Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A Playwright’s Progress 103<br />
focused his dramatic energies on teaching his audiences to respect reality<br />
ra<strong>the</strong>r than forcing <strong>the</strong>m to view aspects of reality that few could respect.<br />
Both techniques are reflections of his philosophy, but <strong>the</strong> latter reaches<br />
more nearly to <strong>the</strong> core of it. Idealism is pernicious because it is a wall<br />
erected between a sensitive conscience and reality. It protects <strong>the</strong> sensitivity<br />
of <strong>the</strong> idealist from unbearable horrors, but it also protects <strong>the</strong> evil<br />
from which <strong>the</strong> idealist is hiding. Only by facing evils can we combat <strong>the</strong>m,<br />
and social evils cannot be conquered by individuals but only by society.<br />
Thus as members of society we must learn to face reality, to do without <strong>the</strong><br />
blinders of idealism, and to respect <strong>the</strong> truth as well as ourselves.<br />
Respecting Reality: More Uncertain Beginnings<br />
His first attempt in that direction—Arms and <strong>the</strong> Man—was, like his first<br />
“realistic” play, enormously successful in drawing attention to <strong>the</strong> author<br />
and a failure from <strong>the</strong> author’s point of view. Shaw was disappointed with<br />
<strong>the</strong> first production of his premier “pleasant” play in part because of misunderstanding<br />
on <strong>the</strong> part of <strong>the</strong> performers, but <strong>the</strong> difficulty is inherent<br />
in <strong>the</strong> play itself. The point of Shaw’s endeavor was to inculcate a respect<br />
for reality, not to deride idealists. He was not trying to present Sergius and<br />
Raina as a pair of hollow pretenders but as people who are sincerely trying<br />
to live up to artificial standards. The difference between <strong>the</strong>m is that Sergius<br />
is a thorough idealist whose self-respect depends on <strong>the</strong> attainment of<br />
impossible and unnecessary standards, while Raina has sufficient self-confidence<br />
to accept reality when it is plainly laid out for her. For Shaw, this<br />
meant that Sergius is at least as tragic as he is ludicrous (Collected Letters<br />
1:429). Today, when <strong>the</strong> heroic ideals he took so seriously are dead and<br />
forgotten, it is extremely difficult to find an actor who can play Sergius as<br />
anything but a pompous fool. Even at <strong>the</strong> time he wrote <strong>the</strong> part, Shaw<br />
himself considered it to be “unsafe in second rate hands” (Collected Letters<br />
1:442). Shaw was not trying to set up embodiments of popular ideals and<br />
<strong>the</strong>n punch <strong>the</strong>m full of holes, although that is typically <strong>the</strong> effect of <strong>the</strong><br />
play, even today. Mockery is <strong>the</strong> attitude of <strong>the</strong> disillusioned idealist, not of<br />
<strong>the</strong> realist.<br />
Shavian Realism in Candida<br />
The fully realized Shavian dramatic method emerges only with Candida.<br />
This is <strong>the</strong> first play that decisively breaks with <strong>the</strong> technique of tricking<br />
<strong>the</strong> spectators’ judgments, <strong>the</strong> juggling of <strong>the</strong> categories of good and evil