28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A Playwright’s Progress 103<br />

focused his dramatic energies on teaching his audiences to respect reality<br />

ra<strong>the</strong>r than forcing <strong>the</strong>m to view aspects of reality that few could respect.<br />

Both techniques are reflections of his philosophy, but <strong>the</strong> latter reaches<br />

more nearly to <strong>the</strong> core of it. Idealism is pernicious because it is a wall<br />

erected between a sensitive conscience and reality. It protects <strong>the</strong> sensitivity<br />

of <strong>the</strong> idealist from unbearable horrors, but it also protects <strong>the</strong> evil<br />

from which <strong>the</strong> idealist is hiding. Only by facing evils can we combat <strong>the</strong>m,<br />

and social evils cannot be conquered by individuals but only by society.<br />

Thus as members of society we must learn to face reality, to do without <strong>the</strong><br />

blinders of idealism, and to respect <strong>the</strong> truth as well as ourselves.<br />

Respecting Reality: More Uncertain Beginnings<br />

His first attempt in that direction—Arms and <strong>the</strong> Man—was, like his first<br />

“realistic” play, enormously successful in drawing attention to <strong>the</strong> author<br />

and a failure from <strong>the</strong> author’s point of view. Shaw was disappointed with<br />

<strong>the</strong> first production of his premier “pleasant” play in part because of misunderstanding<br />

on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> performers, but <strong>the</strong> difficulty is inherent<br />

in <strong>the</strong> play itself. The point of Shaw’s endeavor was to inculcate a respect<br />

for reality, not to deride idealists. He was not trying to present Sergius and<br />

Raina as a pair of hollow pretenders but as people who are sincerely trying<br />

to live up to artificial standards. The difference between <strong>the</strong>m is that Sergius<br />

is a thorough idealist whose self-respect depends on <strong>the</strong> attainment of<br />

impossible and unnecessary standards, while Raina has sufficient self-confidence<br />

to accept reality when it is plainly laid out for her. For Shaw, this<br />

meant that Sergius is at least as tragic as he is ludicrous (Collected Letters<br />

1:429). Today, when <strong>the</strong> heroic ideals he took so seriously are dead and<br />

forgotten, it is extremely difficult to find an actor who can play Sergius as<br />

anything but a pompous fool. Even at <strong>the</strong> time he wrote <strong>the</strong> part, Shaw<br />

himself considered it to be “unsafe in second rate hands” (Collected Letters<br />

1:442). Shaw was not trying to set up embodiments of popular ideals and<br />

<strong>the</strong>n punch <strong>the</strong>m full of holes, although that is typically <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>the</strong><br />

play, even today. Mockery is <strong>the</strong> attitude of <strong>the</strong> disillusioned idealist, not of<br />

<strong>the</strong> realist.<br />

Shavian Realism in Candida<br />

The fully realized Shavian dramatic method emerges only with Candida.<br />

This is <strong>the</strong> first play that decisively breaks with <strong>the</strong> technique of tricking<br />

<strong>the</strong> spectators’ judgments, <strong>the</strong> juggling of <strong>the</strong> categories of good and evil

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!