28.03.2013 Views

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

Bernard Shaw's Remarkable Religion: A Faith That Fits the Facts

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Foreword<br />

“I believe because it is absurd,” said Søren Kierkegaard, speaking for all<br />

those who think a religious belief unworthy unless it can’t be proved and is<br />

even contrary to Nature. After all, <strong>the</strong>y reason, <strong>the</strong> gap between God and<br />

man is so great that it must require a “leap of faith” to bridge it. But in an<br />

age of science such as ours, in which <strong>the</strong> gap has perhaps lessened, <strong>the</strong>re are<br />

many who think that such leaps of faith may be from <strong>the</strong> factual to <strong>the</strong><br />

factitious and <strong>the</strong>refore too often dangerous and destructive, both to <strong>the</strong><br />

individual and to society. To those looking for a faith that better “fit <strong>the</strong><br />

facts,” <strong>Bernard</strong> Shaw for half a century offered a fascinating, seemingly<br />

new religion that attempted to answer <strong>the</strong> need for up-to-date factuality in<br />

its being based on evolution. Shaw’s remarkable departure in <strong>the</strong>ology, in<br />

fact, tempted some to try to explain his artistically and prophetically expressed<br />

religion in more conventional and literal terms and even to convert<br />

it into something more systematic and analytical, something more<br />

akin to formal philosophy and <strong>the</strong>ology. The latest, and I believe most<br />

successful, attempt to explain and update Shaw is Stuart Baker’s <strong>Bernard</strong><br />

Shaw’s <strong>Remarkable</strong> <strong>Religion</strong>: A <strong>Faith</strong> <strong>That</strong> <strong>Fits</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Facts</strong>, which is all <strong>the</strong><br />

more valuable because it shows <strong>the</strong> increasing relevance of Shaw’s religious<br />

insights to this age of, on <strong>the</strong> one hand, fundamentalist backlash and<br />

rising religious intolerance and, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, a nihilistic rejection of all<br />

religion.<br />

Baker presents Shaw as an original religious thinker, perilously asserting<br />

<strong>the</strong> unity of knowledge in <strong>the</strong> face of <strong>the</strong> dialectical tensions of <strong>the</strong> day<br />

between <strong>the</strong> extremes of skepticism and blind faith, naturalism and supernaturalism,<br />

materialism and spiritualism, summarized as <strong>the</strong> conflict between<br />

science and religion. The peril was in this “jesting apostle’s” often<br />

inviting misunderstanding and sometimes outright hostility in <strong>the</strong> ra<strong>the</strong>r<br />

reckless and playful way he expressed himself. Shavian speech was typically<br />

a high-wire act, balancing between trying to make do with language

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!