</strong> London in 1876 by England’s Royal <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Society</strong>,<br />
inadvertently documented the effects <strong>of</strong> changing agricultural practices on<br />
soil erosion. <strong>The</strong> first half century <strong>of</strong> crop yield experiments recorded little<br />
erosion. After the Second World War, the introduction <strong>of</strong> herbicides<br />
and heavy farm machinery changed that.<br />
<strong>The</strong> first report <strong>of</strong> soil erosion problems came after a storm on May 21,<br />
1950, when intense rainfall carved four-inch-deep, three-foot-wide gullies<br />
into bare fields, burying sugar beet plots beneath piles <strong>of</strong> dirt and<br />
unearthed potatoes. Serious erosion in the 1960s sharply reduced the<br />
organic nitrogen content on experimental plots. By the 1980s the farm<br />
served to validate soil erosion models, as more than a dozen erosional<br />
events occurred each year, especially on the farm’s steepest slopes. Yet the<br />
detailed diaries kept by farm staff from 1882 to 1947 had focused on the<br />
subtleties <strong>of</strong> crop performance, cultivation techniques, soil pH, and crop<br />
damage from varmints, with no mention <strong>of</strong> erosion before the introduc-<br />
dust blow